GOP Congress Plans To Deal With ISIS

[Discombobulated]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

 

[Manonthestreet]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

 

[Discombobulated]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

 

[The Rabbi]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

Congress does not set foreign policy, doofus. That would be the President of the United States. And every foreign policy set by this president has been an abject failure.

 

[Discombobulated]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

Congress does not set foreign policy, doofus. That would be the President of the United States. And every foreign policy set by this president has been an abject failure.

Since when do we make war without Congressional approval?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Carpet bomb and nuke. Exterinate the ISIS!

 

[The Rabbi]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

Congress does not set foreign policy, doofus. That would be the President of the United States. And every foreign policy set by this president has been an abject failure.

Since when do we make war without Congressional approval?

Actually almost every war has been without congressional approval. Who submits the plan to be approved, Einstein?
And your question of course was irrelevant to my statement. The president makes foreign policy and conducts war as CinC.

 

[idb]

Carpet bomb and nuke. Exterinate the ISIS!

Brilliant!!!

 

[Manonthestreet]

SO you want to go back to Iraq?

No, I want the Republican controlled Congress to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities, instead of running for cover while jeering from the sidelines.

Simply because there is no debate doesnt mean they havent. Choice to go to Syria was alrdy nixed once and yet Obama keeps pushing it.

 

[Discombobulated]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

Congress does not set foreign policy, doofus. That would be the President of the United States. And every foreign policy set by this president has been an abject failure.

Since when do we make war without Congressional approval?

Actually almost every war has been without congressional approval. Who submits the plan to be approved, Einstein?
And your question of course was irrelevant to my statement. The president makes foreign policy and conducts war as CinC.

Oh I see professor, so conducting operations in another country like Syria doesn't require congressional approval....is that right? Because we don't need congressional approval to attack what ever sovereign nation we choose.....right professor? How convenient for Congress.
Begs the question: Why do Republican law makers hate the Constitution so much?

 

[Katzndogz]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

Congress does not set foreign policy, doofus. That would be the President of the United States. And every foreign policy set by this president has been an abject failure.

Since when do we make war without Congressional approval?

Since when does Congress aporove something where no one has asked for approval ?

 

[Discombobulated]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

Congress does not set foreign policy, doofus. That would be the President of the United States. And every foreign policy set by this president has been an abject failure.

Since when do we make war without Congressional approval?

Since when does Congress aporove something where no one has asked for approval ?

Plenty of Republicans in Congress criticizing the President's policy as not being aggressive enough.......let's here what they'd like to do about it. After all, it is their Constitutional responsibility.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If you want to hurt ISIS you have to deal with their leadership: Obama and Val Jarrett

 

[blackhawk]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

What actions do you think the Congress can take? The last I checked only the CIC also known as the President could order military action or a troop deployment against ISIS.

 

[Discombobulated]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

What actions do you think the Congress can take? The last I checked only the CIC also known as the President could order military action or a troop deployment against ISIS.

Since we are already at war in Syria without Congressional approval shouldn't the Congress now be legally obliged to act? Shouldn't they at least approve or disapprove the President's actions? Or should the Congress only act on issues that present no danger of political consequences?

 

[tinydancer]

So who is going to act and wage war against Syria?

Declare.

We go from there.

I'm planning on rioting up here against my dearly loved Prime Minister.

 

[tinydancer]

If my PM and your President decide to declare war against Syria I will riot.

 

[Discombobulated]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

What actions do you think the Congress can take? The last I checked only the CIC also known as the President could order military action or a troop deployment against ISIS.

I don't know what you imagine you checked but it certainly wasn't the Constitution.

 

[The Rabbi]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

Congress does not set foreign policy, doofus. That would be the President of the United States. And every foreign policy set by this president has been an abject failure.

Since when do we make war without Congressional approval?

Actually almost every war has been without congressional approval. Who submits the plan to be approved, Einstein?
And your question of course was irrelevant to my statement. The president makes foreign policy and conducts war as CinC.

Oh I see professor, so conducting operations in another country like Syria doesn't require congressional approval....is that right? Because we don't need congressional approval to attack what ever sovereign nation we choose.....right professor? How convenient for Congress.
Begs the question: Why do Republican law makers hate the Constitution so much?

You are one ignorant piece of shit for sure.
Are you suggesting the President does not set foreign policy? Are you suggesting the President is not Commander in Chief?
Quit deflecting, moving goalposts, and lying. Be honest for once in your life.

 

[The Rabbi]

The GOP controlled Congress will do nothing about ISIS. They will take every opportunity to score political points while criticizing the President's policies......but they will take no action of their own. They won't seek to authorize any kind of actions in Iraq or Syria, the Republican controlled Congress plans to stay as far away as they can get from taking any actual responsibility for anything. They certainly won't debate about this country going to war; the Republican Congress will do what ever they can to avoid their Constitutional responsibilities.

Congress does not set foreign policy, doofus. That would be the President of the United States. And every foreign policy set by this president has been an abject failure.

Since when do we make war without Congressional approval?

Since when does Congress aporove something where no one has asked for approval ?

Plenty of Republicans in Congress criticizing the President's policy as not being aggressive enough.......let's here what they'd like to do about it. After all, it is their Constitutional responsibility.

It is not their constititional responsibility. They are certainly free to criticize the president's handling of foreign policy, which has been a total, complete, utter, and abject failure.
And his ISIS policy is no different.
The better question is: What will Obama do now that his policy has failed?