Getting the DOJ under control

[1srelluc]

The idiocy of this statement is beyond the pale.

Just calling balls and strikes.....Sorry it does not fit your agenda.

 

[kyzr]

And who decides who these people are? The politicians. Who decides who the politicians are?
Should be the people. But is it?

1. The presidents name their AGs subject to senate approval as to being qualified
2. You're getting into a murky area asking if the people elect the president or if the hi-tech oligarchs, the MSM, and the deep state sway voters to elect the president THEY want.

 

[frigidweirdo]

1. The presidents name their AGs subject to senate approval as to being qualified
2. You're getting into a murky area asking if the people elect the president or if the hi-tech oligarchs, the MSM, and the deep state sway voters to elect the president THEY want.

Well, there are lots of issues with this "murky area"
The first is that the system chooses. Not people. They system. The FPTP system is notorious for benefiting the top two parties. In Germany in 2017 the CDU/CSU gained 37.27% of the FPTP votes and got 77% of the seats 231 seats out of 299.
Did the people decide this? No, the system decided this. What the people had decided was that FPTP wouldn't be the deciding factor in how many seats a party got. So PR kicked in and instead they got 246 out of 709 seats. 34.6% of the seats.
They literally got less percentage of the seats, than they got FPTP votes. Why? Because with PR the two largest parties usually lose votes compared to FPTP. People feel more free to vote for who they want. And they do.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The only way to get them under control is a clean sweep of every Obama appointee and everyone promoted to a senior position under Obama.

That will decimate them, but the are all but useless as a crime-fighting organization, so we will not miss them while they are rebuild. They must be decentralized as to function and region, and never be allowed to conduct political investigations.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Unreliable source, rightwing fake news site.

“Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.”

American Thinker - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

This isn't 2007 Saul.

No one is impressed by leftist fact changing sites.


MEDIA BIAS CHECK

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

 

[Independent thinker]

Controlling the Department of Justice

The unabashed political persecution and unconscionable years of pre-trial incarceration for some January 6th protestors in direct violation of the Sixth Amendment. The near-psychotic obsession to indict and convict Donald Trump of any specious f...

www.americanthinker.com

most likely won't happen. It should but most likely not.

Fact is, we need to find a way to de-weaponize and unswamp the deep states of agencies such as this. BUT, that means from BOTH sides, not just one. They need to be truly independent, fair, and unbiased.