martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 85,183
- 35,692
- 2,300
The UDC (United Daughters of the Confederacy) propaganda propagation served exactly the same purpose as the UDTR (United Daughters of the Third Reich) did when they ran around Germany, Poland, Belgium, Norway and Russia putting up Hitler statues to the "noble" cause of Naziism and how the Jews were "happy with their lot".
--- Except of course that the UDTR never existed and wouldn't be tolerated.
If all you have is the Nazi angle, you got nothing.
What I have is a SIMPLE --- at least I thought it was simple --- example that even you could follow. If I refer to Nazi Germany, presumably I don't need to explain what that is. You should know.
Now imagine some history-revisionist group running around erecting statues in PUBLIC PLACES broadcasting all about the "noble cause" of the Third Reich and how it and its thugs were really a good thing that Jews and Poles and Czechs and Russians (etc etc etc) really didn't mind at all.
--- WHAT kind of reception would that action likely receive?
Suppose those monuments had been erected, hundreds of them all over Europe, and there was a contemporaty movement to take them down or at least move them out of public/municipal spaces... WHICH side would you be on?
Do the math.
The comparison is dead on it's start. Again, if you have to to Godwin to make your point, you lost.
A Civil War doesn't equate to a foreign war. Slavery doesn't equate to what the Nazis did. doing so is idiotic.
DING what are three assertions I never made for 600 Alex
How telling --- and how pathetic --- that you need to run away by mischaracterizing what I posted here.
As I called it already ---- FEAR. You can't deal with it. Wimp.
More typical pogo posting. No actual content when countered, just the mewling of a beta tard.
"No actual content" applies to the clueless post I quoted, wherein somebody --- oh look, that was you --- tried to set up strawmen of three assertions I never made. And I called your ass on it. Because it's the mark of the unprepared.
Should you come to the fray actually prepared, you'll get your money's worth. This shit ain't it.
Prepared for what? All you do is lock into one chickenshit point in someone's post and then refuse to let go of it like some retarded cocker-spaniel.
Hey, when you plop fallacy turds and call them chocolate, I'll immediately point out the ingredient label.
Don't like it? Then don't plop those fallacies in the first place. AGAIN --- misrepresenting the point is the mark of those who CAN'T HANDLE the point. And to cut to the chase, it is by definition dishonest.
Again, all you do is nit-pick, then go on a run on paragraph belch-fest.