Good Question.Will Climate Change Back To Global Warming Through September Again?

[Crepitus]

I'm sorry, that is incorrect. It was an attempt to get certain less intelligent people to understand what is happening.

No, it was to help hoodwink ego-driven people who are more concerned with fitting in with an ostensibly more intelligent group than they are with reality.

I'm afraid you are incorrect. It was to help.you understand. Sadly your group still wasn't able to comprehend.

I have no group. I think for myself.
You are obsessed with acceptance into a group. That’s how the AGW alarmists are so successful with their propaganda.

Lol, everybody know conspiracy theories are about belonging to a "select" group. About feeling you are part of the "in the know" crowd.

"Not part of a group", lmao.

Sure you are. You just parrot the propaganda and disparage dissent.

Huh? Did you not understand my post?

 

[Rustic]

How come it's always the dumb arse Neocons whackadoodles who don't believe climate change is happening

Lol
There is climate change, there always is climate change… It’s just not man-made

 

[percysunshine]

So what is your scientific background?

Where did I claim to be a scientist?

Did not claim you did.

So you are just reading stuff, but have no understanding of the underlying science.

Just checking.

Don't be stupid. Not having a degree in climatology doesn't mean I can't understand what I read about it, or hear about it, and make informed decisions based on what I have learned.

I'm not some homeschooled conservitard after all.

Actually, a degree in physics with a specialty in numerical simulations of non-linear dynamic systems would be better than climatology.

Be positive about the whole situation. As much time as you have spent reading about and debating the topic, you could smoke Al Gore if there were a pop quiz on the subject.

You aren't bothering to dispute anything

So what is your scientific background?

Where did I claim to be a scientist?

Did not claim you did.

So you are just reading stuff, but have no understanding of the underlying science.

Just checking.

Don't be stupid. Not having a degree in climatology doesn't mean I can't understand what I read about it, or hear about it, and make informed decisions based on what I have learned.

I'm not some homeschooled conservitard after all.

Actually, a degree in physics with a specialty in numerical simulations of non-linear dynamic systems would be better than climatology.

Be positive about the whole situation. As much time as you have spent reading about and debating the topic, you could smoke Al Gore if there were a pop quiz on the subject.

None of that has anything to do with the subject at hand. Are you going to try to dispute anything I said or just make lame attempts to belittle me?

The science has everything to do with the subject at hand. Politicized science always ends in trouble for everyone.

Also, it was not that lame...not really.

 

[Rustic]

Peer reviewed, is pure bullshit...

 

[Crepitus]

Where did I claim to be a scientist?

Did not claim you did.

So you are just reading stuff, but have no understanding of the underlying science.

Just checking.

Don't be stupid. Not having a degree in climatology doesn't mean I can't understand what I read about it, or hear about it, and make informed decisions based on what I have learned.

I'm not some homeschooled conservitard after all.

Actually, a degree in physics with a specialty in numerical simulations of non-linear dynamic systems would be better than climatology.

Be positive about the whole situation. As much time as you have spent reading about and debating the topic, you could smoke Al Gore if there were a pop quiz on the subject.

You aren't bothering to dispute anything

Where did I claim to be a scientist?

Did not claim you did.

So you are just reading stuff, but have no understanding of the underlying science.

Just checking.

Don't be stupid. Not having a degree in climatology doesn't mean I can't understand what I read about it, or hear about it, and make informed decisions based on what I have learned.

I'm not some homeschooled conservitard after all.

Actually, a degree in physics with a specialty in numerical simulations of non-linear dynamic systems would be better than climatology.

Be positive about the whole situation. As much time as you have spent reading about and debating the topic, you could smoke Al Gore if there were a pop quiz on the subject.

None of that has anything to do with the subject at hand. Are you going to try to dispute anything I said or just make lame attempts to belittle me?

The science has everything to do with the subject at hand. Politicized science always ends in trouble for everyone.

Also, it was not that lame...not really.

No, not really it doesn't. Are you claiming these degrees? If so I have to say I seriously doubt your honesty. Almost all educated people understand climate change is real.

 

[Rustic]

Did not claim you did.

