GOP Could Impeach Biden If He Wins....Here We Go Down Stupid Lane

[Crepitus]

Joe Biden didn’t do anything as VP to get Hunter his position. If Burisma wants to pay him $80k a month, that’s their decision. It’s not your money so stop whining.

First of all, you don't know that. Secondly, it's less about Hunter than it is how it relates to the Obama administration and what Burisma got in return. So far, we know that it's very possible Joe stopped Shokin from throughly investigating Burisma.

Using your logic, Shokin probably was a Unicorn who was working to get the Tooth Fairy as the new leader of Ukraine. Or maybe, Shokin was vending Hotdogs and Biden got a bad one and Shokin's Hotdog Trailer had to go. See, I can make crap up as well.

Obviously you're new to politics. People don't do favors for somebody or some people without getting anything in return. Burisma hiring a drug addict who's the son of a VP didn't do that out of the kindness of their heart. They wanted to buy protection, and they got it. They used his name to try and setup meetings with the State department, and we have the emails to prove that.

Lol, nope. How was hiring him a favor to Joe?

They wanted the name association. Companies do that all the time. Nothing illegal about it.

That's your assumption. Let's hear it from the horse's mouth.

I believe he's addressed.this any number of.times.

 

[IM2]

Over what?

Nothing provable....just like Trump.

The point being that we don't need to be talking about that now...or ever...really.

It's stupid.

Lol, even most of the senators admit the Democrats proved their case.

They just said they are ok with it.

Horseshit.

They agree he said it. They didn't say they agree with Adam Schitt's interpretation.

BIngo.

And that's exactly why witnesses aren't necessary. The disagreement here is in regards to the interpretation of the undisputed evidence.

And based upon that evidence, there is more than a reasonable doubt that Trump is guilty. So he must be acquitted by Fair People on both sides of the aisle.

You have that backward. There is MORE than a reasonable doubt that Trump did nothing wrong and that the Democrats abused their role.

At least you're a chiefs fan. There is no doubt trump did wrong and the democrats did not abuse their role.

 

[IM2]

The real problem the libs have with President Trump has nothing to do with the Fake Articles of Impeachment.

They just don't like Trump's policies of Peace and Prosperity, but are afraid to attack them directly, so they invented some bullshit

Why has trump blocked witnesses and documents?

 

[Polishprince]

First of all, you don't know that. Secondly, it's less about Hunter than it is how it relates to the Obama administration and what Burisma got in return. So far, we know that it's very possible Joe stopped Shokin from throughly investigating Burisma.

Using your logic, Shokin probably was a Unicorn who was working to get the Tooth Fairy as the new leader of Ukraine. Or maybe, Shokin was vending Hotdogs and Biden got a bad one and Shokin's Hotdog Trailer had to go. See, I can make crap up as well.

Obviously you're new to politics. People don't do favors for somebody or some people without getting anything in return. Burisma hiring a drug addict who's the son of a VP didn't do that out of the kindness of their heart. They wanted to buy protection, and they got it. They used his name to try and setup meetings with the State department, and we have the emails to prove that.

Lol, nope. How was hiring him a favor to Joe?

They wanted the name association. Companies do that all the time. Nothing illegal about it.

That's your assumption. Let's hear it from the horse's mouth.

I believe he's addressed.this any number of.times.

Not under oath he hasn't. Hunter is being offered a priceless gift, an opportunity to prove his innocence

What does that say about him if he refuses? Why is he afraid?

 

[IM2]

Joe Biden Could Be Impeached by GOP Over Ukraine if He Wins, Iowa Senator Says

Well, we've had retarded (Adam Schitt).

And now we are talking counter retarded (Iowa Senator).

I would hope this really would not be the case.

America is fucked as it is.

Do we want to finish her off that much faster ?

Joe Biden will likely no be impeached as long as the House is dominated by Democrats. And the Democrat leadership has already announced how they plan to go after President Trump even harder following the Super Bowl. And that threat may start tomorrow because Nancy Pelosi likes beating up on President Trump more than she likes to legislate. And it's starting to sink in to me about how much the Democrat Party hates not pulling strings on everything. They were counting on all those billions of dollars in Joe Biden kickbacks since Trump went into office, and they're so blinded by lust for cheating other countries out of the money they voted on them for it appears to me they voted in too much money with the wink wink they get 2/3rds of it in kickbacks from their targeted corrupt government. They're so focused on picking somebody's pocket, they remind me of Chas. Dickens' quote "You have to pick a pocket or two."

​

That isn't what we should be concerned about.

Biden should not have to be threatened with this up front of collection of evidence. We know there is some...but no where near enough to show an impeachable offence.

This country just put up with Adam Schitt and Nancy Pisslosi. The GOP does not need to conjure up a counter facade.

The point is, there's no conjuring or conjecture about anything because it's all factual, clear evidence. It doesn't get much stronger as far as evidence than a public taped confession. Just call the trial, play the tape, then lock the asshole up.

There was no taped confession. And don't try talking about that video because that's not a confession. This is right wing manipulation of a videotape and it is disinformation done purposefully.

