France's top court:UNCONSTITUTIONAL to levy 75% tax on rich

[bripat9643]

Any American who cares about the county knows that libertarianism is the philosophy for barbarian and one opposed to the principles of classical liberalism.

Classic liberalism and libertarianism are almost indistinguishable, you senile witless git.

Of course, you wouldn't know that because you're a Stalinist.

 

[JakeStarkey]

They are no more commie than bripat is normal. Check all of the information, that of bripat and me, and you will see that he is trying to apply cherry picked WHO statistics as a whole to the agricultural and social context of Cuba in 1958. No, Cuba was not a capitalist workers wonderland, rather it was a hell hole.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Your ruthless hatred of the truth continues.

Libertarianism is the flip side of communism, and both are the road to barbarianism.

Any American who cares about the county knows that libertarianism is the philosophy for barbarian and one opposed to the principles of classical liberalism.

Classic liberalism and libertarianism are almost indistinguishable, you senile witless git.

Of course, you wouldn't know that because you're a Stalinist.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Cuban Health Care

http://www.centerforurbanstudies.co..._evaulation_of_four_decades_of_healthcare.pdf

 

[bripat9643]

They are no more commie than bripat is normal. Check all of the information, that of bripat and me, and you will see that he is trying to apply cherry picked WHO statistics as a whole to the agricultural and social context of Cuba in 1958. No, Cuba was not a capitalist workers wonderland, rather it was a hell hole.

Cuban agricultural workers earned more than agricultural works in France, Germany and England, but Cuba was hell hole?

More proof that you're a witless senile git.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The French, the Germans, and the English earned less than $3 daily? Want to prove it?

Libertarianism: a philosophy of barbarianism and lies.

 

[bripat9643]

Cuban Health Care

http://www.centerforurbanstudies.co..._evaulation_of_four_decades_of_healthcare.pdf

The Center for Urban Studies is an ultra left-wing propaganda mill.

You keep claiming to be a Republican, yet you're always defending communist regimes and posting communist propaganda.

Here is some photographic evidence of the quality of the Cuban healthcare system:

 

[bripat9643]

The French, the Germans, and the English earned less than $3 daily? Want to prove it?

Libertarianism: a philosophy of barbarianism and lies.

Prove any of your propaganda is true, Fakey.

 

[JakeStarkey]

All of the sites are easily reached, the sources can be obtained, and your efforts to minimalize the severity of agricultural Cuba in 1958 has fail.

Do remember Americans overwhelmingly think "fail" when they think of libertarianism, as demonstrated by its lack of getting off the ground since 1992 in a serious way.

The French, the Germans, and the English earned less than $3 daily? Want to prove it?

Libertarianism: a philosophy of barbarianism and lies.

Prove any of your propaganda is true, Fakey.

 

[bripat9643]

All of the sites are easily reached, the sources can be obtained, and your efforts to minimalize the severity of agricultural Cuba in 1958 has fail.

They're propaganda mills, Fakey. The first one you posted shows a few pictures of housing in Cuba today. Do you actually believe a couple of pictures gives a true picture of what housing conditions are like in Cuba? Have you ever heard the term "Potemkin village?" Furthermore, the website is the work of a couple high school teachers. Yeah, now there's a credible source.

The last source you cited from the Center for Urban Studies uses two sources of information, CEE and MINSAP. Both are organs of the Communist government of Cuba. Only a moron or a Commie would accept that document as a credible source.

In short, Fakey, you're either a moron or a commie.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The center is only left wing to a libertarian who think that an Eisenhower Republican was in touch with the commies.

Nothing you post above detracts that socially, economically, and culturally that pre-1958 Cuba left 65% of its population in a terrible situation.

There is nothing that libertarianism, since it is the flip side of communism, would have done to improve the problems.

bripat, Americans don't like libertarianism or communism. They are flip sides of the same coin.

You want to go from one extreme to another: not going to happen.

 

[bripat9643]

The center is only left wing to a libertarian who think that an Eisenhower Republican was in touch with the commies.

Fakey, get in touch with reality: the document you cited from the Center used two sources for all their charts, the CEE and MINSEP. CEE stands for CENTRO EDUCATIVO ESPAÑOL DE LA HABANA. It's an organ of the communist government of Cuba. MINSAP is the Cuban Ministry of Public Health. Does anyone believe that these sources would provide honest information about the state of Cuba's housing or its health system? No. Only a moron or a communist would accept them as credible sources.