So you are just reading stuff, but have no understanding of the underlying science.

Just checking.

Don't be stupid. Not having a degree in climatology doesn't mean I can't understand what I read about it, or hear about it, and make informed decisions based on what I have learned.

I'm not some homeschooled conservitard after all.

Actually, a degree in physics with a specialty in numerical simulations of non-linear dynamic systems would be better than climatology.

Be positive about the whole situation. As much time as you have spent reading about and debating the topic, you could smoke Al Gore if there were a pop quiz on the subject.

You aren't bothering to dispute anything

Did not claim you did.

So you are just reading stuff, but have no understanding of the underlying science.

Just checking.

Don't be stupid. Not having a degree in climatology doesn't mean I can't understand what I read about it, or hear about it, and make informed decisions based on what I have learned.

I'm not some homeschooled conservitard after all.

Actually, a degree in physics with a specialty in numerical simulations of non-linear dynamic systems would be better than climatology.

Be positive about the whole situation. As much time as you have spent reading about and debating the topic, you could smoke Al Gore if there were a pop quiz on the subject.

None of that has anything to do with the subject at hand. Are you going to try to dispute anything I said or just make lame attempts to belittle me?

The science has everything to do with the subject at hand. Politicized science always ends in trouble for everyone.

Also, it was not that lame...not really.

No, not really it doesn't. Are you claiming these degrees? If so I have to say I seriously doubt your honesty. Almost all educated people understand climate change is real.

...and it’s not man made. Simple as that

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No, it was to help hoodwink ego-driven people who are more concerned with fitting in with an ostensibly more intelligent group than they are with reality.

I'm afraid you are incorrect. It was to help.you understand. Sadly your group still wasn't able to comprehend.

I have no group. I think for myself.
You are obsessed with acceptance into a group. That’s how the AGW alarmists are so successful with their propaganda.

Lol, everybody know conspiracy theories are about belonging to a "select" group. About feeling you are part of the "in the know" crowd.

"Not part of a group", lmao.

Sure you are. You just parrot the propaganda and disparage dissent.

Huh? Did you not understand my post?

You’re concerned with belonging to a group and I’m not. Very simple.

 

[percysunshine]

Did not claim you did.

So you are just reading stuff, but have no understanding of the underlying science.

Just checking.

Don't be stupid. Not having a degree in climatology doesn't mean I can't understand what I read about it, or hear about it, and make informed decisions based on what I have learned.

I'm not some homeschooled conservitard after all.

Actually, a degree in physics with a specialty in numerical simulations of non-linear dynamic systems would be better than climatology.

Be positive about the whole situation. As much time as you have spent reading about and debating the topic, you could smoke Al Gore if there were a pop quiz on the subject.

You aren't bothering to dispute anything

Did not claim you did.

So you are just reading stuff, but have no understanding of the underlying science.

Just checking.

Don't be stupid. Not having a degree in climatology doesn't mean I can't understand what I read about it, or hear about it, and make informed decisions based on what I have learned.

I'm not some homeschooled conservitard after all.

Actually, a degree in physics with a specialty in numerical simulations of non-linear dynamic systems would be better than climatology.

Be positive about the whole situation. As much time as you have spent reading about and debating the topic, you could smoke Al Gore if there were a pop quiz on the subject.

None of that has anything to do with the subject at hand. Are you going to try to dispute anything I said or just make lame attempts to belittle me?

The science has everything to do with the subject at hand. Politicized science always ends in trouble for everyone.

Also, it was not that lame...not really.

No, not really it doesn't. Are you claiming these degrees? If so I have to say I seriously doubt your honesty. Almost all educated people understand climate change is real.

Geophysics, with a specialty in seismic numerical simulations.

Define educated.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Why is it that the left seems to talk about "Climate Change" in the fall/winter/spring,,then come mid-june/July,,all of a sudden we are experiencing "Global Warming". Right?
And don't be surprised if they start this up again once many of the 57 degrees start getting into the 90's soon.

You know the term "climate change" only came about because certain people are too stupid to realize global warming can cause cooler temperatures in some places occasionally right?

Oh please, George's 1984 came true.. you and the left is living proof

.

