George W. Bush Bashes Obama on Middle East

[occupied]

There's no such thing as a Far-Left... One either rejects the Principles that sustain freedom, or one does not.

This sounds like one of those war-is-peace gems of wisdom.

Either/or statements are a sure sign of a political dumb-ass.

See how the irony impaired far left drones are at it again.

See how the political dumb-ass makes another meaningless post.

See how the far left drones show how they are irony impaired..

See how the political dumb-ass makes yet another meaningless post.

 

[Kosh]

This sounds like one of those war-is-peace gems of wisdom.

Either/or statements are a sure sign of a political dumb-ass.

See how the irony impaired far left drones are at it again.

See how the political dumb-ass makes another meaningless post.

See how the far left drones show how they are irony impaired..

See how the political dumb-ass makes yet another meaningless post.

Even more irony impairment from the far left drones on this board.

 

[rdean]

What's good for Jimmy Carter is good enough for the last president we had.

There were no wars America was involved in under Carter.

That's why Republicans call him weak.

 

[idb]

It's simply astonishing how anyone can see Bush's "War On Terror" as anything but an unmitigated and tragic disaster.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You're not a leftie honey.

See how the far left drones will deny their own words.

They hail FDR a hero for invading a country that did not attack the US.

Iraq dude. We're talking about Iraq. And the mess you armchair commandos made of it.

So 1991 made a mess of Iraq?

1991 was an effective and well planned strategy to to halt Iraq's invasion and annexation of Kuwait. Mission cleanly accomplished in one year. Iraq left intact but declawed.

Yet, there was Al Gore criticizing Bush for allowing saddam keep his WMDs in this speech.

******* hilarious.



I dare you to watch that whole speech, you ignorant hypocrite.

Who was it again that propagated saddam had wmds?

LOL at you and your pathetic double talking party that plays like you like a 3 dollar banjo and relies on your total inability to think for yourself.

So you're saying that Bush thinks the same as Al Gore. Okay.

 

[NYcarbineer]

None of the above are relevant.

Bush invaded Iraq on the thinnest of excuses thinking all he had to do was remove Sadaam. The single most stupid decision a president has ever made and the level ignorance and arrogance was appalling. It set off ongoing sectarian conflict that destabilized neighboring countries into civil war when they decided to topple their dictators. It gave Iran unfettered freedom to dabble in regional conflicts.

That's a major event, that has led to one of the biggest humanitarian crisis since WW2.

Yes FDR who lied the US in to war..

Yes FDR who attack a country that did not attack the US.

Yes FDR who used the war to further the power of government as he was the one constructed the military industrial complex..

How cute. Now you want to compare Iraq with WW2

The far left drone already did that!

You're not a leftie honey.

See how the far left drones will deny their own words.

They hail FDR a hero for invading a country that did not attack the US.

And which country was that?

 

[healthmyths]

It's simply astonishing how anyone can see Bush's "War On Terror" as anything but an unmitigated and tragic disaster.

What would have been the results if during WWII US congressmen declared as these traitors and probably you agree with them
that our military are killers,terrorists,killing civilians... Who do you think that helped the most in making Iraq Liberation take 5 more
years and 3,000 more deaths?

A Harvard Study asked: THE EMBOLDENMENT EFFECT
"Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war.
In Iraqi provinces that were broadly comparable in social and economic terms, attacks increased between 7 percent and 10 percent following what the researchers call "high-mention weeks," like the two just before the November 2006 election.

And these statements which idiots like YOU most likely agreed with did everything in the world to encourage recruit and reward the terrorists to continue.
Remember Kerry EARLIER wanted Bush to: "Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real .... "Kerry , Jan . 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
NOTE: Do you not believe the terrorists LOVED to hear our troops were cold blooded killers???

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

So you explain to me why these above recorded liberal/progressives should NOT be called terrorists because THESE WORDS were used and encouragement given to the barbarians to murder 100,000 Iraqis including 4,000 US troops... all because these idiots wanted political power regardless of how much blood it costs our US soldiers!

According to the NYT in 1995 before Clinton signed The 1998 Liberation of Iraq authorized by Congress' Resolution of 2002 (Public law 107-243, 116 Stat. 1497-1502) "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq " "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling .
"It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime."

On December 16, 1998, President Bill Clinton mandated Operation Desert Fox, a major four-day bombing campaign on Iraqi targets.

In spite of that Saddam allowed In five years 576,000 children to starve BECAUSE SADDAM refused to certify WMD destruction!
Iraq Sanctions Kill Children U.N. Reports - NYTimes.com

 

[Coyote]

Iraq dude. We're talking about Iraq. And the mess you armchair commandos made of it.

So 1991 made a mess of Iraq?

1991 was an effective and well planned strategy to to halt Iraq's invasion and annexation of Kuwait. Mission cleanly accomplished in one year. Iraq left intact but declawed.

See how the far left will hop on this ban wagon when they were against it in 1991.

I wasn't against it in 1991. Try to stick to reality here dude.

Of course you were against it, before you were for it..

Even those far left drones that voted against the war in 1991 have since done a 180..

You're not making any sense - is your messaging corrupted?

 

[Coyote]

You're not a leftie honey.

See how the far left drones will deny their own words.

They hail FDR a hero for invading a country that did not attack the US.

Iraq dude. We're talking about Iraq. And the mess you armchair commandos made of it.

So 1991 made a mess of Iraq?

1991 was an effective and well planned strategy to to halt Iraq's invasion and annexation of Kuwait. Mission cleanly accomplished in one year. Iraq left intact but declawed.

Yet, there was Al Gore criticizing Bush for allowing saddam keep his WMDs in this speech.

******* hilarious.



I dare you to watch that whole speech, you ignorant hypocrite.

Who was it again that propagated saddam had wmds?

LOL at you and your pathetic double talking party that plays like you like a 3 dollar banjo and relies on your total inability to think for yourself.

And?

 

[Camp]

[

See how the far left drones will deny their own words.

They hail FDR a hero for invading a country that did not attack the US.

Explain this bit of stupidity. Are you really this brainwashed into believing nonsense? Which country did FDR invade that did not attack us?

 

[danielpalos]

It's simply astonishing how anyone can see Bush's "War On Terror" as anything but an unmitigated and tragic disaster.

Where did the right find any "War on Terror" in their republican Doctrine?

 

[rdean]

It's simply astonishing how anyone can see Bush's "War On Terror" as anything but an unmitigated and tragic disaster.

I know, right? When right wingers refuse to acknowledge something, their faces can be ground into it and they still won't see. They are the ultimate deniers.