playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 58,493
- 52,040
- 3,645
See what I mean ?
no.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See what I mean ?
YEAH ? And what so-called "lie"was that ?Shut up dummy. You made up a lie and posted it. You know you did.
I quoted it.
You made a lie up out of thin air to soothe yourself and to hide from reality.
Of course not. You're a leftwinger. The only thing you can see is what your leftwing media feeds you, 24/7.
Anything to show the OP isn’t correct, Simp?Breitbart – Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as numerous false claims.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Breitbart - Bias and Credibility
No, it's NOT enough said. You backed away from addressing the CONTENT.steve bannon used to run that show.
'nuff said.
whilst MSNBC is quite the lefty left left rating - are you saying they aren't?
i said they endorsed the BILL.
I don't fee the sealions, sorry.YEAH ? And what so-called "lie"was that ?
Hollie coming out strong.Tell us about the residents who had no say in thousands of Haitians dumped in their town and now have to deal with crime and overcrowded schools.
Yes, yes. We know only a total ban on the browns would satisfy you.Correct, it was nothing but an illegal immigration empowerment bill, masquerading as immigration reform.
Here is a FACT CHECK on the fact checkers.
Dozens of Springfield residents went to their city council and complained about Haitians killing and eating cats and decapitating ducks & geese. Seeing this as politically damaging to Kamala Harris, the media, with no evidence , and the local police and politicians, also based on nothing, have heralded these complaints as false.
Never mind that these officials have no way of knowing whether this is really happening, and that actual residents of Springfield claim that it is indeed happening, the point is to shame anyone who dares to notice the problems that arise when you inundate a community with foreigners from the Third World.
And of course it’s not just the slaughtering of animals that’s a problem in Springfield. The local community health clinic, for example, has been overwhelmed with Haitian patients in recent years, with a 13-fold increase from 2021 to 2023, from 115 to 1,500 according to the New York Times. The public school system had to hire two dozen Haitian-Creole interpreters and now spends ten times more on translation services compared to four years ago because so many school children are Haitians who don’t speak English. Because of the rapid population increase in Springfield, housing costs have skyrocketed, with many local residents priced out because of newly-arrived Haitians willing to pay more in rent.
whatever the truth behind the cats and ducks memes, the reality is that Springfield is being destroyed by mass immigration. Residents have taken to social media to complain about all kinds of bizarre incidents, from unlicensed and uninsured Haitian drivers demanding payment after causing traffic accidents, to grown men taking naked sink baths in women’s restrooms at a grocery store, to homeless Haitian migrants camping out on people’s lawns.
These are real problems, not racist memes. But why are so many Haitians here in the U.S. to begin with? Because the Biden-Harris administration let them in. Many Haitians were let in through a policy that allowed those arrested after crossing the border illegally to be paroled into the country. “Paroled into the country” is just a jargon-y way of saying they were released from federal custody on their own recognizance, free to go wherever they want in the U.S.
Not only that, but as Harris herself has bragged, some 300,000 Haitians were granted Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, by the Biden-Harris administration. TPS is a giant scam of a federal program that allows huge numbers of foreigners to remain in the U.S. indefinitely. Under the Biden-Harris administration, it has expanded dramatically. Created in 1990 to help refugees fleeing El Salvador’s civil war, TPS was supposed to be, as its name implies, temporary. But that’s not how it has worked out. In 1991, Liberians were granted TPS because of a civil war. Nicaraguans and Hondurans were added to the TPS ranks after Hurricane Mitch in 1999. And of course Haitians were given TPS in 2011 for the earthquake that hit Haiti the year before. Most of these people have never left the U.S.
In other words, TPS is temporary in name only. Under successive administrations, both Republican and Democrat, it has become a permanent entitlement. During his term in office, Trump tried to end TPS for various groups, like the 200,000 Salvadorans who’d been granted TPS status for an earthquake that happened in 2001. But Trump’s efforts were delayed, first by bureaucrats within his own Department of Homeland Security and then by activists and the courts until Biden came into office and restored it. That means the 300,000 Haitians that Biden-Harris granted TPS are here to stay, barring the total dissolution of TPS under a future Trump administration.
In the meantime, communities like Springfield will be transformed by the mass influx of foreigners and foreign customs, many of which are hostile to and incompatible with our American way of life. It’s not racist or xenophobic to admit that, it’s simply the truth. People from other cultures and different parts of the world live differently than we do. It should not be too much to ask that if they come here, to the United States, that they adopt our culture and way of life. That they refrain, let’s say, from taking ducks and geese from our municipal parks and decapitating them for vodoo rituals.
If You Want Haitians Eating Cats In Your Town, Vote For Harris
For our managerial leadership class, the purpose of mass immigration is to dissolve the American people and create another.thefederalist.com
You missed the obvious. Go figure.Like I said "fooling yourself"..
Why would there be bomb threats if they hadn’tTrump and Vance called in some bomb threats? Really?
So now that that’s out of the way, do you have an actual answer to my question ?
Also, did the people who made the threats say that was the reason they made them? I’ve not seen anything on who or why they made the threats.
Legal?They aren't Americans. They are here on temporary protected status. You know what temporary means.
Maybe the fact that there are over 20,000 of them in Ohio?Why would there be bomb threats if they hadn’t
Lied about the Haitians?
What other event of that scale precipitated them?
Breitbart – Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as numerous false claims.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Breitbart - Bias and Credibility
Knucklehead dealing with hurt feelings.Hollie coming out strong.
So resentful.
Media bias fact check is a safe place for leftists who view any news they don't see on the Joy Reid Clown Show as "right wing".A thing. about media bias fact check..they themselves are left slanted. If you go through and look at a bunch of different ratings for different sites, you’ll find that they list most right wing sites as “questionable” and give them bad ratings, and they give most of the left wing sites “mixed” or “good” ratings. They’re not biased at all!
Why shouldn't she be ?Hollie coming out strong.
So resentful.
8omeday maybe we'll figure out what liberals are talking about, but I'm not looking forward to it.I don't fee the sealions, sorry.
Hint: you're in a thread about it
Too bad the FBI doesn’t have jurisdiction in Chile. Otherwise, it could protect Haitians from people with racist attitudes like Meza.The Chilean Congress has passed a law [that] criminalizes the slaughter, distribution, and commercialization of the meat of pets and companion animals. …
This measure arises from reports about the consumption of dog and cat meat in certain foreign communities within the country, particularly the Haitian community, according to [Chilean congressman] José Carlos Meza, the bill’s author.
I AM a "brown" you idiot.Yes, yes. We know only a total ban on the browns would satisfy you.