"FRAUD!...FRAUD!...FRAUD!" until they get into Court...then

[Sun Devil 92]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont/ar-BB1aZ2QK


The Trump campaign or Republican allies have brought lawsuits in several battleground states contesting election results that favored President-elect Joe Biden, seeking to stop the certification of results or have ballots thrown out. Under questioning from judges handling the cases, at least two of Mr. Trump’s lawyers have backed away from suggestions that the election was stolen or fraudulent.

In other instances, attorneys representing Mr. Trump or other Republicans have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud. Lawyers also have struggled to get what they say is evidence of fraud admitted into lawsuits, with judges dismissing it as inadmissible or unreliable. A coalition of organizations representing secretaries of state, federal agencies and other top election officials said Thursday there wasn’t evidence that voting systems were compromised during the election.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I heard trump on a daily basis shouting FRAUD!. I read all your posts on the massive stash pf Fraud evidence. You and the Liar in Chief are quick to shout Fraud, but when the attorneys get into Court, there is a hesitation to use the word Fraud. BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY WILL BE SANCTIONED AND POSSIBLY LOSS THEIR LAW LICENSE. Even the top law enforcement officer in the nation has said there is no fraud that would change the results of the election.

If you have evidence of massive fraud, send it to Rudy. Otherwise....SHUT UP!

Hey....Spamboi....

Stop wit the same fucking threads all the time.

We still have questions about what judges are doing. This should open everyone's eyes.

How did you dickweeds not figure out.

Please stop being a horse's ass and tell me what, if anything, in this thread is incorrect.....hint.....NOTHING!

Who is going to listen to your precious coalition when their behavior has been partisan from the start.

Dumbass.

Courts are not partisan. Unfortunately for trump, they rely on facts and evidence. Therein lies the real problem for Rudy and his Circus. THEY GOT NOTHING!

Courts are not partisan.....?????

Holy fuck.

Then why did your side go off the rails about ACB.

 

[Lysistrata]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont/ar-BB1aZ2QK


The Trump campaign or Republican allies have brought lawsuits in several battleground states contesting election results that favored President-elect Joe Biden, seeking to stop the certification of results or have ballots thrown out. Under questioning from judges handling the cases, at least two of Mr. Trump’s lawyers have backed away from suggestions that the election was stolen or fraudulent.

In other instances, attorneys representing Mr. Trump or other Republicans have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud. Lawyers also have struggled to get what they say is evidence of fraud admitted into lawsuits, with judges dismissing it as inadmissible or unreliable. A coalition of organizations representing secretaries of state, federal agencies and other top election officials said Thursday there wasn’t evidence that voting systems were compromised during the election.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I heard trump on a daily basis shouting FRAUD!. I read all your posts on the massive stash pf Fraud evidence. You and the Liar in Chief are quick to shout Fraud, but when the attorneys get into Court, there is a hesitation to use the word Fraud. BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY WILL BE SANCTIONED AND POSSIBLY LOSS THEIR LAW LICENSE. Even the top law enforcement officer in the nation has said there is no fraud that would change the results of the election.

If you have evidence of massive fraud, send it to Rudy. Otherwise....SHUT UP!

Hey....Spamboi....

Stop wit the same fucking threads all the time.

We still have questions about what judges are doing. This should open everyone's eyes.

How did you dickweeds not figure out.

Please stop being a horse's ass and tell me what, if anything, in this thread is incorrect.....hint.....NOTHING!

Who is going to listen to your precious coalition when their behavior has been partisan from the start.

Dumbass.

Sure, fella. This is way trump has complained about "the Democrats" in just about every speech he has ever made. No partisanship there.

 

[JimH52]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO
[/QUOTE
The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

Or.....its just a shit legal argument. Judge Brann is a life long republican. And he had this to say of Trump's legal efforts when he dismissed their suit with prejudice:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. "


And Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump himself. It didn't go any better.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Justice denials? --
What is it you don't understand about a high government official filmed making whoopie with his 5 year old kid not wanting his wife of 40 years to see him in such an action or worse. You have no idea what is in an FBI file, do you. Hillary is a Hill critter, and people who know the dark side of her domination of DNC doings do as she orders to keep the past back when or commit suicide after a runin with Lady MacBeth.

