Google admits the Biden regime ordered them to censor free speech, thanks the GOP for exposing it

marvin martian

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Messages
52,122
Reaction score
77,970
Points
3,488
Location
Texas Hill Country
Something we all knew was going on, and it's finally confirmed.

Too little, too late, of course.

It would have been nice for Google to have some balls and say no to the fascist Biden regime at the time, but they didn't.







1758641409210.webp
 
Something we all knew was going on, and it's finally confirmed.

Too little, too late, of course.

It would have been nice for Google to have some balls and say no to the fascist Biden regime at the time, but they didn't.







View attachment 1165366

It makes having Jimmy temporarily lose his show look like the biggest joke to mankind, doesn't it
 
Safe and effective was a required media distribution . Far more destructive than anything Trump has said or done including the spanking of Kimmel
 
Sure, take your medical advice from a former game show host and a heroin addict that has worms in his brain.

Good luck.

You killed 300 people, running around thinking you were "immune" from Covid, because Joe Biden and Big Pharma billionaires lied to you.
 
You killed 300 people, running around thinking you were "immune" from Covid, because Joe Biden and Big Pharma billionaires lied to you.
Funny.
How do you figure people were immune from COVID?
Herd immunity?
 
If corrupt Democrat rat bastards ever get a choke hold on power they will turn us into a Russia/China like state controlled shithole.
 
Something we all knew was going on, and it's finally confirmed.

Too little, too late, of course.

It would have been nice for Google to have some balls and say no to the fascist Biden regime at the time, but they didn't.







View attachment 1165366

"Biden officials demanded takedowns of legal speech."

No they didn't.

Supreme Court allows White House to request removal of misinformation on social media​

The U.S. Supreme Court handed a major victory for the Biden administration Wednesday, throwing out a lower court ruling that had placed major restrictions on the ability of government officials to communicate with social media companies about their content moderation policies.

While the court's ruling was procedural, it was nonetheless a stark repudiation of two lower courts in the South, and their eagerness to embrace conspiracy theories about alleged government coercion of social media companies.


You should know by now Gym Jordan is a lying cuck.
 
"Biden officials demanded takedowns of legal speech."

No they didn't.

Supreme Court allows White House to request removal of misinformation on social media​

The U.S. Supreme Court handed a major victory for the Biden administration Wednesday, throwing out a lower court ruling that had placed major restrictions on the ability of government officials to communicate with social media companies about their content moderation policies.

While the court's ruling was procedural, it was nonetheless a stark repudiation of two lower courts in the South, and their eagerness to embrace conspiracy theories about alleged government coercion of social media companies.


NPR? Really?

LOL
 
NPR? Really?

LOL
Writing for a liberal-conservative coalition of six justices, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that neither the five individuals nor the two states who sued the government had legal standing to be in court at all. She said they presented no proof to back up their claims that the government had pressured social media companies like Twitter and Facebook into restricting their speech. "Unfortunately," she said, the Fifth Circuit court of appeals "relied on factual findings that are "clearly erroneous."

How frustrating it must be for you to spend all that time on a post that's a worthless piece of garbage.
 
This belongs in the no shit Sherlock archive. Only Bidenbots would say the administration never colluded with social media companies to shut down opposing voices.
Writing for a liberal-conservative coalition of six justices, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that neither the five individuals nor the two states who sued the government had legal standing to be in court at all. She said they presented no proof to back up their claims that the government had pressured social media companies like Twitter and Facebook into restricting their speech. "Unfortunately," she said, the Fifth Circuit court of appeals "relied on factual findings that are "clearly erroneous."

ACB is a "Bidenbot?"
 
15th post
When you can't refute substance of the OP, just ignore it and deflect.
I didn't refute the substance, dumb ass.

Europe has every right to block crackpot theories on COVID.

"Drink gasoline, it cures liver cancer".

Should that be allowed on Google?
 
Some of us never got Covid, even though everyone around us did. Why would anyone immune want to take an experimental treatment?
Some people don't get a cold, while everyone else in the house has it.

That doesn't make you immune.

Is every flu vaccine, "experimental"?

A new vaccine comes out every year.
 
Back
Top Bottom