 

[Polishprince]

The real problem the libs have with President Trump has nothing to do with the Fake Articles of Impeachment.

They just don't like Trump's policies of Peace and Prosperity, but are afraid to attack them directly, so they invented some bullshit

Why has trump blocked witnesses and documents?

Actually, he didn't. President Trump cooperated completely and fully with Mueller's Witch Hunt.

And when he was finally exonerated, he said "that's it" , the libs don't get a re-do.

 

[IM2]

Using your logic, Shokin probably was a Unicorn who was working to get the Tooth Fairy as the new leader of Ukraine. Or maybe, Shokin was vending Hotdogs and Biden got a bad one and Shokin's Hotdog Trailer had to go. See, I can make crap up as well.

Obviously you're new to politics. People don't do favors for somebody or some people without getting anything in return. Burisma hiring a drug addict who's the son of a VP didn't do that out of the kindness of their heart. They wanted to buy protection, and they got it. They used his name to try and setup meetings with the State department, and we have the emails to prove that.

Lol, nope. How was hiring him a favor to Joe?

They wanted the name association. Companies do that all the time. Nothing illegal about it.

That's your assumption. Let's hear it from the horse's mouth.

I believe he's addressed.this any number of.times.

Not under oath he hasn't. Hunter is being offered a priceless gift, an opportunity to prove his innocence

What does that say about him if he refuses? Why is he afraid?

There was no crime to prove. And since you want witnesses why not Bolton, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pence, Pompeo, Trump, Parnas, Furman, Cipolini, Graham and Nunez?

 

[IM2]

The real problem the libs have with President Trump has nothing to do with the Fake Articles of Impeachment.

They just don't like Trump's policies of Peace and Prosperity, but are afraid to attack them directly, so they invented some bullshit

Why has trump blocked witnesses and documents?

Actually, he didn't. President Trump cooperated completely and fully with Mueller's Witch Hunt.

And when he was finally exonerated, he said "that's it" , the libs don't get a re-do.

That's a lie and I am talking about his blocking witnesses in this situation. OBTW, there was no exoneration.

 

[easyt65]

No it hasn't.

NUH-UH!

.....Another vicious fact-based tongue-lashing by another snowflake.

 

[easyt65]

Archer is Hunter’s long term friend and business partner. It’s not weird they would be golfing together.
Who is the 4th person? You said it was Hunter and two board members. You don’t know, do you.

So you DIDN'T do any real research at all...figures. Fail, snowflake. Remain ignorant. It's where you are most comfortable.

 

[Polishprince]

Obviously you're new to politics. People don't do favors for somebody or some people without getting anything in return. Burisma hiring a drug addict who's the son of a VP didn't do that out of the kindness of their heart. They wanted to buy protection, and they got it. They used his name to try and setup meetings with the State department, and we have the emails to prove that.

Lol, nope. How was hiring him a favor to Joe?

They wanted the name association. Companies do that all the time. Nothing illegal about it.

That's your assumption. Let's hear it from the horse's mouth.

I believe he's addressed.this any number of.times.

Not under oath he hasn't. Hunter is being offered a priceless gift, an opportunity to prove his innocence

What does that say about him if he refuses? Why is he afraid?

There was no crime to prove. And since you want witnesses why not Bolton, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pence, Pompeo, Trump, Parnas, Furman, Cipolini, Graham and Nunez?

None of those people were subpoenaed by Nadler or Schiff. Why not?

That was the time to build a case, it isn't the Senate's job to investigate.

BTW, since when are defense attorneys like Mr. Giuliani forced to testify ever?

 

[easyt65]

There is no doubt trump did wrong and the democrats did not abuse their role.

Thanks for that brainwashed OPINION. Too bad Democrat Constitutional Expert Jonathon Turley disagrees with you:




Turley Talking to Democrats During His Testimony before Schiff's House Intel Coup Committee hearing:

"If you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It's your abuse of power"

Turley To House Dems: If You Make Going To The Courts An Abuse Of Power, It Is "Your Abuse Of Power"



“I can’t emphasize this enough and I’ll say it just one more time: If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts; it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing precisely what you’re criticizing the president for doing. We have a third branch that deals with conflicts at the other two branches, and what comes out of there, what you do with it, is the very definition of legitimacy”
* Accusing others of doing what they have done and what they are doing, a staple for Democrats....

Jonathan Turley tells lawmakers if they impeach Trump, ‘It’s your abuse of power’





** THIS, BTW, is called providing links / evidence to support the FACTS, which you obviously do not recognize based on the fact that you never offer more than your highly self-impressed opinion.

 

[IM2]

Lol, nope. How was hiring him a favor to Joe?

They wanted the name association. Companies do that all the time. Nothing illegal about it.

That's your assumption. Let's hear it from the horse's mouth.

I believe he's addressed.this any number of.times.

Not under oath he hasn't. Hunter is being offered a priceless gift, an opportunity to prove his innocence

What does that say about him if he refuses? Why is he afraid?

There was no crime to prove. And since you want witnesses why not Bolton, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pence, Pompeo, Trump, Parnas, Furman, Cipolini, Graham and Nunez?