What batshit crazy are you talkin now...jesus

Its a fairly generic attempt at changing the topic, by the looks of it.

Folks usually resort to them when the topic being discussed isn't going so well.

"Hillary"? I knew someone would find a way to sneak her name into the Thread....

Yeah, its got a distinctly word salad vibe to it, doesn't it?

But given that Trump's legal team has yet to argue in court that fraud every occurred as part of their legal argument......what else are they going to do?

Acknowledge they've been played?

They always delete the term "Fraud" from their filed case....Why? Cause they cannot support the claim and Judges do not look favorably on Lawyers that Lie to them. All these "hearings on fraud" are circuses for the general public. The mean NOTHING!

They've been straight up asked, again and again, if they are moving forward with a fraud allegation. The answer has been a consistent HELL no.

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

Its a HUGE tell.

I hope soon that Rudy will answer "Yes!" I would love to see his bald, dye dripping head, in federal court with his law license in jeopardy. The trump team is trying to convince his cult that he was cheated. But he cannot win in the Court of Public Opinion. He has to win in Real Court Rooms. He has failed over and over.

 

[beautress]

You can see the desperation and fear dripping off of this turd.

It's not desperation, it's boredom. The entertainment value of message board discussion has went way down since you people turned the entire website into a conspiracy theory board. I enjoy talking about politics but this shit is like a board devoted to Bigfoot or ghosts or something else nonexistent.

The trumpster get really annoyed and start calling names when actual facts are disclosed. I wonder if the crazy fraud talk and conspiracy theories will stop after Biden is certified by the EC in a few days? Naw....it won't.

All this is headed for open calls by the right for the overthrow of the federal government. It's not going to stop. It's going to get way worse.

Republicans who support President Trump will fight the double standard, omeurta and all. And this time, we won't let Nancy primp her way into beauty salons she won't let others go to for a pretty coif to wear to an important occasion.

I don't think Nancy Pelosi's hairstyle is going to be admissible evidence in Trump's election conspiracy.

All those fancy folks in big cities who order their constituents to stay out of restaurants and grooming salons are being shown on Newsmax photo clips doing exactly what they ordered everyone else not to do wreeks of royaltyism and "for thee, but not me." Your DNC royals are snotballs.

Which has what to do with Trump's legal arguments in court being void of accusations of fraud?

I answered a question put to me on this thread. If it irritates you that much, plz put me on ignore. Thx.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont/ar-BB1aZ2QK


The Trump campaign or Republican allies have brought lawsuits in several battleground states contesting election results that favored President-elect Joe Biden, seeking to stop the certification of results or have ballots thrown out. Under questioning from judges handling the cases, at least two of Mr. Trump’s lawyers have backed away from suggestions that the election was stolen or fraudulent.

In other instances, attorneys representing Mr. Trump or other Republicans have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud. Lawyers also have struggled to get what they say is evidence of fraud admitted into lawsuits, with judges dismissing it as inadmissible or unreliable. A coalition of organizations representing secretaries of state, federal agencies and other top election officials said Thursday there wasn’t evidence that voting systems were compromised during the election.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I heard trump on a daily basis shouting FRAUD!. I read all your posts on the massive stash pf Fraud evidence. You and the Liar in Chief are quick to shout Fraud, but when the attorneys get into Court, there is a hesitation to use the word Fraud. BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY WILL BE SANCTIONED AND POSSIBLY LOSS THEIR LAW LICENSE. Even the top law enforcement officer in the nation has said there is no fraud that would change the results of the election.

If you have evidence of massive fraud, send it to Rudy. Otherwise....SHUT UP!

Hey....Spamboi....

Stop wit the same fucking threads all the time.

We still have questions about what judges are doing. This should open everyone's eyes.

How did you dickweeds not figure out.

Please stop being a horse's ass and tell me what, if anything, in this thread is incorrect.....hint.....NOTHING!

