GOP Could Impeach Biden If He Wins....Here We Go Down Stupid Lane

[BlindBoo]

by looking at Bien's videotaped

Any moron can tell the difference between corruptly involving a country in our elections using bipartisan approved foreign aid to aid you personally and/or politically, and carrying out our bipartisan foreign policy using bipartisan approved foreign aid.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Not under oath he hasn't. Hunter is being offered a priceless gift, an opportunity to prove his innocence

What does that say about him if he refuses? Why is he afraid?

There was no crime to prove. And since you want witnesses why not Bolton, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pence, Pompeo, Trump, Parnas, Furman, Cipolini, Graham and Nunez?

None of those people were subpoenaed by Nadler or Schiff. Why not?

That was the time to build a case, it isn't the Senate's job to investigate.

BTW, since when are defense attorneys like Mr. Giuliani forced to testify ever?

Don't try that bullshit here ************. You know good and damned well why they could not testify before the motherfucking congress. You know good and ******* well how they all refused the subpoenas and how Bolton took his to court. So **** that. If trumps ***** ass had been so motherfucking innocent he would not be blocking the witnesses that can prove it.

Bolton's subpoena was WITHDRAWN by Shifty Schiff.

It isn't up to a defendant to prove their innocence,its up to the prosecutors to show he's guilty.\

**** that excuse. When subpoenas are issued the people under subpoena must comply. Trump refused to allow that to happen. Your bullshit excused of an "argument" fails on basic legal procedure. In a regular trial, everyone not honoring subpoenas would be arrested and trump would have been arrested for obstruction of justice because he did not allow witnesses under court order of subpoena to testify. So don't try that punk right wing crap argument here.

Anybody else doesn't have that ability. The President does via Executive Privilege. If there is a challenge to his privilege, then that gets settled in court--not an impeachment.

 

[justoffal]

Not under oath he hasn't. Hunter is being offered a priceless gift, an opportunity to prove his innocence

What does that say about him if he refuses? Why is he afraid?

There was no crime to prove. And since you want witnesses why not Bolton, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pence, Pompeo, Trump, Parnas, Furman, Cipolini, Graham and Nunez?

None of those people were subpoenaed by Nadler or Schiff. Why not?

That was the time to build a case, it isn't the Senate's job to investigate.

BTW, since when are defense attorneys like Mr. Giuliani forced to testify ever?

Don't try that bullshit here ************. You know good and damned well why they could not testify before the motherfucking congress. You know good and ******* well how they all refused the subpoenas and how Bolton took his to court. So **** that. If trumps ***** ass had been so motherfucking innocent he would not be blocking the witnesses that can prove it.

Bolton's subpoena was WITHDRAWN by Shifty Schiff.

It isn't up to a defendant to prove their innocence,its up to the prosecutors to show he's guilty.\

**** that excuse. When subpoenas are issued the people under subpoena must comply. Trump refused to allow that to happen. Your bullshit excuse of an "argument" fails on basic legal procedure. In a regular trial, everyone not honoring subpoenas would be arrested and trump would have been arrested for obstruction of justice because he did not allow witnesses under court order of subpoena to testify. So don't try that punk right wing crap argument here.

Yeah better get 4 years worth of tissues whilst the black community keeps rising despite your efforts to keep them down.

Jo

 

[justoffal]

There was no crime to prove. And since you want witnesses why not Bolton, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pence, Pompeo, Trump, Parnas, Furman, Cipolini, Graham and Nunez?

None of those people were subpoenaed by Nadler or Schiff. Why not?

That was the time to build a case, it isn't the Senate's job to investigate.

BTW, since when are defense attorneys like Mr. Giuliani forced to testify ever?

Don't try that bullshit here ************. You know good and damned well why they could not testify before the motherfucking congress. You know good and ******* well how they all refused the subpoenas and how Bolton took his to court. So **** that. If trumps ***** ass had been so motherfucking innocent he would not be blocking the witnesses that can prove it.

Bolton's subpoena was WITHDRAWN by Shifty Schiff.

