Why is there even an argument? Of course these prisoners have a right to starve themselves to death. Anyone who believes in an ounce of freedom would give them that.
This is the most ironically hilarious post of all time.
Hey, let's imprison these guys without habeas corpus, waterboard the living **** out of them, deny them a real trial, completely destroy their lives, keep them in prison indefinitely without ever having to prove they belong there, but for God's sake let's not force them to eat. We believe in freedom!
Liberals especially hold that every individual has the freedom to make life and death decisions for themselves. In some states it is the law. Are they competent to decide whether or not to end thier lives? That's the only question. If they are, the ordinary laws regarding assisted suicide should apply.
Force feeding on the other hand is a form of torture and has been held to be a form of torture by the united nations and recognized in muslim countries as a form of torture.
US: UN calls Guantanamo force-feeding "torture" | The Muslim NewsThe Muslim News
You might, in total ignorance, think that force feeding is putting them in front of a plate and telling them they can't get up until all the veggies are gone. Force feeding means a tube is inserted in the nose, forced through the sinus cavity, past the gag reflex and down into the stomach and then food is pressured through the tube. In order to perform this very painful procedure, the person's body is immobilized, the head is immobilized by leather straps. Sadly, when the tube goes through the gag reflex the person is lying down making retching an agony.
These men have the absolute right, as human beings, to decide to end their lives and should be afforded the dignity of choosing their own method of doing so.