Who is going to listen to your precious coalition when their behavior has been partisan from the start.

Dumbass.

Sure, fella. This is way trump has complained about "the Democrats" in just about every speech he has ever made. No partisanship there.

You might want to pull your head from your ass and wipe the shit off your face.

Voting is what separates partisans.

If those running the show are partisan....it's a lot worse.

 

[JimH52]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont/ar-BB1aZ2QK


The Trump campaign or Republican allies have brought lawsuits in several battleground states contesting election results that favored President-elect Joe Biden, seeking to stop the certification of results or have ballots thrown out. Under questioning from judges handling the cases, at least two of Mr. Trump’s lawyers have backed away from suggestions that the election was stolen or fraudulent.

In other instances, attorneys representing Mr. Trump or other Republicans have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud. Lawyers also have struggled to get what they say is evidence of fraud admitted into lawsuits, with judges dismissing it as inadmissible or unreliable. A coalition of organizations representing secretaries of state, federal agencies and other top election officials said Thursday there wasn’t evidence that voting systems were compromised during the election.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I heard trump on a daily basis shouting FRAUD!. I read all your posts on the massive stash pf Fraud evidence. You and the Liar in Chief are quick to shout Fraud, but when the attorneys get into Court, there is a hesitation to use the word Fraud. BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY WILL BE SANCTIONED AND POSSIBLY LOSS THEIR LAW LICENSE. Even the top law enforcement officer in the nation has said there is no fraud that would change the results of the election.

If you have evidence of massive fraud, send it to Rudy. Otherwise....SHUT UP!

Hey....Spamboi....

Stop wit the same fucking threads all the time.

We still have questions about what judges are doing. This should open everyone's eyes.

How did you dickweeds not figure out.

Please stop being a horse's ass and tell me what, if anything, in this thread is incorrect.....hint.....NOTHING!

Who is going to listen to your precious coalition when their behavior has been partisan from the start.

Dumbass.

Courts are not partisan. Unfortunately for trump, they rely on facts and evidence. Therein lies the real problem for Rudy and his Circus. THEY GOT NOTHING!

Courts are not partisan.....?????

Holy fuck.

Then why did your side go off the rails about ACB.

The trump legal, dye dripping, team has had a month and they have nothing to produce in evidence. A few more day and the EC votes.....It Is Over.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO
[/QUOTE
The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

Or.....its just a shit legal argument. Judge Brann is a life long republican. And he had this to say of Trump's legal efforts when he dismissed their suit with prejudice:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. "


And Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump himself. It didn't go any better.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Justice denials? --
What is it you don't understand about a high government official filmed making whoopie with his 5 year old kid not wanting his wife of 40 years to see him in such an action or worse. You have no idea what is in an FBI file, do you. Hillary is a Hill critter, and people who know the dark side of her domination of DNC doings do as she orders to keep the past back when or commit suicide after a runin with Lady MacBeth.

What batshit crazy are you talkin now...jesus

Its a fairly generic attempt at changing the topic, by the looks of it.

Folks usually resort to them when the topic being discussed isn't going so well.

"Hillary"? I knew someone would find a way to sneak her name into the Thread....

Yeah, its got a distinctly word salad vibe to it, doesn't it?

But given that Trump's legal team has yet to argue in court that fraud every occurred as part of their legal argument......what else are they going to do?

Acknowledge they've been played?

They always delete the term "Fraud" from their filed case....Why? Cause they cannot support the claim and Judges do not look favorably on Lawyers that Lie to them. All these "hearings on fraud" are circuses for the general public. The mean NOTHING!

They've been straight up asked, again and again, if they are moving forward with a fraud allegation. The answer has been a consistent HELL no.

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

Its a HUGE tell.

I hope soon that Rudy will answer "Yes!" I would love to see his bald, dye dripping head, in federal court with his law license in jeopardy. The trump team is trying to convince his cult that he was cheated. But he cannot win in the Court of Public Opinion. He has to win in Real Court Rooms. He has failed over and over.