It isn't up to a defendant to prove their innocence,its up to the prosecutors to show he's guilty.\

**** that excuse. When subpoenas are issued the people under subpoena must comply. Trump refused to allow that to happen. Your bullshit excused of an "argument" fails on basic legal procedure. In a regular trial, everyone not honoring subpoenas would be arrested and trump would have been arrested for obstruction of justice because he did not allow witnesses under court order of subpoena to testify. So don't try that punk right wing crap argument here.

Anybody else doesn't have that ability. The President does via Executive Privilege. If there is a challenge to his privilege, then that gets settled in court--not an impeachment.

You can tell this asshole isn't who he pretends to be just by the subject matter he dwells on. The minority community is coming up in record numbers and this Jerkoff wants it to stop.

Jo

 

[hadit]

House said they had all that was necessary when they impeached him on a partisan vote.

Why are you upset the Senate said they didn't, on a partisan vote?

Is being partisan only allowed for Democrats?

Because a lot more has come out since the Senate cover up. Remember Tramp has been obstructing Congress all along. But I agree the House should have investigated longer before voting on impeachment.

But I agree the House should have investigated longer before voting on impeachment.

Shame that Nadler, Schiff, and Pelosi wanted such an historic Christmas present.

Looks like their Christmas Cracker blew up in their faces.

Trump goes down as an Impeached President

Let him run on the sham that passed as a “trial”

First, he'll run on "vindicated", which despite the squeals from the usual suspects will resonate with many uneducated voters. Then if he wins reelection, it will become possibly the most moot point in political history, discussed bitterly by a small handful of the never appeased in a corner where they reassure each other that "he WAS impeached, you know".

He won't be running on vindicated. Not when 70 percent of the country wanted witness testimony.

Oh, but he will. You don't know Trump if you think he won't, and it will resonate with the lightly involved who wonder what all the hatred is about when the House already had the opportunity to hear from and, <gasp> actually DID hear from witnesses.

 

[Polishprince]

Because a lot more has come out since the Senate cover up. Remember Tramp has been obstructing Congress all along. But I agree the House should have investigated longer before voting on impeachment.

But I agree the House should have investigated longer before voting on impeachment.

Shame that Nadler, Schiff, and Pelosi wanted such an historic Christmas present.

Looks like their Christmas Cracker blew up in their faces.

Trump goes down as an Impeached President

Let him run on the sham that passed as a “trial”

First, he'll run on "vindicated", which despite the squeals from the usual suspects will resonate with many uneducated voters. Then if he wins reelection, it will become possibly the most moot point in political history, discussed bitterly by a small handful of the never appeased in a corner where they reassure each other that "he WAS impeached, you know".

He won't be running on vindicated. Not when 70 percent of the country wanted witness testimony.

Oh, but he will. You don't know Trump if you think he won't, and it will resonate with the lightly involved who wonder what all the hatred is about when the House already had the opportunity to hear from and, <gasp> actually DID hear from witnesses.

But the witnesses the House heard from only testified to hearsay, double, triple and quadruple hearsay.

Or merely offered their opinions on foreign policy, and indicated how upset they were that President Trump kept them out of the loop because of their alleged leaking

 

[RealDave]

Joe Biden Could Be Impeached by GOP Over Ukraine if He Wins, Iowa Senator Says

Well, we've had retarded (Adam Schitt).

And now we are talking counter retarded (Iowa Senator).

I would hope this really would not be the case.

America is fucked as it is.

Do we want to finish her off that much faster ?

Trump's defence team says you can't.

 

[RealDave]

Everyone is aware of Biden & the Ukraine so if they elect him, the voters say it was OK.

 

[RealDave]

Shame that Nadler, Schiff, and Pelosi wanted such an historic Christmas present.

Looks like their Christmas Cracker blew up in their faces.

Trump goes down as an Impeached President

Let him run on the sham that passed as a “trial”

First, he'll run on "vindicated", which despite the squeals from the usual suspects will resonate with many uneducated voters. Then if he wins reelection, it will become possibly the most moot point in political history, discussed bitterly by a small handful of the never appeased in a corner where they reassure each other that "he WAS impeached, you know".

He won't be running on vindicated. Not when 70 percent of the country wanted witness testimony.

