Global Warming deniers dwell in their obfuscation and whattaboutism. "What about a solution"?
The simple fact is they are obstructionists who deny there's a problem to begin with.
But they can't explain why there is no problem, they can't confront the chemical and physical properties of Carbon in the atmosphere, so they just deny there's a problem, and when the going gets tough they just blame the solution as being agenda-driven or wrong and never once address the fact, THERE IS A PROBLEM.
Dear
CryptoNinja Why not focus on reduction of emissions, pollution, waste and destruction?
The amount of work it takes to protect the environment from excess harm
is enough to motivate the necessary changes. This does not require winning any arguments about the warming effect or climate change.
This reminds me of Christians so "obsessed" with making sure people receive JESUS, the word, the symbol,
that they lose the meaning, where we can be focusing on JUSTICE that requires the
same forgiveness, healing, corrections, and restitution that it takes by calling Justice "Jesus."
We don't have to argue over the terms to get the process going and the corrections done!
Now this argument over "Global Warming" has produced the secular equivalent of "Jesus freaks."
Why not stick to principles and process required to correct, reduce, restore and prevent?
CryptoNinja can you explain to me why this has to be explained using "global warming"
and it isn't enough to point out pollution, destruction, health problems, economic instability?
isn't the real issue SUSTAINABILITY?
Why can't we just focus on what is going to make more sense in the longrun?
Does it matter if YOUR reasoning is GW and someone else's issue is clean air and water, saving rivers, oceans, forests and ecosystems?
Doesn't saving the planet from destruction require
the same clean energy and restoration/preservation work???
Why argue in circles when we could be AGREEING on actual steps to get DONE???