And....?

 

[Skylar]

You can see the desperation and fear dripping off of this turd.

It's not desperation, it's boredom. The entertainment value of message board discussion has went way down since you people turned the entire website into a conspiracy theory board. I enjoy talking about politics but this shit is like a board devoted to Bigfoot or ghosts or something else nonexistent.

The trumpster get really annoyed and start calling names when actual facts are disclosed. I wonder if the crazy fraud talk and conspiracy theories will stop after Biden is certified by the EC in a few days? Naw....it won't.

All this is headed for open calls by the right for the overthrow of the federal government. It's not going to stop. It's going to get way worse.

Republicans who support President Trump will fight the double standard, omeurta and all. And this time, we won't let Nancy primp her way into beauty salons she won't let others go to for a pretty coif to wear to an important occasion.

I don't think Nancy Pelosi's hairstyle is going to be admissible evidence in Trump's election conspiracy.

All those fancy folks in big cities who order their constituents to stay out of restaurants and grooming salons are being shown on Newsmax photo clips doing exactly what they ordered everyone else not to do wreeks of royaltyism and "for thee, but not me." Your DNC royals are snotballs.

Which has what to do with Trump's legal arguments in court being void of accusations of fraud?

I answered a question put to me on this thread. If it irritates you that much, plz put me on ignore. Thx.

I'll pass. I don't put people on ignore as a general rule.

If you ever have anything relevant to offer related to the OP, give us a holler.

 

[JimH52]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont/ar-BB1aZ2QK


The Trump campaign or Republican allies have brought lawsuits in several battleground states contesting election results that favored President-elect Joe Biden, seeking to stop the certification of results or have ballots thrown out. Under questioning from judges handling the cases, at least two of Mr. Trump’s lawyers have backed away from suggestions that the election was stolen or fraudulent.

In other instances, attorneys representing Mr. Trump or other Republicans have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud. Lawyers also have struggled to get what they say is evidence of fraud admitted into lawsuits, with judges dismissing it as inadmissible or unreliable. A coalition of organizations representing secretaries of state, federal agencies and other top election officials said Thursday there wasn’t evidence that voting systems were compromised during the election.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I heard trump on a daily basis shouting FRAUD!. I read all your posts on the massive stash pf Fraud evidence. You and the Liar in Chief are quick to shout Fraud, but when the attorneys get into Court, there is a hesitation to use the word Fraud. BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY WILL BE SANCTIONED AND POSSIBLY LOSS THEIR LAW LICENSE. Even the top law enforcement officer in the nation has said there is no fraud that would change the results of the election.

If you have evidence of massive fraud, send it to Rudy. Otherwise....SHUT UP!

Hey....Spamboi....

Stop wit the same fucking threads all the time.

We still have questions about what judges are doing. This should open everyone's eyes.

How did you dickweeds not figure out.

Please stop being a horse's ass and tell me what, if anything, in this thread is incorrect.....hint.....NOTHING!

Who is going to listen to your precious coalition when their behavior has been partisan from the start.

Dumbass.

Sure, fella. This is way trump has complained about "the Democrats" in just about every speech he has ever made. No partisanship there.

You might want to pull your head from your ass and wipe the shit off your face.

Voting is what separates partisans.

If those running the show are partisan....it's a lot worse.

Judge appointed by trump have thrown out the cases filed. Next assertion please....

 

[beautress]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO
[/QUOTE
The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

Or.....its just a shit legal argument. Judge Brann is a life long republican. And he had this to say of Trump's legal efforts when he dismissed their suit with prejudice:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. "


And Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump himself. It didn't go any better.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Justice denials? --
What is it you don't understand about a high government official filmed making whoopie with his 5 year old kid not wanting his wife of 40 years to see him in such an action or worse. You have no idea what is in an FBI file, do you. Hillary is a Hill critter, and people who know the dark side of her domination of DNC doings do as she orders to keep the past back when or commit suicide after a runin with Lady MacBeth.

What batshit crazy are you talkin now...jesus

Its a fairly generic attempt at changing the topic, by the looks of it.

