Not enough to counter the tens of thousands of gays that spend their disposable income there..
Once again we find Seawytch arguing that if there's enough money involved, inappropriate exposure of children to the LGBT "different sexuality" theme at their childrens' theme park is justified and valid.
That's a little disturbing there Seawytch. It almost sounds like you are arguing that a man in a trench coat can flash kids with a sexualized theme as long as the people opening the gate for him at the playground get slipped a $100 bill.
[
Because YOU would suppose the kids would ask, and because YOU would answer it such. YOU are pure filth.
Children are some of the most curious creatures on earth. And when they see a sea of red t-shirts saying "LGBT rights!" or some such similar sexualize theme at Disney, of course they're going to ask their parents what that means. And the answer has to be "those are people who try to reproduce with each other"...because maybe a parent doesn't want to go into lurid graphics of adult human sexuality to their 4 year old. Then the tot will ask, "but mommy, you told me that our girl doggie could only have puppies when a boy doggie got married to her"...
...and so the trouble beings. You either lie to the child to protect the denial system of the church of LGBT, or you change the subject. Either way the child's mind will still strive to undertsand why two people of the same gender are trying to reproduce. Maybe that's the end goal of the presence of the LGBT church at Disney? To introduce that dissonance in a child's mind to soften its logic to the idea of "experimentation outside the box"...?? Actually, I've seen the similarities for so long now between the church of LGBT, its messiah [see my signature] and the grooming behaviors of pedophiles to know that this is most likely the reason LGBTers are present, without warning, at a childrens' theme park at their busiest time of year to "expose" kids to the idea of their tweak as "normal/condoned/ok"...