Gender, the next big fight

[Meathead]

Is the left disappointed that all women don't look like Rachel Maddow?

Nope. And hey, she might be AIS as well. Quite a few well-known women, including Ann Coulter more than likely.

Have you seen Kagan, Reno or Hillary? Yuck!

 

[alan1]

I read what the right has to say on this issue daily. Once gay marriage is a done deal, this is the next big thing.

You read what the left claims the right has to say on issues.
It's your claim.
Most of us on the right don't give a damn.
Most of the left want's it to be an issue.
More projection.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Is the left disappointed that all women don't look like Rachel Maddow?

Nope. And hey, she might be AIS as well. Quite a few well-known women, including Ann Coulter more than likely.

Have you seen Kagan, Reno or Hillary? Yuck!

Tell me if they had kids and we'll make bets on their AIS status? Coulter, never married no kids. Thinks like a man, acts like a man. A very good bet.

 

[alan1]

Who cares?

The left cares.
They want to make a non-issue a big-issue.

Oh, this is way more than a non-issue. This is core to human sexual and gender identity. It's big, and about to get much bigger because of people like this young woman, who genetically is a male.

It's not a big issue.
It's a personal choice.
Why is the left trying to make it a big issue?

 

[Meathead]

Oh, this is way more than a non-issue. This is core to human sexual and gender identity. It's big, and about to get much bigger because of people like this young woman, who genetically is a male.

Who cares, except you? I have to considerate personal. Your problem, not anyone else's.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I read what the right has to say on this issue daily. Once gay marriage is a done deal, this is the next big thing.

You read what the left claims the right has to say on issues.
It's your claim.
Most of us on the right don't give a damn.
Most of the left want's it to be an issue.
More projection.

For you, and that's just the top Google pick: Gender Confusion and the Complicity of Public Schools - Lee Culpepper - Page full

 

[Meathead]

I read what the right has to say on this issue daily. Once gay marriage is a done deal, this is the next big thing.

You read what the left claims the right has to say on issues.
It's your claim.
Most of us on the right don't give a damn.
Most of the left want's it to be an issue.
More projection.

For you, and that's just the top Google pick: Gender Confusion and the Complicity of Public Schools - Lee Culpepper - Page full

Look, if you've got a thing for trannies, it's you business. No one cares.

 

[alan1]

I read what the right has to say on this issue daily. Once gay marriage is a done deal, this is the next big thing.

You read what the left claims the right has to say on issues.
It's your claim.
Most of us on the right don't give a damn.
Most of the left want's it to be an issue.
More projection.

For you, and that's just the top Google pick: Gender Confusion and the Complicity of Public Schools - Lee Culpepper - Page full

Go paint a different picture.
The one yer painting isn't working.

 

[OKTexas]

Okay, knowing only three things about this person, which are:

1. She's never had any kind of surgery to change her reproductive organs.
2. She looks exactly as you would expect a healthy young woman to look, even below the belt.
3. She is genetically XY.

So, is a boy or a girl?

She doesn't seem to be the least bit confused, so why should anyone else be? BTW what the hell does this have to do with politics?

Because Gender Politics ver. 2 is about to be a huge issue, if you have not heard of it before. So, the question is, how do we really tell if we have a boy or a girl?

Just like we have for ever, so far it's served us pretty well. Birth defects have been around for ever also and we deal with them based on their severity and exactly how they manifest themselves. This has been and always will be medical and science issues, only creeps like you try to make them political.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Okay, knowing only three things about this person, which are:

1. She's never had any kind of surgery to change her reproductive organs.
2. She looks exactly as you would expect a healthy young woman to look, even below the belt.
3. She is genetically XY.

So, is a boy or a girl?

She doesn't seem to be the least bit confused, so why should anyone else be? BTW what the hell does this have to do with politics?

Because Gender Politics ver. 2 is about to be a huge issue, if you have not heard of it before. So, the question is, how do we really tell if we have a boy or a girl?

Just like we have for ever, so far it's served us pretty well. Birth defects have been around for ever also and we deal with them based on their severity and exactly how they manifest themselves. This has been and always will be medical and science issues, only creeps like you try to make them political.

This is a not a birth defect. This is a perfect normal looking girl who has the genetics of a boy, so, which is she, a boy or a girl?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I read what the right has to say on this issue daily. Once gay marriage is a done deal, this is the next big thing.

You read what the left claims the right has to say on issues.
It's your claim.
Most of us on the right don't give a damn.
Most of the left want's it to be an issue.
More projection.

For you, and that's just the top Google pick: Gender Confusion and the Complicity of Public Schools - Lee Culpepper - Page full

Go paint a different picture.
The one yer painting isn't working.

No one is requiring you to respond. Find something else to whine about like a toddler.