Folks usually resort to them when the topic being discussed isn't going so well.

"Hillary"? I knew someone would find a way to sneak her name into the Thread....

Yeah, its got a distinctly word salad vibe to it, doesn't it?

But given that Trump's legal team has yet to argue in court that fraud every occurred as part of their legal argument......what else are they going to do?

Acknowledge they've been played?

They always delete the term "Fraud" from their filed case....Why? Cause they cannot support the claim and Judges do not look favorably on Lawyers that Lie to them. All these "hearings on fraud" are circuses for the general public. The mean NOTHING!

They've been straight up asked, again and again, if they are moving forward with a fraud allegation. The answer has been a consistent HELL no.

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

Its a HUGE tell.

I hope soon that Rudy will answer "Yes!" I would love to see his bald, dye dripping head, in federal court with his law license in jeopardy. The trump team is trying to convince his cult that he was cheated. But he cannot win in the Court of Public Opinion. He has to win in Real Court Rooms. He has failed over and over.

Rudy is dealing with worse opponents than street swine who kill people. Rudy zeroed in on defending the U. S. Constitution, and he will win. Get used to it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont/ar-BB1aZ2QK


The Trump campaign or Republican allies have brought lawsuits in several battleground states contesting election results that favored President-elect Joe Biden, seeking to stop the certification of results or have ballots thrown out. Under questioning from judges handling the cases, at least two of Mr. Trump’s lawyers have backed away from suggestions that the election was stolen or fraudulent.

In other instances, attorneys representing Mr. Trump or other Republicans have said under oath they have no evidence of fraud. Lawyers also have struggled to get what they say is evidence of fraud admitted into lawsuits, with judges dismissing it as inadmissible or unreliable. A coalition of organizations representing secretaries of state, federal agencies and other top election officials said Thursday there wasn’t evidence that voting systems were compromised during the election.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I heard trump on a daily basis shouting FRAUD!. I read all your posts on the massive stash pf Fraud evidence. You and the Liar in Chief are quick to shout Fraud, but when the attorneys get into Court, there is a hesitation to use the word Fraud. BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY WILL BE SANCTIONED AND POSSIBLY LOSS THEIR LAW LICENSE. Even the top law enforcement officer in the nation has said there is no fraud that would change the results of the election.

If you have evidence of massive fraud, send it to Rudy. Otherwise....SHUT UP!

Hey....Spamboi....

Stop wit the same fucking threads all the time.

We still have questions about what judges are doing. This should open everyone's eyes.

How did you dickweeds not figure out.

Please stop being a horse's ass and tell me what, if anything, in this thread is incorrect.....hint.....NOTHING!

Who is going to listen to your precious coalition when their behavior has been partisan from the start.

Dumbass.

Sure, fella. This is way trump has complained about "the Democrats" in just about every speech he has ever made. No partisanship there.

You might want to pull your head from your ass and wipe the shit off your face.

Voting is what separates partisans.

If those running the show are partisan....it's a lot worse.

Judge appointed by trump have thrown out the cases filed. Next assertion please....

So what ? It does not make the system any less partisan.

It just means Trump apponted judges who are not cocksucking lemmings like the ones on the left.

 

[JimH52]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO
[/QUOTE
The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

Or.....its just a shit legal argument. Judge Brann is a life long republican. And he had this to say of Trump's legal efforts when he dismissed their suit with prejudice:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. "


And Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump himself. It didn't go any better.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Justice denials? --
What is it you don't understand about a high government official filmed making whoopie with his 5 year old kid not wanting his wife of 40 years to see him in such an action or worse. You have no idea what is in an FBI file, do you. Hillary is a Hill critter, and people who know the dark side of her domination of DNC doings do as she orders to keep the past back when or commit suicide after a runin with Lady MacBeth.

What batshit crazy are you talkin now...jesus

Its a fairly generic attempt at changing the topic, by the looks of it.

Folks usually resort to them when the topic being discussed isn't going so well.

"Hillary"? I knew someone would find a way to sneak her name into the Thread....

