Good news. That doesn't include me.
The posts I see from you belie the claims you make.
Unfortunately, though, you've showing yourself to be on the far right.
I'm certainly to the right of you economically.
Actually, alot of people would seriously deny it.
No one with integrity.
Straw man. I never suggested any such thing.
It was just a question.
I would consider a great deal of current and proposed gun laws to be "heavy" control measures. People should be allowed to possess weapons, because when it comes down to it laws will not stop criminals from getting their hands on guns to use in committing crimes.
Okay, that's fairly sensible.
I argued that instead of background checks for gun purchases, that if we really need some kind of regulation it should maybe shift toward ammunition purchases instead, since ammunition is the part of the weapon that is expended, and since I don't think it's likely that criminal thugs are likely to have the capability of producing ammunition themselves. It's not a perfect answer by any means, but I think it's more likely to inhibit criminals than regulations on gun sales.
That's pretty heavy handed control, you must admit. California attempted this sort of stealth gun ban and it was found unconstitutional.
I'm not against all regulations regarding guns.
If you outlaw ammunition, regulating guns would be kind of senseless.
You don't even have anything productive to say, or anything intelligent. I'm not going to debate the constitutionality of the health care bill here, because that discussion has already happened in its own thread.
Yes, and I mopped the floor with you.
Yet you insist that it is inappropriate to allow marriage to evolve.
What I've stated is the reason that marriage offers advantage to society. Remove that, and the institution has no value to a stable society.
You insist that any such evolution is a conspiracy theorist style attack on the nuclear family.
And you accuse me of straw man arguments.
Counterculture - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You are against society from evolving into a form that has less bigoted hatred.
I am against the devolvling of society back into the traditional autocratic rule which has plagued most of human history. I oppose the concentration of power in the hands of tiny minority which rules the masses for their own interests.
For those with the wits to do so, a fastidious study of history from the enlightenment present, reveals that certain traits and structures make possible the liberty which we currently shed ourselves of. Among those are the principles of self-reliance and independence, coupled with the family clan structure for support within a safe and loyal body.
You want to maintain the same status quo of discrimination,
You speak falsely - I promote no discrimination. I clearly stated at the outset that I could care less who people have sex with, it's none of my business.
persecution, and maintenance of one religious position's influence over society with a disregard of acceptance of other peaceful religious positions.
That is an outright lie.
Then maybe you need to talk more about responsible parenthood and sexuality.
I speak plenty on it. The counter-culture along with the welfare dependency of the left have created a nation where the norm is for children to not have a father in a committed relationship with the mother.
This is simply the latest assault, from the usual suspects.
So now you're arguing conspiracy theories.
Don't be an idiot - it does little to shore up your faulty arguments.
It's clear that you're not arguing anything based on facts or reason.
Out-of-wedlock births hit record high - CNN
{In 1970, family households accounted for 81% of all households. By 2000, this
percentage had decreased to 69%. The percentage of married couple households with
own children decreased from 40% in 1970 to 24% in 2000. Other family households
increased from10.6% to 16.0% of households from 1970 to 2000. The largest part of the
change in family households is attributed to the growth in non-family households, the
growth in one-person households and the growth in the percentage of women living
alone.1}
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/coleman.pdf
Do some research, turn off Maddow, just ******* THINK! (It won't kill you.)