AsianTrumpSupporter

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2017
4,264
1,126
390
Democratic People's Republique de Californie
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.
 
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.


Actually that's a Bush administration program. Your own link says that.

Your own OP says that.

Keep the class, partisan hack.
 
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.


Actually that's a Bush administration program. Your own link says that.

Your own OP says that.

Keep the class, partisan hack.


The fraud occurred under Obama, but nice try.
 
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.


Actually that's a Bush administration program. Your own link says that.

Your own OP says that.

Keep the class, partisan hack.


The fraud occurred under Obama, but nice try.


If you knew that, then why did you call it "Obamaphones"? Because the Moonie Times told you to?
Good puppet.

Now how do you know when this fraud occurred? The links to the study?

Oh wait ---- there weren't any links to the study. Just the Moonie Times going "take our word for it".
Doesn't take much does it.
 
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.


DEBunked....


  • The Lifeline program originated in 1984, during the administration of Ronald Reagan; it was expanded in 1996, during the administration of Bill Clinton; and its first cellular provider service (SafeLink Wireless) was launched by TracFone in 2008, during the administration of George W. Bush. All of these milestones were passed prior to the advent of the Obama administration.


    The Lifeline program only covers monthly discounts on landline or wireless telephone service for eligible consumers. It does not pay
  • cellular companies to provide free cell phones to consumers, although some cellular service providers choose to offer that benefit to their Lifeline customers.

    Lifeline discounts are not available only to ā€œwelfare recipientsā€ ā€” these programs are implemented at both the state and federal levels, so qualification criteria can vary from state to state, but in general participants must have an income that is at or below 135% of the federal Poverty Guidelines, or take part in at least one of the following federal assistance programs:
 
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.


DEBunked....


by Uranus?
 
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.


Actually that's a Bush administration program. Your own link says that.

Your own OP says that.

Keep the class, partisan hack.


The fraud occurred under Obama, but nice try.


It's funny how when good things happen under Bush and Trump, they're because of Bush and Trump, when bad things happen under Bush and Trump it's Obama's fault. When good things happen under Obama it's Bush's success and when bad things happen under Obama it's because of Obama.

How very convenient.
 
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.


Actually that's a Bush administration program. Your own link says that.

Your own OP says that.

Keep the class, partisan hack.


The fraud occurred under Obama, but nice try.


It's funny how when good things happen under Bush and Trump, they're because of Bush and Trump, when bad things happen under Bush and Trump it's Obama's fault. When good things happen under Obama it's Bush's success and when bad things happen under Obama it's because of Obama.

How very convenient.


If they were so bad, Obama had 8 years to fix them.
 
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.


Actually that's a Bush administration program. Your own link says that.

Your own OP says that.

Keep the class, partisan hack.


The fraud occurred under Obama, but nice try.


It's funny how when good things happen under Bush and Trump, they're because of Bush and Trump, when bad things happen under Bush and Trump it's Obama's fault. When good things happen under Obama it's Bush's success and when bad things happen under Obama it's because of Obama.

How very convenient.


If they were so bad, Obama had 8 years to fix them.


Sure, but then if they're so bad, Trump has had 6 months to fix them, and Bush had time to fix them too, or could have made it so that it wouldn't be so bad in the first place.

But then Trump was boasting about low unemployment rates about 3 minutes after being sworn in, and yet the right give Obama no credit for it at all. You know?

It's called partisan politics and is so full of bullshit that it stinks like hell. And it happens on both sides, and it's driving the country downhill at a fast rate.
 
ā€˜Obamaphoneā€™ program riddled with fraud: Audit

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor, is rife with fraud, according to a new government report released Thursday that found more than a third of enrollees may not even be qualified.

Known officially as the Lifeline Program, the phone giveaway became a symbol of government waste in the previous administration. Now a new report from the Government Accountability Office bears out those concerns.

The report, requested by Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, also says the program has stashed some $9 billion in assets in private bank accounts rather than with the federal treasury, further increasing risks and depriving taxpayers of the full benefit of that money.

ā€œA complete lack of oversight is causing this program to fail the American taxpayer ā€” everything that could go wrong is going wrong,ā€ said Mrs. McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senateā€™s chief oversight committee and who is a former state auditor in Missouri.

ā€œWeā€™re currently letting phone companies cash a government check every month with little more than the honor system to hold them accountable, and that simply canā€™t continue,ā€ she said.

The program, run by the Federal Communications Commission, predates President Obama, but it gained attention during his administration when recipients began to associate the free phone with other benefits he doled out to the poor.

Some 10.6 million people have an Obamaphone, but 36 percent of them may not qualify, investigators said after sampling the population and finding a huge chunk of people couldnā€™t prove they were eligible.

More than 5,500 people were found to be enrolled for two phones, while the program was paying for nearly 6,400 phones for persons the government has listed as having died.

Investigators also submitted fraudulent applications to see what would happen, and 12 of the 19 phone carriers they applied to approved a phone.

The theory behind the program was that poor people needed a phone to apply for a job or conduct other business in the modern economy, so they were provided with what was supposed to be a low-cost, limited-service benefit.

Though the program is administered by the federal government, funding comes from cellphone carriers, who pass the costs on to customers through the universal service fee charge that many see on their monthly bills.

Thursdayā€™s report is just the latest warning from the GAO, which is the governmentā€™s chief watchdog. Previous reports had warned the Obama administration the program was susceptible to double-dipping, and that the FCC didnā€™t even have a good yardstick to measure whether the program was meeting its goals.

The FCC had promised to make changes, but the new report says those have fallen short.



Credit to Conservative Mexican for bringing this story to my attention.

Keep the change, Obama.

It's Trumphone now how about you get him to do something about it. Pull up your bootstraps and stop whining.
 
The federal government continues to illustrate complete and total ineptitude handling anything outside of their 18 enumerated powers. And progressives continue to illustrate complete and total stupidity attempting to defend that which is utterly indefensible.
The GAO reports that after basic eligibility checks were instituted, the cellphones-for-the-poor program shrunk by a third, from $2.2 billion to $1.5 billion. In the 30 days following the addition of meager but previously absent anti-fraud measures, monthly payments dropped $40 million. Incredibly, the 65% rate of easily detectable fraud is what remained after those huge numbers of fraudsters dropped off the rolls.
Obamaphone Fraud as High as 65%
 
Actually that's a Bush administration program. Your own link says that.Your own OP says that. Keep the class, partisan hack.
The astounding ineptitude of the federal government that your worship and submit to is exceeded only by your astounding ignorance. The program was created by the FCC in the 1980's. It was not created by the Bush Administration and it was not created by the Reagan Administration.

Now, the FCC is an unconstitutional independent government agency that was formed by the power-hungry asshole, FDR (a Dumbocrat, of course). Proving yet again that the source of all fraud, spending, ineptitude, and unconstitutional actions are the Dumbocrats.
 
These numbers prove the astounding ignorance of the left when they claim that the source of our $20 trillion debt is defense spending. $2.2 billion per year for something that is completely unconstitutional is outrageous. $40 million per month in fraud because of the ineptitude of the federal government is outrageous.
The GAO reports that after basic eligibility checks were instituted, the cellphones-for-the-poor program shrunk by a third, from $2.2 billion to $1.5 billion. In the 30 days following the addition of meager but previously absent anti-fraud measures, monthly payments dropped $40 million. Incredibly, the 65% rate of easily detectable fraud is what remained after those huge numbers of fraudsters dropped off the rolls.
Obamaphone Fraud as High as 65%
 
Actually that's a Bush administration program. Your own link says that.Your own OP says that. Keep the class, partisan hack.
The astounding ineptitude of the federal government that your worship and submit to is exceeded only by your astounding ignorance. The program was created by the FCC in the 1980's. It was not created by the Bush Administration and it was not created by the Reagan Administration.

Now, the FCC is an unconstitutional independent government agency that was formed by the power-hungry asshole, FDR (a Dumbocrat, of course). Proving yet again that the source of all fraud, spending, ineptitude, and unconstitutional actions are the Dumbocrats.

:rofl:
Actually it was created by, and is directly responsible to, the United States Congress and set up intentionally to be immune to Presidential influence, and it developed out of the Federal Radio Commission (1926-1934) that was in turn created to regulate the then-new medium of radio, under the direction of Herbert Hoover. But thanks for letting me know I underestimated the depth of your ignoramitude.

And no, there's nothing "unconstitutional" about it. I'm afraid posting the word "unconstitutional" on the internet doesn't bestow that status, not even if you underline it.

As for the history, the OP reads, and I quote,

The controversial ā€œObamaphoneā€ program, which pays for cellphones for the poor,

See if you can find the word "cellphones" in there. Whelp, that went into effect in 2005.

That about it? Or do you have even more historical ineptitude you'd like to trot out?

By the way I know I'm way smarter than you (who isn't) but there's no need to address me as "your worship".
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top