Yeah, its got a distinctly word salad vibe to it, doesn't it?

But given that Trump's legal team has yet to argue in court that fraud every occurred as part of their legal argument......what else are they going to do?

Acknowledge they've been played?

They always delete the term "Fraud" from their filed case....Why? Cause they cannot support the claim and Judges do not look favorably on Lawyers that Lie to them. All these "hearings on fraud" are circuses for the general public. The mean NOTHING!

They've been straight up asked, again and again, if they are moving forward with a fraud allegation. The answer has been a consistent HELL no.

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

Its a HUGE tell.

I hope soon that Rudy will answer "Yes!" I would love to see his bald, dye dripping head, in federal court with his law license in jeopardy. The trump team is trying to convince his cult that he was cheated. But he cannot win in the Court of Public Opinion. He has to win in Real Court Rooms. He has failed over and over.

And....?

I LOVE WATCHING trump LOSE OVER AND OVER AND OVER....SO FULFILLING! Makes my Christmas Merry! How about yours?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO
[/QUOTE
The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

Or.....its just a shit legal argument. Judge Brann is a life long republican. And he had this to say of Trump's legal efforts when he dismissed their suit with prejudice:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. "


And Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump himself. It didn't go any better.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Justice denials? --
What is it you don't understand about a high government official filmed making whoopie with his 5 year old kid not wanting his wife of 40 years to see him in such an action or worse. You have no idea what is in an FBI file, do you. Hillary is a Hill critter, and people who know the dark side of her domination of DNC doings do as she orders to keep the past back when or commit suicide after a runin with Lady MacBeth.

What batshit crazy are you talkin now...jesus

Its a fairly generic attempt at changing the topic, by the looks of it.

Folks usually resort to them when the topic being discussed isn't going so well.

"Hillary"? I knew someone would find a way to sneak her name into the Thread....

Yeah, its got a distinctly word salad vibe to it, doesn't it?

But given that Trump's legal team has yet to argue in court that fraud every occurred as part of their legal argument......what else are they going to do?

Acknowledge they've been played?

They always delete the term "Fraud" from their filed case....Why? Cause they cannot support the claim and Judges do not look favorably on Lawyers that Lie to them. All these "hearings on fraud" are circuses for the general public. The mean NOTHING!

They've been straight up asked, again and again, if they are moving forward with a fraud allegation. The answer has been a consistent HELL no.

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

Its a HUGE tell.

I hope soon that Rudy will answer "Yes!" I would love to see his bald, dye dripping head, in federal court with his law license in jeopardy. The trump team is trying to convince his cult that he was cheated. But he cannot win in the Court of Public Opinion. He has to win in Real Court Rooms. He has failed over and over.

And....?

I LOVE WATCHING trump LOSE OVER AND OVER AND OVER....SO FULFILLING! Makes my Christmas Merry! How about yours?

With each house seat called for the GOP, it's making mine pretty good.

 

[JimH52]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO
[/QUOTE
The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

Or.....its just a shit legal argument. Judge Brann is a life long republican. And he had this to say of Trump's legal efforts when he dismissed their suit with prejudice:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. "


And Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump himself. It didn't go any better.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Justice denials? --
What is it you don't understand about a high government official filmed making whoopie with his 5 year old kid not wanting his wife of 40 years to see him in such an action or worse. You have no idea what is in an FBI file, do you. Hillary is a Hill critter, and people who know the dark side of her domination of DNC doings do as she orders to keep the past back when or commit suicide after a runin with Lady MacBeth.

What batshit crazy are you talkin now...jesus

Its a fairly generic attempt at changing the topic, by the looks of it.

Folks usually resort to them when the topic being discussed isn't going so well.

"Hillary"? I knew someone would find a way to sneak her name into the Thread....

Yeah, its got a distinctly word salad vibe to it, doesn't it?

But given that Trump's legal team has yet to argue in court that fraud every occurred as part of their legal argument......what else are they going to do?

Acknowledge they've been played?

