The region has been documented as being called Palestine, and the people Palestinians, centuries before Roman occupation of the area.
PROVE IT.
Go read the Torah. It dates back to centuries before Roman Occupation of the area. Or, you can read
Herodotus, circa 450 B.C.E. But I've already provided this link. Just goes to that you're not even paying attention, you're just repeating your unfounded claims.
Translation into modern terms and in modern English language we call the area Palestine.
That's where you're wrong. The Hebrew term is "Peleshet." And since I'm sure you'll make a similar argument about the translated text of Herodotus I'll point out now that the Greek term is "Palaistine."
The Romans named the place, and that is a simple fact.
No, it's simply an unfounded claim. I challenge you to provide evidence that the name is of Roman origin. Of course, you won't be able to. "Palestine" is not a Latin term, does not originate from Latin in any way. The Romans merely used the name the region already had to name its province in that area.
Where do you think the name comes from? When do you think it got that name?
The earliest documented forms of the name are Egyptian. The earliest origins are unknown. In any event, even if we accepted your false theory that the Romans named the region, that would still mean that the region has been named Palestine for thousands of years, and would destroy the argument that the Palestinians are an "invented" people.
So far all you;re doing is blowing smoke.
Actually I've been presenting factual information and providing sources. You're the one blowing smoke. The very idea that the Romans came up with the name is ludicrous. May as well be saying that the Germans came up with the name Canada.[/QUOTE]
'Palestine' was the name the Romans gave what was known prior to that as 'Judea', the Wikipedia link and quote I provided document that. Your response of 'go read the Torah' or 'go read Herodotus' is not a citation nor a rational response of any real value. Jesus, you apparently dont even know what documentation is or you're just too lazy to engage in honest discussion.
You have made one unwarranted assertion after another, so by this time it is apparent that you have no references to back up your ridiculous claims.
Newt was right, though I question the wisdom of saying it the way he did since there is/should be no doubt in anyones mind that TODAY the Palestinians are a legitimate people given the recent post 1948 events that distinguish them from the other Arab communities in the region.