None of those people were subpoenaed by Nadler or Schiff. Why not?

That was the time to build a case, it isn't the Senate's job to investigate.

BTW, since when are defense attorneys like Mr. Giuliani forced to testify ever?

Don't try that bullshit here ************. You know good and damned well why they could not testify before the motherfucking congress. You know good and ******* well how they all refused the subpoenas and how Bolton took his to court. So **** that. If trumps ***** ass had been so motherfucking innocent he would not be blocking the witnesses that can prove it.

 

[hadit]

How did it work out for ya? Clinton's impeachment was bi-partisan. Trump's was not.

So what? Who cares? Get over it.

You care or you wouldn't have started a thread about it. Clinton actually committed a crime, Trump did not. See the difference, idiot?

Clinton crime? What, abuse of cigars?

No, perjury and obstruction of justice, moron.

Wait just a minute there Slick, we have been told for the entire Tramp impeachment hearings that obstruction is NOT a crime!
My how quickly the worm turns!!!!!

Obstruction of justice, or obstruction of Congress?

 

[IM2]

There is no doubt trump did wrong and the democrats did not abuse their role.

Thanks for that brainwashed OPINION. Too bad Democrat Constitutional Expert Jonathon Turley disagrees with you:




Turley Talking to Democrats During His Testimony before Schiff's House Intel Coup Committee hearing:

"If you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It's your abuse of power"

Turley To House Dems: If You Make Going To The Courts An Abuse Of Power, It Is "Your Abuse Of Power"



“I can’t emphasize this enough and I’ll say it just one more time: If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts; it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing precisely what you’re criticizing the president for doing. We have a third branch that deals with conflicts at the other two branches, and what comes out of there, what you do with it, is the very definition of legitimacy”
* Accusing others of doing what they have done and what they are doing, a staple for Democrats....

Jonathan Turley tells lawmakers if they impeach Trump, ‘It’s your abuse of power’

Turley is wrong and so are you. Turley was a republican witness. He was the only lawyer republicans could find that would argue in favor of trump.

 

[colfax_m]

Archer is Hunter’s long term friend and business partner. It’s not weird they would be golfing together.
Who is the 4th person? You said it was Hunter and two board members. You don’t know, do you.

So you DIDN'T do any real research at all...figures. Fail, snowflake. Remain ignorant. It's where you are most comfortable.

I did my research. That’s how I know you’re wrong. You posted the photo and made a claim. Back it ok. Who is the 4th person genius.

 

[hadit]

What “immunity”? If he was immune there would never had been an impeachment trial.

There WASN'T a trial! Only a whitewash.

House said they had all that was necessary when they impeached him on a partisan vote.

Why are you upset the Senate said they didn't, on a partisan vote?

Is being partisan only allowed for Democrats?

Because a lot more has come out since the Senate cover up. Remember Tramp has been obstructing Congress all along. But I agree the House should have investigated longer before voting on impeachment.

But I agree the House should have investigated longer before voting on impeachment.

Shame that Nadler, Schiff, and Pelosi wanted such an historic Christmas present.

Looks like their Christmas Cracker blew up in their faces.

Trump goes down as an Impeached President

Let him run on the sham that passed as a “trial”

First, he'll run on "vindicated", which despite the squeals from the usual suspects will resonate with many uneducated voters. Then if he wins reelection, it will become possibly the most moot point in political history, discussed bitterly by a small handful of the never appeased in a corner where they reassure each other that "he WAS impeached, you know".

 

[Polishprince]

That's your assumption. Let's hear it from the horse's mouth.

I believe he's addressed.this any number of.times.

Not under oath he hasn't. Hunter is being offered a priceless gift, an opportunity to prove his innocence

What does that say about him if he refuses? Why is he afraid?

There was no crime to prove. And since you want witnesses why not Bolton, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pence, Pompeo, Trump, Parnas, Furman, Cipolini, Graham and Nunez?

None of those people were subpoenaed by Nadler or Schiff. Why not?

That was the time to build a case, it isn't the Senate's job to investigate.

BTW, since when are defense attorneys like Mr. Giuliani forced to testify ever?

Don't try that bullshit here ************. You know good and damned well why they could not testify before the motherfucking congress. You know good and ******* well how they all refused the subpoenas and how Bolton took his to court. So **** that. If trumps ***** ass had been so motherfucking innocent he would not be blocking the witnesses that can prove it.

Bolton's subpoena was WITHDRAWN by Shifty Schiff.

It isn't up to a defendant to prove their innocence,its up to the prosecutors to show he's guilty.\

 

[easyt65]

Turley is wrong....

If YOU , as you claim, are more intelligent regarding the Constitution than Constitutional Expert Jonathon Turley and Constitutional Expert legend Allen Dershowitz, why have we never heard of you, seen you on any of the Liberal MSM news shows, and why didn't Schiff call YOU to testify.....?

I guess because outside of your TDS-suffering little mind you are no Constitutional expert.

 

[BlindBoo]

So what? All any president needs is 34 dedicated followers in the Senate and the opposition party can't touch him.

Besides the GOP has to win the House again in order to impeach a Democrat