Gingrich - Obama the most dangerous President in US history.

Problem is, wingnuts have been led to believe that the Giffords tragedy has nothing at all to do with their whacko gun rhetoric.. She was just a victim of fate. She just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Beyond the shooting, gun nuts really don't want to have anything to do with what prompted the guy to shoot and kill all of those people.

You do realize that gabbys shooter was a left leaning loon dont you? His own friends admitted as much, the literature that he read was left leaning, his rants on Facebook was left leaning. That does not fit your narrative though so I can see why you would not want to notice.

You do realize that idiots like you by glorifying violence, and diefying a tool, guns, put the gun in that loons hands, don't you?

Anytime there is a bill to prevent the loons from getting their hands on guns, the NRA and rightwingnuts do their best to prevent that from happening. So we have a murder rate in this nation that is appalling. And war weopons on our streets.

2nd amendment is a right, and with each right comes responsibility. EVeryone has a right to keep and bear arms, and you also have the responsibility to not murder people with that gun. The idiot who commits the murder is to be held accountable, not the rest of the law abiding citizens who committed no crime. I understand those of you on the left have no clue what responsibility means, and we will never allow such an atrocity like the giffords shooting to be an excuse for you crazy bastards to restrict the law abiding ownership of guns. Get over it.
 
Old Rocks [QUOTE said:
Anytime there is a bill to prevent the loons from getting their hands on guns, the NRA and rightwingnuts do their best to prevent that from happening. So we have a murder rate in this nation that is appalling. And war weopons on our streets.
[/QUOTE]

Anytime a bill is introduced to put loons in a safe environment with the right meds, is shot down by the left who cry their constitutional rights have been violated.
No, the left always want to take the gun away that the loony tune used, from all who do use it responsibly.
With the left, it is the right of the insane person, but never for the law abiding citizen.
 
Newt? A lion? :lol:

He was laughed out of congress several decades ago. He's a erratic one-eyed bloated alley cat with a twisted tail.

And I am being kind.

Recent polling shows that not only does Newt not stand a chance..but the Congress would go Dem if he ran.

Several decades ago? You do realize that is 70 years ago right? And the man is 69 years old right now.

No.

Several is 2 or more..

sev·er·al/ˈsev(ə)rəl/
Adjective:
1.More than two but not many: "the author of several books"; "Van Gogh was just one of several artists who gathered at Auvers".
2.Separate or respective: "their several responsibilities".

One of those "confusing" words in the English language.

Several could also mean up to 7, clarity is nice from time to time on what you mean.
 
DId we hear the left accept blame when Reagan was shot? Of course not.,

The truth about obama needs to be told, He IS the most dangerous president in history.

Feel free to point out where an elected Democrat or Democrat running for President was calling Reagan a dangerous foreigner with a sensibility outside of a normal American mindset.

Hinckley by any account was an outlier. He based his actions on a film and a percieved romance with an actress.
 
Last edited:
You do realize that gabbys shooter was a left leaning loon dont you? His own friends admitted as much, the literature that he read was left leaning, his rants on Facebook was left leaning. That does not fit your narrative though so I can see why you would not want to notice.

You do realize that idiots like you by glorifying violence, and diefying a tool, guns, put the gun in that loons hands, don't you?

Anytime there is a bill to prevent the loons from getting their hands on guns, the NRA and rightwingnuts do their best to prevent that from happening. So we have a murder rate in this nation that is appalling. And war weopons on our streets.

2nd amendment is a right, and with each right comes responsibility. EVeryone has a right to keep and bear arms, and you also have the responsibility to not murder people with that gun. The idiot who commits the murder is to be held accountable, not the rest of the law abiding citizens who committed no crime. I understand those of you on the left have no clue what responsibility means, and we will never allow such an atrocity like the giffords shooting to be an excuse for you crazy bastards to restrict the law abiding ownership of guns. Get over it.

