Good news for Jack Smith.

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
90,099
Reaction score
81,886
Points
3,615
He soon may not be losing in court, or having his convictions overturned by the Supreme Court.

He seems to be about to be disbarred in the two states he is licensed to practice law for his illegal spy scheme on Republican Senators.


 
What a bunch of pathetic pearl clutching.
 
He soon may not be losing in court, or having his convictions overturned by the Supreme Court.

He seems to be about to be disbarred in the two states he is licensed to practice law for his illegal spy scheme on Republican Senators.


Illegal spying on political opponents. Just like Watergate.
 
He soon may not be losing in court, or having his convictions overturned by the Supreme Court.

He seems to be about to be disbarred in the two states he is licensed to practice law for his illegal spy scheme on Republican Senators.


Isn't Trump's FBI investigating Democrats? He says they are responsible for the violence. ANTIFA. So I'm sure Trump is tapping phones and spying on Democrats. He had a fixer when he wasn't president. Guys like Michael Cohen. You don't think Trump employs shady lawyers today who do his dirty work?
 
Liberals being tried by liberal judges with a liberal jury should not be constitutional.
 
Isn't Trump's FBI investigating Democrats? He says they are responsible for the violence. ANTIFA. So I'm sure Trump is tapping phones and spying on Democrats. He had a fixer when he wasn't president. Guys like Michael Cohen. You don't think Trump employs shady lawyers today who do his dirty work?
Bring your evidence, Simpybobo.
 
Isn't Trump's FBI investigating Democrats? He says they are responsible for the violence. ANTIFA. So I'm sure Trump is tapping phones and spying on Democrats. He had a fixer when he wasn't president. Guys like Michael Cohen. You don't think Trump employs shady lawyers today who do his dirty work?
Is your point that only Democrats should be allowed to weaponize the justice system?
 
Is your point that only Democrats should be allowed to weaponize the justice system?
Did they? We know the republicans have. I’ve never seen an attorney general and fbi director work so closely with the potus. I guess this is how it will be done moving forward.

Trump was colluding with Russia of course the president and fbi were spying on that crook. The president is above the law now remember the Supreme Court ruling? And overseas calls can be listened to
 
Did they? We know the republicans have. I’ve never seen an attorney general and fbi director work so closely with the potus. I guess this is how it will be done moving forward.
It is how it was always done, except under Biden and Trump 1.0. Or don't you remember Obama's Wingman? I honestly don't recall his name, but the Wingman title said it all.

I love that Democrat talking point that as long as POTUS was not involved, nothing the DOJ/FBI did can be called weaponization.
Yet another example of Democrats and "not Democrats" seeing where the ball is and setting their goalposts around it.

Of course Joe Biden himself was not directing the DOJ and FBI as they pursued Donald Trump for political purposes. Joe Biden could not have directed himself to the bathroom. He wasn't in charge of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, much less the DOJ and the FBI with their entrenched bureaucracy, and law-enforcement powers.

Doesn't mean that those institutions did not disgrace themselves by going after their own perceived political enemies and their enemies' allies, as the FBI already had a long, long history of doing (back to the earliest days of J. Edgar).

Good try with that, but it doesn't work with me.

The President is the chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government, and would be remiss in his duties if he never gave guidance to his subordinates.

Trump was colluding with Russia of course the president and fbi were spying on that crook.
Yet with all their spying and "evidence gathering," the Special Counsel had to release a report saying that there was not enough evidence to charge Trump with any conspiracy.
The president is above the law now remember the Supreme Court ruling? And overseas calls can be listened to
Yes, Democrats will get their own medicine for the next few years. "Gandar sauce" I call it, and it won't taste the same to them as when they were ladleing it out.
 
It is how it was always done, except under Biden and Trump 1.0. Or don't you remember Obama's Wingman? I honestly don't recall his name, but the Wingman title said it all.

I love that Democrat talking point that as long as POTUS was not involved, nothing the DOJ/FBI did can be called weaponization.
Yet another example of Democrats and "not Democrats" seeing where the ball is and setting their goalposts around it.

Of course Joe Biden himself was not directing the DOJ and FBI as they pursued Donald Trump for political purposes. Joe Biden could not have directed himself to the bathroom. He wasn't in charge of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, much less the DOJ and the FBI with their entrenched bureaucracy, and law-enforcement powers.

Doesn't mean that those institutions did not disgrace themselves by going after their own perceived political enemies and their enemies' allies, as the FBI already had a long, long history of doing (back to the earliest days of J. Edgar).

Good try with that, but it doesn't work with me.

The President is the chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government, and would be remiss in his duties if he never gave guidance to his subordinates.


Yet with all their spying and "evidence gathering," the Special Counsel had to release a report saying that there was not enough evidence to charge Trump with any conspiracy.

Yes, Democrats will get their own medicine for the next few years. "Gandar sauce" I call it, and it won't taste the same to them as when they were ladleing it out.
Forget talking facts and sense to him. Bobo has been drinking the Kool-aid too long.
 
15th post
It is how it was always done, except under Biden and Trump 1.0. Or don't you remember Obama's Wingman? I honestly don't recall his name, but the Wingman title said it all.

I love that Democrat talking point that as long as POTUS was not involved, nothing the DOJ/FBI did can be called weaponization.
Yet another example of Democrats and "not Democrats" seeing where the ball is and setting their goalposts around it.

Of course Joe Biden himself was not directing the DOJ and FBI as they pursued Donald Trump for political purposes. Joe Biden could not have directed himself to the bathroom. He wasn't in charge of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, much less the DOJ and the FBI with their entrenched bureaucracy, and law-enforcement powers.

Doesn't mean that those institutions did not disgrace themselves by going after their own perceived political enemies and their enemies' allies, as the FBI already had a long, long history of doing (back to the earliest days of J. Edgar).

Good try with that, but it doesn't work with me.

The President is the chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government, and would be remiss in his duties if he never gave guidance to his subordinates.


Yet with all their spying and "evidence gathering," the Special Counsel had to release a report saying that there was not enough evidence to charge Trump with any conspiracy.

Yes, Democrats will get their own medicine for the next few years. "Gandar sauce" I call it, and it won't taste the same to them as when they were ladleing it out.
There’s not enough evidence in any of the cases trump is bringing on his enemies. You’ll see. Zero convictions. Just retribution
 
There’s not enough evidence in any of the cases trump is bringing on his enemies. You’ll see. Zero convictions. Just retribution
If they are innocent, they have nothing to worry about. I've said that many times.
 
Back
Top Bottom