Sky Dancer
Rookie
- Jan 21, 2009
- 19,307
- 1,320
- 0
- Banned
- #101
Who cares really?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
MARRIAGE is fundamental to our existence. The question then becomes... when can government discriminate with regard to marriage?
It seems pretty clear that the answer is, marriage is between consenting adults unless there is a really really good reason for government regulation. So, perhaps the government has a good reason for intervening in cases of sanguinity, but beyond that, it does seem it should keep hands off.
Where are all the libertarians and Goldwater republicans on this issue?
on the sidelines, snickering at the alleged *conservatives* who can't seem to stay the fuck out of other peoples' bedrooms and lives.
thanks for asking
When it came out of the bedroom and demanded an equality that doesn't exist it became everyones issue...
peace...
Loving v made it abundantly clear...
peace...
only to extraordinarily stoooopid people.
Ah... Didn't have anything of substance to counter with eh?...
Welcome back deldo.
peace...
only to extraordinarily stoooopid people.
Ah... Didn't have anything of substance to counter with eh?...
Welcome back deldo.
peace...
i stopped trying to teach pigs to whistle a long time ago, porky.
it's clear that you've never read loving and that you, as usual, just make up shit. have a nice day.
Gay Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival.".
Cool...so why do homophobes give a shit if homos get married or not?
I could understand their concern if homosexuality WAS fundamental to our very existence and survival. But it's not. So who cares? Oh, that's right, homophobes and people who would deny basic civil rights to their fellow human beings. Oh, and religious fundamentalist whackjobs...
No one gives a shit if homos get married. Which is why most people don't want to recognize and legitimize their so-called marriages.
only to extraordinarily stoooopid people.
Ah... Didn't have anything of substance to counter with eh?...
Welcome back deldo.
peace...
i stopped trying to teach pigs to whistle a long time ago, porky.
it's clear that you've never read loving and that you, as usual, just make up shit. have a nice day.
Ah... Didn't have anything of substance to counter with eh?...
Welcome back deldo.
peace...
i stopped trying to teach pigs to whistle a long time ago, porky.
it's clear that you've never read loving and that you, as usual, just make up shit. have a nice day.
Still nothing eh?...
peace...
i stopped trying to teach pigs to whistle a long time ago, porky.
it's clear that you've never read loving and that you, as usual, just make up shit. have a nice day.
Still nothing eh?...
peace...
did i s-s-s-s-s-stutter, porky?
Still nothing eh?...
peace...
did i s-s-s-s-s-stutter, porky?
Is being a debate interrupting asshole troll in your job description?...
I didn't realize you missed me this much fat boy...
peace...
did i s-s-s-s-s-stutter, porky?
Is being a debate interrupting asshole troll in your job description?...
I didn't realize you missed me this much fat boy...
peace...
arguing with the voices in your head (and losing) doesn't constitute a debate, porky. sorry to be the one to break it to you.
perhaps you could link me to the exact part of loving that defines marriage as only between a man and a woman.
alternatively, you could eat shit and bark at the moon-your call.
Is being a debate interrupting asshole troll in your job description?...
I didn't realize you missed me this much fat boy...
peace...
arguing with the voices in your head (and losing) doesn't constitute a debate, porky. sorry to be the one to break it to you.
perhaps you could link me to the exact part of loving that defines marriage as only between a man and a woman.
alternatively, you could eat shit and bark at the moon-your call.
The case was about other than One Man & One Woman?... And our very existence and survival has what to do with Homosexual coupling?...
peace...
Is being a debate interrupting asshole troll in your job description?...
I didn't realize you missed me this much fat boy...
peace...
arguing with the voices in your head (and losing) doesn't constitute a debate, porky. sorry to be the one to break it to you.
perhaps you could link me to the exact part of loving that defines marriage as only between a man and a woman.
alternatively, you could eat shit and bark at the moon-your call.
The case was about other than One Man & One Woman?... And our very existence and survival has what to do with Homosexual coupling?...
peace...
The court ruled that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute violated both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its decision, the court wrote:
Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival.... To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.
Loving v. Virginia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Defense of Marriage Act [DOMA] is what federally defined marriage in 1996, and it still stands to be challenged.
Defense of Marriage Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No it hasn't....unless you want to prove your statement with a link.
Loving v made it abundantly clear...
peace...
only to extraordinarily stoooopid people.
arguing with the voices in your head (and losing) doesn't constitute a debate, porky. sorry to be the one to break it to you.
perhaps you could link me to the exact part of loving that defines marriage as only between a man and a woman.
alternatively, you could eat shit and bark at the moon-your call.
The case was about other than One Man & One Woman?... And our very existence and survival has what to do with Homosexual coupling?...
peace...
fail
again
only to extraordinarily stoooopid people.
Ah... Didn't have anything of substance to counter with eh?...
Welcome back deldo.
peace...
i stopped trying to teach pigs to whistle a long time ago, porky.
it's clear that you've never read loving and that you, as usual, just make up shit. have a nice day.