Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SCOTUS said they couldn’t treat churches differently than other institutions.And this after the ban was ruled unconstitutional by the supreme court
No, because Newsom issued waivers to many lib eventsSCOTUS said they couldn’t treat churches differently than other institutions.
The 50 person limit applied to all private events. Therefore it’s consistent with the ruling.
The first 5 minutes summed up the facts
Newsom is seeking fines against the church for holding services for more than 50 persons in 2020
And this after the ban was ruled unconstitutional by the supreme court
He banned public gatherings but drank a cup of STFU after Hispanics were out celebrating Cinco de Mayo. He was afraid to piss off his voting base. Going after churches was easier.No, because Newsom issued waivers to many lib events
And he allowed riots in the streets
SCOTUS said they couldn’t treat churches differently than other institutions.
The 50 person limit applied to all private events. Therefore it’s consistent with the ruling.
So it’s unconstitutional to issue waivers now?No, because Newsom issued waivers to many lib events
And he allowed riots in the streets
If that POS Mofo is president, Russia, China, N. Korea, and Iran are going to treat him like like how they treated the ***** ass wimp Obama.Newsome is a POS....End thread.
So covid was not dangerous at all, yes?So it’s unconstitutional to issue waivers now?
You can issue waivers, if a state restricts religious exercise while allowing or giving exemptions to comparable secular activities, then the rule triggers “strict scrutiny” under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, which religion falls under and is a right for all Americans.So it’s unconstitutional to issue waivers now?
Newsome is a POS....End thread.
No 1st amendment right is California. Democrats violated the Constitution now they are doubling down on violating the constitutionSCOTUS said they couldn’t treat churches differently than other institutions.
The 50 person limit applied to all private events. Therefore it’s consistent with the ruling.
No, because Newsom issued waivers to many lib events
And he allowed riots in the streets
The first 5 minutes summed up the facts
Newsom is seeking fines against the church for holding services for more than 50 persons in 2020
And this after the ban was ruled unconstitutional by the supreme court
The poster didn’t say anything about JesusGodless libs seek $1.2 million from california Christian church
Godless?
What makes you idiots think if you don't believe in Jesus, you don't believe in god?
Good those ******* grifters should have been taxed decades ago.