Where does the constitution say anything about guns? It says arms..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSjeTFx5JI4]Don't Be A Menace - "Do We Have A Problem?" - YouTube[/ame]

I want my nuke.

It's the only way to be sure.
 
Several decades ago? You do realize that is 70 years ago right? And the man is 69 years old right now.

No.

Several is 2 or more..

sev·er·al/ˈsev(ə)rəl/
Adjective:
1.More than two but not many: "the author of several books"; "Van Gogh was just one of several artists who gathered at Auvers".
2.Separate or respective: "their several responsibilities".

One of those "confusing" words in the English language.

Several could also mean up to 7, clarity is nice from time to time on what you mean.

Erm..2 or more.

So in this case..the word is fine.
 
The simple truth really pisses you libtards off, doesn't it?

What a fucking asshole. Did Giffords teach this man nothing? It's this sort of rhetoric that inspires lunatics to do awful things. Gingrich is one of the most irresponsible polticians in history. This alone, should disqualify him to be President. Aside from his racism and bigotry..he has no problem engaging in some real damaging and breathtakingly stupid behavior.

From closing down government over a perceived slight to making films and putting out literature and media that "intellectualize" his bigotry and racism..this man should have been purged from politics long ago.

And it's a shame he wasn't.
 
DId we hear the left accept blame when Reagan was shot? Of course not.,

The truth about obama needs to be told, He IS the most dangerous president in history.

Feel free to point out where an elected Democrat or Democrat running for President was calling Reagan a dangerous foreigner with a sensibility outside of a normal American mindset.

Hinckley by any account was an outlier. He based his actions on a film and a percieved romance with an actress.

Reagan was not actively passing legislation destroying the constitution and civil rights. Theres a big difference between Reagan and Obama. What Reagan was doing was adding 20,000,000 to the economy, the Democrats could not in there right minds could not call him dangerous without suffering a huge backlash from people living in reality.
There you go again, instead of holding Hinckley accountable for what he did, you allow him to skate on the excuse that he watched a movie, another classic example of someone on the left not knowing anything about holding someone responsible and accountable for there actions. It wasn't a movie that made him do it, and it wasn't the gun that did it. He made the choice himself to try to kill Reagan, and the gun could not have fired had he not pulled the trigger. Maybe you can understand it better if you see it for yourself in cartoon mode.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCnbs67syao]American Dad - Guns don't kill people - YouTube[/ame]
 
How long you all going to throw out Giffords as a reason to try and make people shut up?

Good question Steph.

Giffords was shot by a nut job. A nutjob who can't even be tried for his crime because he a, well, nutjob.
A WingNutJob. Heavily influenced by Wingnut Media.


Sarahpac1.jpg
 
Anytime a bill is introduced to put loons in a safe environment with the right meds, is shot down by the left who cry their constitutional rights have been violated.
No, the left always want to take the gun away that the loony tune used, from all who do use it responsibly.
With the left, it is the right of the insane person, but never for the law abiding citizen.

Really?

It was Reagan that let the loons out of the looney bin, chief, when he cut funding for Mental health.
 
You do realize that idiots like you by glorifying violence, and diefying a tool, guns, put the gun in that loons hands, don't you?

Anytime there is a bill to prevent the loons from getting their hands on guns, the NRA and rightwingnuts do their best to prevent that from happening. So we have a murder rate in this nation that is appalling. And war weopons on our streets.

2nd amendment is a right, and with each right comes responsibility. EVeryone has a right to keep and bear arms, and you also have the responsibility to not murder people with that gun. The idiot who commits the murder is to be held accountable, not the rest of the law abiding citizens who committed no crime. I understand those of you on the left have no clue what responsibility means, and we will never allow such an atrocity like the giffords shooting to be an excuse for you crazy bastards to restrict the law abiding ownership of guns. Get over it.

Where does the constitution say anything about guns? It says arms..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSjeTFx5JI4]Don't Be A Menace - "Do We Have A Problem?" - YouTube[/ame]

I want my nuke.

