Gingrich, the loser, dares to attack Obama's legacy!

[NLT]

Why the media even gives a POS like Gingrich a platform at all is beyond me. His jealousy at Obama 's presidency rings loudly in every disparaging word he utters in his rant. Gingrich's jealousy can be traced to his own failures and publicized immoral conduct. That parting valediction can be placed beside the obvious undercurrent of racial hegemony that marks most RW commentary concerning Obama.



WHICH brings me to the question of Newt's legacy! In my book Obama;s legacy is the preferred one in comparison to Gingrich's.



Gingrich: Obama 'desperate frenzy' to save legacy - CNNPolitics.com

 

[JQPublic1]

The same people who give obama a 54% popularity rating gave hillary a 98.8% chance of winning the election.

That is a fair assumption but how do you reconcile that with Obama's two terms as president?
I think Obama;s approval rating is linked more closely to his likability and has nothing to do with Hillary.

 

[JQPublic1]

Poor little Alt Right wussies butt hurt that a black president is popular.

So popular that everything he did is about to be changed back...he is that popular......

Are you holding your breath in anticipation of "everything" being changed back to the "bad" ol' daze?

 

[JQPublic1]

newt is swimming in a cesspool and drawing the pos who left his wife with cance

John Edwards ?

Another douche How many times was that pos newt married??? as many as the other pos dump??

Yep...but most are douches.

Obama's legacy is already sealed....he's a failure.

Failures don't get to serve two terms as president nor do the y leave office with high approval ratings. Obama was extremely successful despite RW efforts to block anything he tried.

Yeah, he is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies.

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

 

[JQPublic1]

If Gingrich is a loser, who cares what he says?

It seems that you are more concerned about what he is saying than any our are. Could it be you think he is right and are trying to undercut him to deny what you think?

Nope, you are wrong on all counts.

Then why do you care so much what he says if he is such a loser? I don't think he is a loser and I don't care what he says. I'd care less if I thought him a loser

The infectious lies spread by losers like Gingrich appeal to millions of other losers. Therein lies the danger. We don't want him inciting RW nut cases with malicious falsehoods.

 

[JQPublic1]

Failures don't get to serve two terms as president nor do the y leave office with high approval ratings. Obama was extremely successful despite RW efforts to block anything he tried.

You're somehow forgetting that those "high approval ratings" are coming from the same sources that were giving Hillary 90+% chance of winning the election. And you still use them as reference?

Can you prove that? For your info most of the average joes in western countries also give Obama a high approval rating.

Western countries? Who gives a shit about their approval?

Some of us brainy types do! It aids in strategizing diplomacy and, thusly, was recorded by the Gallup Poll/ They thought it was THAT important!

Which Gallup Poll are you referring to?

Google Obama;s international favorability ratings.

 

[Avatar4321]

If Gingrich is a loser, who cares what he says?

It seems that you are more concerned about what he is saying than any our are. Could it be you think he is right and are trying to undercut him to deny what you think?

Nope, you are wrong on all counts.

Then why do you care so much what he says if he is such a loser? I don't think he is a loser and I don't care what he says. I'd care less if I thought him a loser

The infectious lies spread by losers like Gingrich appeal to millions of other losers. Therein lies the danger. We don't want him inciting RW nut cases with malicious falsehoods.

Problem is you aren't attacking any lies. You are attacking him. Calling him a loser doesn't change or challenge the veracity of what he says.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

John Edwards ?

Another douche How many times was that pos newt married??? as many as the other pos dump??

Yep...but most are douches.

Obama's legacy is already sealed....he's a failure.

Failures don't get to serve two terms as president nor do the y leave office with high approval ratings. Obama was extremely successful despite RW efforts to block anything he tried.

Yeah, he is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies.

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

The majority of those who voted also rejected HIllary.

 

[JQPublic1]

Another douche How many times was that pos newt married??? as many as the other pos dump??

Yep...but most are douches.

Obama's legacy is already sealed....he's a failure.

Failures don't get to serve two terms as president nor do the y leave office with high approval ratings. Obama was extremely successful despite RW efforts to block anything he tried.

Yeah, he is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies.

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

The majority of those who voted also rejected HIllary.

But Hillary got more votes than any other candidate, including Trump!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Yep...but most are douches.

Obama's legacy is already sealed....he's a failure.

Failures don't get to serve two terms as president nor do the y leave office with high approval ratings. Obama was extremely successful despite RW efforts to block anything he tried.

Yeah, he is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies.

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

The majority of those who voted also rejected HIllary.

But Hillary got more votes than any other candidate, including Trump!

Still didn't get over 50% which means over 50% of the voters chose someone else.

 

[JQPublic1]

If Gingrich is a loser, who cares what he says?

It seems that you are more concerned about what he is saying than any our are. Could it be you think he is right and are trying to undercut him to deny what you think?

Nope, you are wrong on all counts.

Then why do you care so much what he says if he is such a loser? I don't think he is a loser and I don't care what he says. I'd care less if I thought him a loser

The infectious lies spread by losers like Gingrich appeal to millions of other losers. Therein lies the danger. We don't want him inciting RW nut cases with malicious falsehoods.

Problem is you aren't attacking any lies. You are attacking him. Calling him a loser doesn't change or challenge the veracity of what he says.

The title of this thread says it all. Gingrich's comments are tainted by his shady past. That he would seek to restore some of his lost dignity by attempting to vilify Obama's legacy is the thrust of my argument. What brought him out off the shadows to give his off -the-cuff opinion?
Newt has no inkling of what Obama is thinking in regards to his legacy but he just had to give a parting hateful shot at Obama for the sake of possibly getting on board the populist gravy train.

 

[eddiew37]

If Gingrich is a loser, who cares what he says?