Oh, but he will. You don't know Trump if you think he won't, and it will resonate with the lightly involved who wonder what all the hatred is about when the House already had the opportunity to hear from and, <gasp> actually DID hear from witnesses.

But the witnesses the House heard from only testified to hearsay, double, triple and quadruple hearsay.

Or merely offered their opinions on foreign policy, and indicated how upset they were that President Trump kept them out of the loop because of their alleged leaking

If I hear you talking to someone, it is not hearsay.

You assfucks are just plain dumber than shit.

 

[Polishprince]

Everyone is aware of Biden & the Ukraine so if they elect him, the voters say it was OK.

that doesn't mean the law should be ignored.

It would be time for an Investigation, see if there is an impeachable offense.

 

[hadit]

Everyone is aware of Biden & the Ukraine so if they elect him, the voters say it was OK.

Everyone is aware that Trump is bombastic, uncouth, vindictive and lies a lot, so since they elected him, the voters say it's OK.

 

[IM2]

Because a lot more has come out since the Senate cover up. Remember Tramp has been obstructing Congress all along. But I agree the House should have investigated longer before voting on impeachment.

But I agree the House should have investigated longer before voting on impeachment.

Shame that Nadler, Schiff, and Pelosi wanted such an historic Christmas present.

Looks like their Christmas Cracker blew up in their faces.

Trump goes down as an Impeached President

Let him run on the sham that passed as a “trial”

First, he'll run on "vindicated", which despite the squeals from the usual suspects will resonate with many uneducated voters. Then if he wins reelection, it will become possibly the most moot point in political history, discussed bitterly by a small handful of the never appeased in a corner where they reassure each other that "he WAS impeached, you know".

He won't be running on vindicated. Not when 70 percent of the country wanted witness testimony.

Oh, but he will. You don't know Trump if you think he won't, and it will resonate with the lightly involved who wonder what all the hatred is about when the House already had the opportunity to hear from and, <gasp> actually DID hear from witnesses.

He'll TRY to run on vindicated. It will not resonate. You think everybody sees this from your right wing POV, but the majority of Americans wanted to hear testimony and they will wonder why that didn't happen.

 

[IM2]

Everyone is aware of Biden & the Ukraine so if they elect him, the voters say it was OK.

Everyone is aware that Trump is bombastic, uncouth, vindictive and lies a lot, so since they elected him, the voters say it's OK.

The voting people elected Clinton. The appointed electors gave the office to trump.

 

[IM2]

Shame that Nadler, Schiff, and Pelosi wanted such an historic Christmas present.

Looks like their Christmas Cracker blew up in their faces.

Trump goes down as an Impeached President

Let him run on the sham that passed as a “trial”

First, he'll run on "vindicated", which despite the squeals from the usual suspects will resonate with many uneducated voters. Then if he wins reelection, it will become possibly the most moot point in political history, discussed bitterly by a small handful of the never appeased in a corner where they reassure each other that "he WAS impeached, you know".

He won't be running on vindicated. Not when 70 percent of the country wanted witness testimony.

Oh, but he will. You don't know Trump if you think he won't, and it will resonate with the lightly involved who wonder what all the hatred is about when the House already had the opportunity to hear from and, <gasp> actually DID hear from witnesses.

But the witnesses the House heard from only testified to hearsay, double, triple and quadruple hearsay.

Or merely offered their opinions on foreign policy, and indicated how upset they were that President Trump kept them out of the loop because of their alleged leaking

No they didn't and on top of that trump blocked the witnesses with more direct evidence. So again. drop that bullshit lie of an argument. If trump had been innocent, he doesn't black witnesses.

 

[IM2]

Everyone is aware of Biden & the Ukraine so if they elect him, the voters say it was OK.

that doesn't mean the law should be ignored.

It would be time for an Investigation, see if there is an impeachable offense.

There is no broken law to ignore as it pertains to Joe Biden.

 

[Polishprince]

Trump goes down as an Impeached President

Let him run on the sham that passed as a “trial”

First, he'll run on "vindicated", which despite the squeals from the usual suspects will resonate with many uneducated voters. Then if he wins reelection, it will become possibly the most moot point in political history, discussed bitterly by a small handful of the never appeased in a corner where they reassure each other that "he WAS impeached, you know".