 

[OKTexas]

Okay, knowing only three things about this person, which are:

1. She's never had any kind of surgery to change her reproductive organs.
2. She looks exactly as you would expect a healthy young woman to look, even below the belt.
3. She is genetically XY.

So, is a boy or a girl?

She doesn't seem to be the least bit confused, so why should anyone else be? BTW what the hell does this have to do with politics?

Because Gender Politics ver. 2 is about to be a huge issue, if you have not heard of it before. So, the question is, how do we really tell if we have a boy or a girl?

Just like we have for ever, so far it's served us pretty well. Birth defects have been around for ever also and we deal with them based on their severity and exactly how they manifest themselves. This has been and always will be medical and science issues, only creeps like you try to make them political.

This is a not a birth defect. This is a perfect normal looking girl who has the genetics of a boy, so, which is she, a boy or a girl?

You answered your own question when you said SHE. And it is a birth defect.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Okay, knowing only three things about this person, which are:

1. She's never had any kind of surgery to change her reproductive organs.
2. She looks exactly as you would expect a healthy young woman to look, even below the belt.
3. She is genetically XY.

So, is a boy or a girl?

She doesn't seem to be the least bit confused, so why should anyone else be? BTW what the hell does this have to do with politics?

Because Gender Politics ver. 2 is about to be a huge issue, if you have not heard of it before. So, the question is, how do we really tell if we have a boy or a girl?

Just like we have for ever, so far it's served us pretty well. Birth defects have been around for ever also and we deal with them based on their severity and exactly how they manifest themselves. This has been and always will be medical and science issues, only creeps like you try to make them political.

This is a not a birth defect. This is a perfect normal looking girl who has the genetics of a boy, so, which is she, a boy or a girl?

You answered your own question when you said SHE. And it is a birth defect.

No, it isn't a birth defect. It's a genetic alteration that occurred at conception, not during development.

And I know what she is. The question is how do we figure that out?

 

[HenryBHough]

Can she, like you, go **** herself?

And, if so, get pregnant?

 

[PredFan]

When Obama was running for POTUS, both times, it was all about race. Now that Hillary will be running, it's all about gender. You left wing nuts are being played like the puppets you are.

 

[OKTexas]

She doesn't seem to be the least bit confused, so why should anyone else be? BTW what the hell does this have to do with politics?

Because Gender Politics ver. 2 is about to be a huge issue, if you have not heard of it before. So, the question is, how do we really tell if we have a boy or a girl?

Just like we have for ever, so far it's served us pretty well. Birth defects have been around for ever also and we deal with them based on their severity and exactly how they manifest themselves. This has been and always will be medical and science issues, only creeps like you try to make them political.

This is a not a birth defect. This is a perfect normal looking girl who has the genetics of a boy, so, which is she, a boy or a girl?

You answered your own question when you said SHE. And it is a birth defect.

No, it isn't a birth defect. It's a genetic alteration that occurred at conception, not during development.

And I know what she is. The question is how do we figure that out?

Cystic fibrosis occurs at conception also, so you don't consider that a birth defect?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Can she, like you, go **** herself?

And, if so, get pregnant?

The plumbing isn't complete. That goes with the syndrome.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Because Gender Politics ver. 2 is about to be a huge issue, if you have not heard of it before. So, the question is, how do we really tell if we have a boy or a girl?

Just like we have for ever, so far it's served us pretty well. Birth defects have been around for ever also and we deal with them based on their severity and exactly how they manifest themselves. This has been and always will be medical and science issues, only creeps like you try to make them political.

This is a not a birth defect. This is a perfect normal looking girl who has the genetics of a boy, so, which is she, a boy or a girl?

You answered your own question when you said SHE. And it is a birth defect.

No, it isn't a birth defect. It's a genetic alteration that occurred at conception, not during development.

And I know what she is. The question is how do we figure that out?

Cystic fibrosis occurs at conception also, so you don't consider that a birth defect?

Nope. A birth defect only occurs during development, like hypospadias or a cleft palate. CF is a genetic disorder, not a birth defect.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

When Obama was running for POTUS, both times, it was all about race. Now that Hillary will be running, it's all about gender. You left wing nuts are being played like the puppets you are.

The gender discussion is because that is the next big issue after gay marriage. If God makes boys that are girls and girls that are boys, and he does using their theology, then they have a serious issue on their hands. Check out XX males, and XXX and even XXXX. And whatever you do, avoid XYY and XYYY males, they are ******* ticking time-bombs.

 

[kaz]

Okay, knowing only three things about this person, which are:

1. She's never had any kind of surgery to change her reproductive organs.
2. She looks exactly as you would expect a healthy young woman to look, even below the belt.
3. She is genetically XY.

So, is a boy or a girl?

Do you know what a normal distribution is?

At a glance, he looks female, but his facial features are definitely male.