It seems that you are more concerned about what he is saying than any our are. Could it be you think he is right and are trying to undercut him to deny what you think?

Nope, you are wrong on all counts.

Then why do you care so much what he says if he is such a loser? I don't think he is a loser and I don't care what he says. I'd care less if I thought him a loser

The infectious lies spread by losers like Gingrich appeal to millions of other losers. Therein lies the danger. We don't want him inciting RW nut cases with malicious falsehoods.

Problem is you aren't attacking any lies. You are attacking him. Calling him a loser doesn't change or challenge the veracity of what he says.

Of what he says???? what he says yesterday is completely different from what he says today A degenerate liar as well as a human being

 

[JQPublic1]

Failures don't get to serve two terms as president nor do the y leave office with high approval ratings. Obama was extremely successful despite RW efforts to block anything he tried.

Yeah, he is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies.

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

The majority of those who voted also rejected HIllary.

But Hillary got more votes than any other candidate, including Trump!

Still didn't get over 50% which means over 50% of the voters chose someone else.

Don't lose sight of how this exchange started. It began with this:

Yeah, he ( Obama) is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies

You made it seem Trump had a mandate with "the American People" when he did not. That is the crux of my premise and I accentuated it by pointing out that Hilary had more of the popular vote than he did. ..know what that means? It means you lied when you said the American people wanted Donald Trump. It is a fact that a majority of Americans did NOT want Donald Trump.

More wanted Hillary than wanted Donald Trump. Understand?

 

[rdean]

Gingrich went to the hospital where his wife was for cancer and at her bed, served her divorce papers so he could marry the young woman who had been giving him blow jobs.

And this is why he is so popular among Republicans. He showed Bill Clinton how it's done.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Yeah, he is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies.

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

The majority of those who voted also rejected HIllary.

But Hillary got more votes than any other candidate, including Trump!

Still didn't get over 50% which means over 50% of the voters chose someone else.

Don't lose sight of how this exchange started. It began with this:

Yeah, he ( Obama) is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies

You made it seem Trump had a mandate with "the American People" when he did not. That is the crux of my premise and I accentuated it by pointing out that Hilary had more of the popular vote than he did. ..know what that means? It means you lied when you said the American people wanted Donald Trump. It is a fact that a majority of Americans did NOT want Donald Trump.

More wanted Hillary than wanted Donald Trump. Understand?

Actually, it was your comment:

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

And I simply stated that she was also rejected by a majority of Americans. Something you can't seem to accept.

Let's not even start on what a loser Trump is. He should have been creamed. But he wasn't.

I don't ever recall saying it was a mandate.

What I said was that it was a rejection.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yeah, he is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies.

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

The majority of those who voted also rejected HIllary.

But Hillary got more votes than any other candidate, including Trump!

Still didn't get over 50% which means over 50% of the voters chose someone else.

Don't lose sight of how this exchange started. It began with this:

Yeah, he ( Obama) is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies

You made it seem Trump had a mandate with "the American People" when he did not. That is the crux of my premise and I accentuated it by pointing out that Hilary had more of the popular vote than he did. ..know what that means? It means you lied when you said the American people wanted Donald Trump. It is a fact that a majority of Americans did NOT want Donald Trump.

More wanted Hillary than wanted Donald Trump. Understand?

More wanted Hillary than wanted Donald Trump.

How many electoral college voters wanted Hillary?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The same people who give obama a 54% popularity rating gave hillary a 98.8% chance of winning the election.

That is a fair assumption but how do you reconcile that with Obama's two terms as president?
I think Obama;s approval rating is linked more closely to his likability and has nothing to do with Hillary.

He won two terms because he is black. Hilly ran on obama's policies. It didn't work out did it.

 

[JQPublic1]

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

The majority of those who voted also rejected HIllary.

But Hillary got more votes than any other candidate, including Trump!

Still didn't get over 50% which means over 50% of the voters chose someone else.

Don't lose sight of how this exchange started. It began with this:

Yeah, he ( Obama) is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies

You made it seem Trump had a mandate with "the American People" when he did not. That is the crux of my premise and I accentuated it by pointing out that Hilary had more of the popular vote than he did. ..know what that means? It means you lied when you said the American people wanted Donald Trump. It is a fact that a majority of Americans did NOT want Donald Trump.

More wanted Hillary than wanted Donald Trump. Understand?

More wanted Hillary than wanted Donald Trump.

How many electoral college voters wanted Hillary?

We will never know since the Electoral College voter usually validates the majority popular vote in his/her state. That doesn't mean their vote indicates their personal "WANTS."
And since the GOP purged thousands of democrats off the voting rolls, they stole the general election and activated republican electors in former blue states while nullifying an equal number of democrat electors. So your question is silly.

 

[JQPublic1]

The same people who give obama a 54% popularity rating gave hillary a 98.8% chance of winning the election.

That is a fair assumption but how do you reconcile that with Obama's two terms as president?
I think Obama;s approval rating is linked more closely to his likability and has nothing to do with Hillary.

He won two terms because he is black. Hilly ran on obama's policies. It didn't work out did it.

Did you vote for him because he was Black? who told you that?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Yep...but most are douches.

Obama's legacy is already sealed....he's a failure.

Failures don't get to serve two terms as president nor do the y leave office with high approval ratings. Obama was extremely successful despite RW efforts to block anything he tried.

Yeah, he is so successful that the American people wanted Donald trump rather than to continue his supposedly great policies.

Which American people are you referring too? The majority of American voters rejected Donald trump. His ass was saved by the Electoral College.

The majority of those who voted also rejected HIllary.

But Hillary got more votes than any other candidate, including Trump!

Because of California.

California has 55 electoral votes and has never decided an election.