They always delete the term "Fraud" from their filed case....Why? Cause they cannot support the claim and Judges do not look favorably on Lawyers that Lie to them. All these "hearings on fraud" are circuses for the general public. The mean NOTHING!

They've been straight up asked, again and again, if they are moving forward with a fraud allegation. The answer has been a consistent HELL no.

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

Its a HUGE tell.

I hope soon that Rudy will answer "Yes!" I would love to see his bald, dye dripping head, in federal court with his law license in jeopardy. The trump team is trying to convince his cult that he was cheated. But he cannot win in the Court of Public Opinion. He has to win in Real Court Rooms. He has failed over and over.

Rudy is dealing with worse opponents than street swine who kill people. Rudy zeroed in on defending the U. S. Constitution, and he will win. Get used to it.

You keep thinking that, if it helps you sleep at night.....

 

[JimH52]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO
[/QUOTE
The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

Or.....its just a shit legal argument. Judge Brann is a life long republican. And he had this to say of Trump's legal efforts when he dismissed their suit with prejudice:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. "


And Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump himself. It didn't go any better.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Justice denials? --
What is it you don't understand about a high government official filmed making whoopie with his 5 year old kid not wanting his wife of 40 years to see him in such an action or worse. You have no idea what is in an FBI file, do you. Hillary is a Hill critter, and people who know the dark side of her domination of DNC doings do as she orders to keep the past back when or commit suicide after a runin with Lady MacBeth.

What batshit crazy are you talkin now...jesus

Its a fairly generic attempt at changing the topic, by the looks of it.

Folks usually resort to them when the topic being discussed isn't going so well.

"Hillary"? I knew someone would find a way to sneak her name into the Thread....

Yeah, its got a distinctly word salad vibe to it, doesn't it?

But given that Trump's legal team has yet to argue in court that fraud every occurred as part of their legal argument......what else are they going to do?

Acknowledge they've been played?

They always delete the term "Fraud" from their filed case....Why? Cause they cannot support the claim and Judges do not look favorably on Lawyers that Lie to them. All these "hearings on fraud" are circuses for the general public. The mean NOTHING!

They've been straight up asked, again and again, if they are moving forward with a fraud allegation. The answer has been a consistent HELL no.

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

Its a HUGE tell.

I hope soon that Rudy will answer "Yes!" I would love to see his bald, dye dripping head, in federal court with his law license in jeopardy. The trump team is trying to convince his cult that he was cheated. But he cannot win in the Court of Public Opinion. He has to win in Real Court Rooms. He has failed over and over.

And....?

I LOVE WATCHING trump LOSE OVER AND OVER AND OVER....SO FULFILLING! Makes my Christmas Merry! How about yours?

With each house seat called for the GOP, it's making mine pretty good.

Yup....you gotta have something to smile about. Glad for ya....

 

[beautress]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO

The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

I THINK THIS IS A TOTALLY NEW LIE! CONGRATS!

I peeled the onion. Oh, lookie! The onion heads are squeaking and a-squawking.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO
[/QUOTE
The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

Or.....its just a shit legal argument. Judge Brann is a life long republican. And he had this to say of Trump's legal efforts when he dismissed their suit with prejudice:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. "


And Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump himself. It didn't go any better.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Justice denials? --
What is it you don't understand about a high government official filmed making whoopie with his 5 year old kid not wanting his wife of 40 years to see him in such an action or worse. You have no idea what is in an FBI file, do you. Hillary is a Hill critter, and people who know the dark side of her domination of DNC doings do as she orders to keep the past back when or commit suicide after a runin with Lady MacBeth.

What batshit crazy are you talkin now...jesus

Its a fairly generic attempt at changing the topic, by the looks of it.

Folks usually resort to them when the topic being discussed isn't going so well.

"Hillary"? I knew someone would find a way to sneak her name into the Thread....

Yeah, its got a distinctly word salad vibe to it, doesn't it?

But given that Trump's legal team has yet to argue in court that fraud every occurred as part of their legal argument......what else are they going to do?

Acknowledge they've been played?

