Fuel Cell Technology Turns The EV Corner

[Grumblenuts]

Rule of thumb: Not toxic if you bake with it.

 

[JohnDB]

Sulfurous Acid

Sulfurous Acid | H2O3S | CID 1100 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, safety/hazards/toxicity information, supplier lists, and more.

pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Sodium Bicarbonate

Sodium Bicarbonate | NaHCO3 or CHNaO3 | CID 516892 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, safety/hazards/toxicity information, supplier lists, and more.

pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Not classified is not a license to spread it around everywhere. Especially in large quantities. Just pour a box of Arm and Hammer on your wife's rosebushes and see what happens.

 

[Old Rocks]

I just hope we're smart enough as a country to not suppress innovative technology advances because of some entrenched technologies.

That is happening right now with this admin. Suppressing renewable energy and not supporting putting battery advances into production. In the meantime, China is eating our lunch on EV's and high density batteries with new, less costly, and safer chemistries.

 

[westwall]

That is happening right now with this admin. Suppressing renewable energy and not supporting putting battery advances into production. In the meantime, China is eating our lunch on EV's and high density batteries with new, less costly, and safer chemistries.

Nothing is being suppressed. They simply are no longer rewarding failure.

 

[Old Rocks]

Hydrogen is a by-product of the oil and gas industry. It can be extremely cheap to produce

Democrats can not control people if they can afford energy, hence the democrats forcing us to live off expensive unaffordable throw away batteries instead of great cheap energy

What a dummy you are. First, yes, hydrogen can be produced from hydrocarbons. Which means you have hydrogen and CO2 as a byproduct that is vented into the atmosphere. Second, solar and wind are the least expensive form of electrical production. And EV's are far less costly to run than ICE cars. It is very difficult to produce hydrogen at home, but you can install solar and make your own fuel for your vehicle and power your home. Third, the batteries, no matter what the chemistry, are recyclable, and there are now companies recycling them at a profit. Fossil fuels are not cheap when you consider all the effects of their use.

 

[Old Rocks]

Nothing is being suppressed. They simply are no longer rewarding failure.

Once again you spew lies. Renewables accounted for 90% of new generation in the first three months of 2024. Not because of government subsidies, but because they are the least expensive way of generating electricity, and the quickest to install and put on line. With the new and much less costly air-iron batteries, they are 24/7, with far less maintenance than fossil fuel generation. And the US has developed some batteries that would easily give EV's well over 500 miles range, are less costly, and could compete with Chinese batteries.

Renewables Account for 90% of US Power Generation in 2024 - The Renewable Energy Institute

Renewable energy made up nearly 90% of the total US power generation capacity added during the first 3 quarters of 2024, as per a review conducted by the SUN DAY Campaign using Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) data.

www.renewableinstitute.org

 

[elektra]

What a dummy you are. First, yes, hydrogen can be produced from hydrocarbons. Which means you have hydrogen and CO2 as a byproduct that is vented into the atmosphere. Second, solar and wind are the least expensive form of electrical production. And EV's are far less costly to run than ICE cars. It is very difficult to produce hydrogen at home, but you can install solar and make your own fuel for your vehicle and power your home. Third, the batteries, no matter what the chemistry, are recyclable, and there are now companies recycling them at a profit. Fossil fuels are not cheap when you consider all the effects of their use.

Haha, solar and wind are not a source of energy and are not cheap by any means.

How much can solar and wind provide tonight and at what cost.

Prove your stupidity, again