Toro
Diamond Member
All economists know that when American jobs are outsourced, Americans as a group are net winners. What we lose through lower wages is more than offset by what we gain through lower prices. In other words, the winners can more than afford to compensate the losers. Does that mean they ought to? Does it create a moral mandate for the taxpayer-subsidized retraining programs proposed by Mr. McCain and Mr. Romney?
Um, no. Even if youve just lost your job, theres something fundamentally churlish about blaming the very phenomenon thats elevated you above the subsistence level since the day you were born. If the world owes you compensation for enduring the downside of trade, what do you owe the world for enjoying the upside?
I doubt theres a human being on earth who hasnt benefited from the opportunity to trade freely with his neighbors. Imagine what your life would be like if you had to grow your own food, make your own clothes and rely on your grandmothers home remedies for health care. Access to a trained physician might reduce the demand for grandmas home remedies, but especially at her age shes still got plenty of reason to be thankful for having a doctor.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/opinion/16landsburg.html?_r=2&ref=opinion&oref=slogin&oref=slogin