Goodbye CDC, Goodbye Country

Do you smoke? does smoking cause lung cancer?
No it doesn't "cause" lung cancer; it increases the risk that you will contract the disease....If it caused cancer, everyone who ever smoked would get cancer.

If you ******* lemmings can't even get important distinctions as this correct, why should anyone believe any of the other ignorant bullshit you spew?
 
Well suck on this, ******* cultist....

BREAKING: Three Peer-Reviewed Studies Provide Irrefutable Grounds for Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA Injections​



  • Genomic forensics: SARS-CoV-2 and mRNA injections display signatures of laboratory manipulation — furin cleavage site, HIV-like inserts, SEB superantigen motifs, ENaC epitope, DC-SIGN receptors.
  • These features match DARPA’s 2018 DEFUSE proposal. Fauci and Farrar’s Feb. 1, 2020 teleconference sought to suppress discussion of these engineered elements, coordinating the “proximal origin” cover-up.
  • NATO scientists rated SARS-CoV-2 the 4th most attractive bioweapon candidate out of 34 agents.
  • Both the virus and the mRNA injections represent violations of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).
  • Cardiovascular: +510% myocarditis risk (99M cohort); +286% heart attacks, +240% strokes, +199% arrhythmias (85M cohort).
  • Autopsies (325 cases): High likelihood of direct causal link between vaccination and death.
  • Life expectancy loss: Two-dose recipients lost 37% of expected lifespan in follow-up studies.
  • Reproductive: Pfizer’s 2021 report showed 81% miscarriage rate in early pregnancies; NEJM reanalysis confirmed 82% loss rate, comparable to abortion drugs. Stillbirths and neonatal deaths were several-fold higher than baseline.
  • Immune collapse: >90% of vaccine-injured retirees showed latent virus reactivation (EBV, CMV, HHV-6, HSV, Borrelia); ~75% had autoimmune markers.
  • Cancer: Surge in aggressive tumors (digestive, brain, breast) linked to IgG4 tolerance, p53 disruption, DNA contamination, and mistranslation from modified nucleosides.
  • Military readiness:Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) showed:
    • +153% myocarditis (2023),
    • +46% digestive cancers,
    • +262% obesity,
    • +867% slip/trip/fall injuries,
    • +85% suicidal/homicidal ideation.
  • Nearly 95,000 service members separated under mandates, undermining readiness.
View attachment 1155927

What does that post establish? I examined it and it cites a blog (pretending to be a scientific journal) edited by James Lyons-Weiler:

1756481905828.webp


I can make any wild claim I want and readily find some web page or blog to "prove" that what I say is true, as I said you're stupid.
 
What does that post establish? I examined it and it cites a blog (pretending to be a scientific journal) edited by James Lyons-Weiler:

View attachment 1155930

I can make any wild claim I want and readily find some web page or blog to "prove" that what I say is true, as I said you're stupid.
Refute the findings, assclown cultist.
 
No it doesn't "cause" lung cancer; it increases the risk that you will contract the disease....If it caused cancer, everyone who ever smoked would get cancer.
Precisely and that's why I asked, because theHawk said:

"to address the root cause".

If you ******* lemmings can't even get important distinctions as this correct, why should anyone believe any of the other ignorant bullshit you spew?
Tell that to theHawk
 
You're hysterical, just another uneducated irrelevant little conspiracy fantasist, probably a grimy little incel as well.

So Bill Gates is going to be charged with genocide now?

You ******* dipshit.
You are gullible sir. A dues-paying member of the Church Of The Poisoned Mind.
 
Refute the findings, assclown cultist.
Why? you're certainly not interested in truth or facts, you're goal is to hate and lie and propagate idiocy because you want to appear relevant.
 
"I got nothing" involves fewer keystrokes.
I have all I need, an open mind plus decades of working in a science and rationality based discipline.

You'll see that statement as hostile I bet, because it "excludes" you and so you have tantrums, feeling relevant is all you care about.
 
Your mind is closed tighter than the vault at Fort Knox, and you wouldn't know rationality if it kicked you in your tiny little beanbag.
I'm far cleverer than you and that just eats you up doesn't it hickbilly boy? get back to the moonshine distillation, at least you'll be doing some very basic science.
 
Last edited:
So wait, now you're saying that the FDA is making it too hard to approve drugs? Jesus, you guys really need to figure out an actual policy position because the current administration is saying that big pharma is steamrolling the FDA and just getting everything pushed through without proper checking.

Guess what happened to Peter Marks? He was forced out by RFK Jr in April.

Over time the process has become bloated beyond the original intent.

That's what happens when you remove lawmaking from regulation and leave it entirely to the regulators.
 
I'm far cleverer than you and that just eats you up doesn't it hickbilly boy, get back to the moonshine distillation, at least you'll be doing some very basic science.
Run on sentence much? Most adults don’t combine questions and statements like that. Well done.
 
Over time the process has become bloated beyond the original intent.

That's what happens when you remove lawmaking from regulation and leave it entirely to the regulators.
Your uniformed opinion is pretty worthless.

What happens when you leave all regulation to a crackpot like RFK Jr? You dipshits really don't give a shit because you'll always be able to come up with some excuse to blame someone else.
 
Your uniformed opinion is pretty worthless.

What happens when you leave all regulation to a crackpot like RFK Jr? You dipshits really don't give a shit because you'll always be able to come up with some excuse to blame someone else.

Worth more than yours. Mine shows patterns of thought. You just regurgitate progspeak.

LOL, there are so many regs he could have 50 years and not get through all of them. That's part of the problem.
 
15th post
Worth more than yours. Mine shows patterns of thought. You just regurgitate progspeak.

LOL, there are so many regs he could have 50 years and not get through all of them. That's part of the problem.
Yes, it does show a pattern of thought. Your pattern is to stick to the Trump approved narrative about the "evil deep state" and sanitize the crazy and destructive shit done by the crackpots your daddy let into government.

You can't even keep a consistent story, because according to RFK Jr, the regulations aren't strict enough because they let through all kinds of toxic chemicals and drugs.

Your pattern is only consistent in one way, attack anyone that challenges your daddy.
 
Here's something even most magats prefer to forget, the day trump became an innovator:



Now the same buffoon is deciding who is the United States' secretary of health and all of his loyal cultists applaud and congratulate themselves.

Sad.
 
Last edited:

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom