Gabby Giffords Turns Slimewad

[TemplarKormac]

Sure, people who have integrity outright lie about people, accuse them of essentially murdering someone. I have more integrity in the gaps between my toenails than she does. That's a fact.

is that what gabby giffords did..???

Yeah, she runs the PAC that ran the ad. Perhaps you should read the news more often.

 

[Pogo]

Sure, people who have integrity outright lie about people, accuse them of essentially murdering someone. I have more integrity in the gaps between my toenails than she does. That's a fact.

is that what gabby giffords did..???

Yeah, she runs the PAC that ran the ad. Perhaps you should read the news more often.

Just, y'know, for what it's worth TK ..... this AridZona site fact checked the issue the ad is raising and concluded a rating of "four stars true".

Notice also the complaint in the OP article describes the ads as "base and vile". It does not however describe them as "inaccurate". Right after that the same blurb asks the PAC, again, not "why do you make stuff up" but rather... "do you know what you're doing?"

Well, according to this entry on the PAC's website .... apparently they do.

 

[JoeB131]

Wasn't this thread about Gabby Giffords and her using the sympathy she's engendered to try and skirt the issue of integrity in the ads her PAC is running ?

Gabby has more integrity in her pinky finger than you, the slimeball who posted this OP...

Sure, people who have integrity outright lie about people, accuse them of essentially murdering someone. I have more integrity in the gaps between my toenails than she does. That's a fact.

You have so much integrity that people can't wait to hire you.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Well, it was bound to happen.

Giffords is now utilizing her elevated position and all the sympathy she can muster to run ads against those who support the constitution.

Go figure.

She was never that good before and obviously isn't getting any better.

STFU Gabby.

Mad Gabby Former Congresswoman Unleashes Nasty Ads Against Pro-Second Amendment Candidates - Matt Vespa

I knew the gunnies would eventually go and attack Gabby Giffords.
Apparently you don't like the constitution-- the first amendment.

Apparently you don't understand that the 1st amendment has limits, and lying in public about other people is outside them.

 

[Listening]

Wasn't this thread about Gabby Giffords and her using the sympathy she's engendered to try and skirt the issue of integrity in the ads her PAC is running ?

Gabby has more integrity in her pinky finger than you, the slimeball who posted this OP...

Sure, people who have integrity outright lie about people, accuse them of essentially murdering someone. I have more integrity in the gaps between my toenails than she does. That's a fact.

is that what gabby giffords did..???

Post # 700.

Really ????

 

[Listening]

Go Gabby!. Give those NRA NaziCons hell.

It's difficult to imagine a bigger liar or turd than you.

 

[Listening]

Sure, people who have integrity outright lie about people, accuse them of essentially murdering someone. I have more integrity in the gaps between my toenails than she does. That's a fact.

is that what gabby giffords did..???

Yeah, she runs the PAC that ran the ad. Perhaps you should read the news more often.

Just, y'know, for what it's worth TK ..... this AridZona site fact checked the issue the ad is raising and concluded a rating of "four stars true".

Notice also the complaint in the OP article describes the ads as "base and vile". It does not however describe them as "inaccurate". Right after that the same blurb asks the PAC, again, not "why do you make stuff up" but rather... "do you know what you're doing?"

Well, according to this entry on the PAC's website .... apparently they do.

The issue it "fact checked" is nothing but a side show to the point at hand.

This is from the article:

In the (now pulled) commercial, Giffords’s team accuses the candidate of failing to care about women who have been stalked and of objecting to laws that make it tough for stalkers to get guns — both of which charges, it turns out, are false. McSally, the Arizona Republic reports, has not only been a victim of stalking herself, but she supports all the existing laws that make it tough for convicted stalkers to obtain firearms. Oops.

*************************************

Ooops is right.

Giffords is a liar.

 

[Pogo]

Sure, people who have integrity outright lie about people, accuse them of essentially murdering someone. I have more integrity in the gaps between my toenails than she does. That's a fact.

is that what gabby giffords did..???

Yeah, she runs the PAC that ran the ad. Perhaps you should read the news more often.

Just, y'know, for what it's worth TK ..... this AridZona site fact checked the issue the ad is raising and concluded a rating of "four stars true".

Notice also the complaint in the OP article describes the ads as "base and vile". It does not however describe them as "inaccurate". Right after that the same blurb asks the PAC, again, not "why do you make stuff up" but rather... "do you know what you're doing?"

Well, according to this entry on the PAC's website .... apparently they do.

The issue it "fact checked" is nothing but a side show to the point at hand.

This is from the article:

In the (now pulled) commercial, Giffords’s team accuses the candidate of failing to care about women who have been stalked and of objecting to laws that make it tough for stalkers to get guns — both of which charges, it turns out, are false. McSally, the Arizona Republic reports, has not only been a victim of stalking herself, but she supports all the existing laws that make it tough for convicted stalkers to obtain firearms. Oops.

*************************************

Ooops is right.

Giffords is a liar.

Opinions cannot be "true" or "false", stupid. Only facts can do that.

 

[Listening]

Sure, people who have integrity outright lie about people, accuse them of essentially murdering someone. I have more integrity in the gaps between my toenails than she does. That's a fact.

is that what gabby giffords did..???

Yeah, she runs the PAC that ran the ad. Perhaps you should read the news more often.

Just, y'know, for what it's worth TK ..... this AridZona site fact checked the issue the ad is raising and concluded a rating of "four stars true".

Notice also the complaint in the OP article describes the ads as "base and vile". It does not however describe them as "inaccurate". Right after that the same blurb asks the PAC, again, not "why do you make stuff up" but rather... "do you know what you're doing?"

Well, according to this entry on the PAC's website .... apparently they do.

The issue it "fact checked" is nothing but a side show to the point at hand.

This is from the article:

In the (now pulled) commercial, Giffords’s team accuses the candidate of failing to care about women who have been stalked and of objecting to laws that make it tough for stalkers to get guns — both of which charges, it turns out, are false. McSally, the Arizona Republic reports, has not only been a victim of stalking herself, but she supports all the existing laws that make it tough for convicted stalkers to obtain firearms. Oops.

*************************************

Ooops is right.

Giffords is a liar.

Opinions cannot be "true" or "false", stupid. Only facts can do that.

Why don't you change your moniker to "Red Herring" ?

The ad was pulled is "an opinion".

 

[Pogo]

is that what gabby giffords did..???

Yeah, she runs the PAC that ran the ad. Perhaps you should read the news more often.

Just, y'know, for what it's worth TK ..... this AridZona site fact checked the issue the ad is raising and concluded a rating of "four stars true".

Notice also the complaint in the OP article describes the ads as "base and vile". It does not however describe them as "inaccurate". Right after that the same blurb asks the PAC, again, not "why do you make stuff up" but rather... "do you know what you're doing?"

Well, according to this entry on the PAC's website .... apparently they do.

The issue it "fact checked" is nothing but a side show to the point at hand.

This is from the article:

In the (now pulled) commercial, Giffords’s team accuses the candidate of failing to care about women who have been stalked and of objecting to laws that make it tough for stalkers to get guns — both of which charges, it turns out, are false. McSally, the Arizona Republic reports, has not only been a victim of stalking herself, but she supports all the existing laws that make it tough for convicted stalkers to obtain firearms. Oops.

*************************************

Ooops is right.

Giffords is a liar.

Opinions cannot be "true" or "false", stupid. Only facts can do that.

Why don't you change your moniker to "Red Herring" ?

The ad was pulled is "an opinion".

No shit, Sherlock. That's why when you say "both of which charges, it turns out, are false" you're full of shit. Again -- get your teacher to read this to you slowly one word at a time if that's what it takes -- opinions cannot be "true" or "false".

 

[Listening]

Yeah, she runs the PAC that ran the ad. Perhaps you should read the news more often.

Just, y'know, for what it's worth TK ..... this AridZona site fact checked the issue the ad is raising and concluded a rating of "four stars true".

Notice also the complaint in the OP article describes the ads as "base and vile". It does not however describe them as "inaccurate". Right after that the same blurb asks the PAC, again, not "why do you make stuff up" but rather... "do you know what you're doing?"

Well, according to this entry on the PAC's website .... apparently they do.

The issue it "fact checked" is nothing but a side show to the point at hand.

This is from the article:

In the (now pulled) commercial, Giffords’s team accuses the candidate of failing to care about women who have been stalked and of objecting to laws that make it tough for stalkers to get guns — both of which charges, it turns out, are false. McSally, the Arizona Republic reports, has not only been a victim of stalking herself, but she supports all the existing laws that make it tough for convicted stalkers to obtain firearms. Oops.

*************************************

Ooops is right.

Giffords is a liar.

Opinions cannot be "true" or "false", stupid. Only facts can do that.

Why don't you change your moniker to "Red Herring" ?

The ad was pulled is "an opinion".

No shit, Sherlock. That's why when you say "both of which charges, it turns out, are false" you're full of shit. Again -- get your teacher to read this to you slowly one word at a time if that's what it takes -- opinions cannot be "true" or "false".

So you agree your moniker should be "Red Herring" ?

Glad we got that cleared up.