It's the only way to be sure.

How this ties in is beyond me.
 
The simple truth really pisses you libtards off, doesn't it?

What a fucking asshole. Did Giffords teach this man nothing? It's this sort of rhetoric that inspires lunatics to do awful things. Gingrich is one of the most irresponsible polticians in history. This alone, should disqualify him to be President. Aside from his racism and bigotry..he has no problem engaging in some real damaging and breathtakingly stupid behavior.

From closing down government over a perceived slight to making films and putting out literature and media that "intellectualize" his bigotry and racism..this man should have been purged from politics long ago.

And it's a shame he wasn't.

The truth holds them accountable, and they hate accountability.
 
How long you all going to throw out Giffords as a reason to try and make people shut up?

Good question Steph.

Giffords was shot by a nut job. A nutjob who can't even be tried for his crime because he a, well, nutjob.
A WingNutJob. Heavily influenced by Wingnut Media.


Sarahpac1.jpg

Wow, a picture caused all of this? Who would have thought. So instead of holding the man accountable for being a nutjob you would rather shift blame and not at all blame him for being a crazy fucker with mental issues? Typical left wing loon.
 
How long you all going to throw out Giffords as a reason to try and make people shut up?

Good question Steph.

Giffords was shot by a nut job. A nutjob who can't even be tried for his crime because he a, well, nutjob.
A WingNutJob. Heavily influenced by Wingnut Media.


Sarahpac1.jpg

It would have been more political, less individually threatening if they had just named districts. But no, they had to name and target PEOPLE.
 
Anytime a bill is introduced to put loons in a safe environment with the right meds, is shot down by the left who cry their constitutional rights have been violated.
No, the left always want to take the gun away that the loony tune used, from all who do use it responsibly.
With the left, it is the right of the insane person, but never for the law abiding citizen.

Really?

It was Reagan that let the loons out of the looney bin, chief, when he cut funding for Mental health.

If nothing is stated in the constitution that the federal government should be paying for mental health then it should not be funded by the federal government to begin with. And the last time I checked it is not in there. It would then be a states issue.
That darned'ol constitution just keeps getting in the way doesn't it?
 
DId we hear the left accept blame when Reagan was shot? Of course not.,

The truth about obama needs to be told, He IS the most dangerous president in history.

Feel free to point out where an elected Democrat or Democrat running for President was calling Reagan a dangerous foreigner with a sensibility outside of a normal American mindset.

Hinckley by any account was an outlier. He based his actions on a film and a percieved romance with an actress.

Reagan was not actively passing legislation destroying the constitution and civil rights. Theres a big difference between Reagan and Obama. What Reagan was doing was adding 20,000,000 to the economy, the Democrats could not in there right minds could not call him dangerous without suffering a huge backlash from people living in reality.
There you go again, instead of holding Hinckley accountable for what he did, you allow him to skate on the excuse that he watched a movie, another classic example of someone on the left not knowing anything about holding someone responsible and accountable for there actions. It wasn't a movie that made him do it, and it wasn't the gun that did it. He made the choice himself to try to kill Reagan, and the gun could not have fired had he not pulled the trigger. Maybe you can understand it better if you see it for yourself in cartoon mode.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCnbs67syao]American Dad - Guns don't kill people - YouTube[/ame]

WTF are you talking about? 20,000,000 what? Reagan's first term was puncuated by dismal economic performance and massive military spending. He freaking grew the deficit way above what any other President before him had done. He also colluded with enemies of America. And funded terrorists. Terrorists that went on to rape and kill American nuns..and blow the shit out of the WTC. Add in there were SEVERAL financial calmities during his 2 terms that REQUIRED tax payer bailouts.

My question was "Which Democrat was saying anything close about Reagan..that compares to what Newt is saying about Obama?"

Simple enough.
 

Forum List

Back
Top