They always delete the term "Fraud" from their filed case....Why? Cause they cannot support the claim and Judges do not look favorably on Lawyers that Lie to them. All these "hearings on fraud" are circuses for the general public. The mean NOTHING!

They've been straight up asked, again and again, if they are moving forward with a fraud allegation. The answer has been a consistent HELL no.

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

Its a HUGE tell.

I hope soon that Rudy will answer "Yes!" I would love to see his bald, dye dripping head, in federal court with his law license in jeopardy. The trump team is trying to convince his cult that he was cheated. But he cannot win in the Court of Public Opinion. He has to win in Real Court Rooms. He has failed over and over.

And....?

I LOVE WATCHING trump LOSE OVER AND OVER AND OVER....SO FULFILLING! Makes my Christmas Merry! How about yours?

With each house seat called for the GOP, it's making mine pretty good.

Yup....you gotta have something to smile about. Glad for ya....

That, along with keeping the senate....along with flipping one statehouse and two legislatures......I got lots for Christmas.

Joe Biden will likely make it an extended one for me if he actually tries to govern.

 

[Skylar]

Virtually all the cases that have made it to court and been withdrawn or been dismissed had to do with a couple votes here and a couple votes there. Some were whining that poll watchers couldn't get access (but weren't actual poll watchers.

When judges ask if fraud is being charged...the answer invariably has been ...NO
[/QUOTE
The lower courts in the swing states have Clinton orders. And she has their files that would destroy their families if she doesn't get her commie way.

Or.....its just a shit legal argument. Judge Brann is a life long republican. And he had this to say of Trump's legal efforts when he dismissed their suit with prejudice:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. "


And Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump himself. It didn't go any better.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Justice denials? --
What is it you don't understand about a high government official filmed making whoopie with his 5 year old kid not wanting his wife of 40 years to see him in such an action or worse. You have no idea what is in an FBI file, do you. Hillary is a Hill critter, and people who know the dark side of her domination of DNC doings do as she orders to keep the past back when or commit suicide after a runin with Lady MacBeth.

What batshit crazy are you talkin now...jesus

Its a fairly generic attempt at changing the topic, by the looks of it.

Folks usually resort to them when the topic being discussed isn't going so well.

"Hillary"? I knew someone would find a way to sneak her name into the Thread....

Yeah, its got a distinctly word salad vibe to it, doesn't it?

But given that Trump's legal team has yet to argue in court that fraud every occurred as part of their legal argument......what else are they going to do?

Acknowledge they've been played?

They always delete the term "Fraud" from their filed case....Why? Cause they cannot support the claim and Judges do not look favorably on Lawyers that Lie to them. All these "hearings on fraud" are circuses for the general public. The mean NOTHING!

They've been straight up asked, again and again, if they are moving forward with a fraud allegation. The answer has been a consistent HELL no.

In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.

Its a HUGE tell.

I hope soon that Rudy will answer "Yes!" I would love to see his bald, dye dripping head, in federal court with his law license in jeopardy. The trump team is trying to convince his cult that he was cheated. But he cannot win in the Court of Public Opinion. He has to win in Real Court Rooms. He has failed over and over.

Rudy is dealing with worse opponents than street swine who kill people. Rudy zeroed in on defending the U. S. Constitution, and he will win. Get used to it.

Yeah, his record so far has been spectacularly unimpressive.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote. “Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

And this from a Trump appointee. Life long republican Judge Matthew Brann had even less tolerance for Rudy's shennanigans.

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.

That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state.

Our people, laws, and institutions demand more. At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, I grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss Plaintiffs’ action with prejudice."

That's about as close as a federal judge will come to saying 'Get the fuck out of my courtroom with that bullshit".

 

[Darkwind]

I'm reminded of the 4 years of a, no evidence, endless investigation, of election fraud the left perpetrated upon this nation.

Now suddenly, there is no fraud.

 

[Lesh]

I'm reminded of the 4 years of a, no evidence, endless investigation, of election fraud the left perpetrated upon this nation.

Now suddenly, there is no fraud.

Very few if any were contesting the election results from 2016.

Go away