He won't be running on vindicated. Not when 70 percent of the country wanted witness testimony.

Oh, but he will. You don't know Trump if you think he won't, and it will resonate with the lightly involved who wonder what all the hatred is about when the House already had the opportunity to hear from and, <gasp> actually DID hear from witnesses.

But the witnesses the House heard from only testified to hearsay, double, triple and quadruple hearsay.

Or merely offered their opinions on foreign policy, and indicated how upset they were that President Trump kept them out of the loop because of their alleged leaking

No they didn't and on top of that trump blocked the witnesses with more direct evidence. So again. drop that bullshit lie of an argument. If trump had been innocent, he doesn't black witnesses.

Mueller had already exonerated Trump in his witch hunt,.

And as the President explained, he wasn't going to cooperate in any re-do's.

 

[IM2]

There was no crime to prove. And since you want witnesses why not Bolton, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pence, Pompeo, Trump, Parnas, Furman, Cipolini, Graham and Nunez?

None of those people were subpoenaed by Nadler or Schiff. Why not?

That was the time to build a case, it isn't the Senate's job to investigate.

BTW, since when are defense attorneys like Mr. Giuliani forced to testify ever?

Don't try that bullshit here ************. You know good and damned well why they could not testify before the motherfucking congress. You know good and ******* well how they all refused the subpoenas and how Bolton took his to court. So **** that. If trumps ***** ass had been so motherfucking innocent he would not be blocking the witnesses that can prove it.

Bolton's subpoena was WITHDRAWN by Shifty Schiff.

It isn't up to a defendant to prove their innocence,its up to the prosecutors to show he's guilty.\

**** that excuse. When subpoenas are issued the people under subpoena must comply. Trump refused to allow that to happen. Your bullshit excuse of an "argument" fails on basic legal procedure. In a regular trial, everyone not honoring subpoenas would be arrested and trump would have been arrested for obstruction of justice because he did not allow witnesses under court order of subpoena to testify. So don't try that punk right wing crap argument here.

Yeah better get 4 years worth of tissues whilst the black community keeps rising despite your efforts to keep them down.

Jo

Lol! Nobody is rising under trump.

 

[Polishprince]

Everyone is aware of Biden & the Ukraine so if they elect him, the voters say it was OK.

that doesn't mean the law should be ignored.

It would be time for an Investigation, see if there is an impeachable offense.

There is no broken law to ignore as it pertains to Joe Biden.

Extortion and blackmail against the government of Ukraine

 

[IM2]

First, he'll run on "vindicated", which despite the squeals from the usual suspects will resonate with many uneducated voters. Then if he wins reelection, it will become possibly the most moot point in political history, discussed bitterly by a small handful of the never appeased in a corner where they reassure each other that "he WAS impeached, you know".

He won't be running on vindicated. Not when 70 percent of the country wanted witness testimony.

Oh, but he will. You don't know Trump if you think he won't, and it will resonate with the lightly involved who wonder what all the hatred is about when the House already had the opportunity to hear from and, <gasp> actually DID hear from witnesses.

But the witnesses the House heard from only testified to hearsay, double, triple and quadruple hearsay.

Or merely offered their opinions on foreign policy, and indicated how upset they were that President Trump kept them out of the loop because of their alleged leaking

No they didn't and on top of that trump blocked the witnesses with more direct evidence. So again. drop that bullshit lie of an argument. If trump had been innocent, he doesn't black witnesses.

Mueller had already exonerated Trump in his witch hunt,.

And as the President explained, he wasn't going to cooperate in any re-do's.

Mueller did not exonerate trump.

 

[colfax_m]

Everyone is aware of Biden & the Ukraine so if they elect him, the voters say it was OK.

Everyone is aware that Trump is bombastic, uncouth, vindictive and lies a lot, so since they elected him, the voters say it's OK.

I wish that were true but I’ve seen enough Trump supporters swear he doesn’t lie and it’s all the left wing media making it up.