BBCAmerica
Active Member
- May 23, 2012
- 473
- 74
- 28
- Thread starter
- #21
So because ACORN has a history of fraud then the blatant potential for fraud on a massive scale by this company should be over looked?No hope for the Democrat fraudsters, considering their record.
In 2009, after various allegations of criminal activity, a number of Democrats who once advertised their connections to ACORN began to distance themselves, as Republicans began to use the ACORN allegations to portray Democrats as corrupt.[107] In immediate response to the 2009 video controversy, the United States House and Senate, by wide margins, attached amendments to pending spending legislation that would temporarily prohibit the federal government from funding ACORN, or any agency that had been involved in similar scandals including money authorized by previous legislation.
So it's not really about elections being stolen and our votes being hijacked, It's more about who does it? What are you first a republican or an American?
No it's about who has a history of voter fraud. Acorn does, Hart Intercivic does not.
WOW!!! Are you serious? Those machines are "notoriously faulty" and can not be monitored. Further more with all the problems in Ohio. Why the need for new machines? What was wrong with last years machines