 

[Dr Grump]

Prove me wrong

he doesn't need to prove anything to you. You're a moron. All intelligent people agree with the scientists. Only conspiracy theorists, Neocon wing nuts and hacks don't believe in it. Which categories do you fall under?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Why is it that the left seems to talk about "Climate Change" in the fall/winter/spring,,then come mid-june/July,,all of a sudden we are experiencing "Global Warming". Right?
And don't be surprised if they start this up again once many of the 57 degrees start getting into the 90's soon.

You know the term "climate change" only came about because certain people are too stupid to realize global warming can cause cooler temperatures in some places occasionally right?

No, it came about to accommodate inaccurate info in order to perpetuate the AGW propaganda.
AGW is ‘warming’ -only and it’s based on greenhouse effect theory. Not cooling or atmospheric evaporational theory.

I'm sorry, that is incorrect. It was an attempt to get certain less intelligent people to understand what is happening.

Most scientists disagree with you

Lol, 3% is far from most my gullible friend.

Your 3 % are idiots who are bought and paid for whores..

Legates Et Al put it into perspective when Cook lied about the "97%" bull shit...

Out of 11944 papers they took 77 that fit their narrative and ignored the rest that said their narrative was bull shit. Why would you left tards lie like that? Because your fantasy is a lie..

I just love that left wing propagandist..

 

[Billy_Bob]

When you can I will lol

You cannot. Only complete morons are still denying that climate change is real.

Not many scientists fall into that category.

You and your idiot friends do though.

Most scientists disagree with you

Show them to us. Back up your ridiculous bullshit for a change. Show us a few real scientists who disagree with me.

Google it

Google says 97% of scientists agree with me.

Your turn

Google LIED just like you!!!

 

[Billy_Bob]

Peer reviewed, is pure bullshit...

I agree...

The alarmists throw out science that disproves their meme. Cook threw away 11944 peer reviewed papers because they didn't fit his narrative...

 

[Billy_Bob]

Prove me wrong

he doesn't need to prove anything to you. You're a moron. All intelligent people agree with the scientists. Only conspiracy theorists, Neocon wing nuts and hacks don't believe in it. Which categories do you fall under?

Post up the empirical evidence that proves the warming we have seen is man made and can not be natural variation.

As all you have done is throw out adhoms and personal attacks you haven't proven jack shit.

 

[Billy_Bob]

How come it's always the dumb arse Neocons whackadoodles who don't believe climate change is happening

Why is it dumb ass liberals always eat every piece of horse shit they are feed?

The climate has been changing for over 4.5 Billion years. Only you idiots think what we see today is "normal".... BZZZZZTT WRONG AGAIN... You lose...

Here is the last 450 thousand years and were about done with this interglacial... And its about to get very cold...

 

[Pilot1]

As we approach June, the climate is getting warmer in my area. What can I do to stop it?

 

[Jitss617]

Prove me wrong

he doesn't need to prove anything to you. You're a moron. All intelligent people agree with the scientists. Only conspiracy theorists, Neocon wing nuts and hacks don't believe in it. Which categories do you fall under?

I know but there are more scientists that believe the same thing in do! And they don’t get grants from democrats to repeat talking points

 

[RealDave]

Why is it that the left seems to talk about "Climate Change" in the fall/winter/spring,,then come mid-june/July,,all of a sudden we are experiencing "Global Warming". Right?
And don't be surprised if they start this up again once many of the 57 degrees start getting into the 90's soon.

Why is it you ******* morons can't get that Global Warming is a type of Climate Change..

BTW if we call it Global Warming you idiots keep posting about how cold it is on a particular day.

Its called science. Maybe you should learn about it.

 

[skookerasbil]

Climate change or global warming......doesnt matter. Nobody cares.........a boatload of evidence to support it too.

The public has known about " the science" for 20 years. And this has led to how much climate change action?

Liberals have been taking bows in front of their "Weather is not climate" billboard for 10 years.....hasnt amounted to dick in the public policy arena!!

@www.whosnotwinning.com

 

[skookerasbil]

Welp....that's the conclusion of this thread!!

Symbolic shit is ghey.....it all comes down to who's winning?