Nothing you post above detracts that socially, economically, and culturally that pre-1958 Cuba left 65% of its population in a terrible situation.

For one thing, the agricultural sector comprised only 35% of the population of Cuba in 1958. For another, I've proven beyond all doubt that you are posting communist propaganda.

There is nothing that libertarianism, since it is the flip side of communism, would have done to improve the problems.

That's hilarious coming from a fool who defends the brutal communist regime of Cuba.

 

[bripat9643]

[
He was a ******* thug that took over a mostly unarmed populace. He imported an underclass and even they are leaving in droves when they can.

Go meet some actual Cubans.

You mean the ones who participated in the sell out of their country? And got chased to Florida after the revolution. Those "Cubans" like scumbag Marco "I don't know where I was born" Rubio...

Every time you post you prove you're a Stalinist, Blow Job.

 

[Avatar4321]

OH my God, somewhere a Rich person might be paying his fair share!!!!

We can't have that!

Stealing 75% of what someone earns is paying their fair share?! Show me where you are entitled to another hard working American's income?

Ever hear, "Thou shall not covet?" That means get your hands and greedy eyes off of what others have. Don't like it? Take it up with God himself.

First, I don't believe in your God or your bible. Your "God" is a fraud to keep stupid people like you in line. I'm vastly more evolved.

Second, if you are making seven or eight figures, it's because you are stealing from the people who are doing the actual work. Shit, we give 8 figures to CEO's when their companies need to be bailed out by the government, that gives the government the right to take that money back.

If you are the next stage of evolution, I think Ill pass, my friend.

 

[Avatar4321]

The lowest and dumbest animal in the forest doesn't believe in a God. You are a primate. Hardly evolved, and barely cognizant of your own existence.

The rich are paying their fair share and it is not enough to fund the greed of people who want more.

We can't have that, can we?

35% is the lowest the rich have paid in our history, and our economy has worked better when they pay more.

The top Rate was 93% in the 1950's.. and that was a golden age of America.

Sorry, just because you are scared of death and need to tell yourself a fairy story about a nice man who will make you happy for all eternity, doesn't not make you more evolved than a monkey.

You are just putting more thought into your death fears...

Actually, no. 0% is the lowest the rich (and everyone else) have paid in our history. And considering we managed to sustain our Republic for 130 years without income tax, it doesn't seem logical that 35% isn't enough.

 

[Avatar4321]

btw glad to see France is getting some good sense.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You demonstrate your libertarianism is the equivalent of communist ethics, none.

Are you continuing to say the lifestyle of 35% of middle and upper class Cubans in 1958 was the same as the poor and downtrodden agricultural and urban classes?

The figures are not in question, bripat. They are accepted by the normal and sane. The only question is why you are trying to extend your 35% to all of Cuba, which is completely wrong as well as unethical. In part, your behavior is why libertarianism is so minuscule in effect in America, much as pre-1930 Nazism in Germany. The difference will be that you folks will fall by the wayside.

The center is only left wing to a libertarian who think that an Eisenhower Republican was in touch with the commies.

Fakey, get in touch with reality: the document you cited from the Center used two sources for all their chars, the CEE and MINSEP. CEE stands for CENTRO EDUCATIVO ESPAÑOL DE LA HABANA. It's an organ of the communist government of Cuba. MINSAP is the Cuban Ministry of Public Health. Does anyone believe that these sources would provide honest information about the state of Cuba's housing or its health system? No. Only a moron or a communist would accept them as credible sources.

Nothing you post above detracts that socially, economically, and culturally that pre-1958 Cuba left 65% of its population in a terrible situation.

For one thing, the agricultural sector comprised only 35% of the population of Cuba in 1958. For another, I've proven beyond all doubt that you are posting communist propaganda.

There is nothing that libertarianism, since it is the flip side of communism, would have done to improve the problems.

That's hilarious coming from a fool who defends the brutal communist regime of Cuba.

 

[bripat9643]

Actually, no. 0% is the lowest the rich (and everyone else) have paid in our history. And considering we managed to sustain our Republic for 130 years without income tax, it doesn't seem logical that 35% isn't enough.

The maximum rate during the 1920s was 25%, and we had a huge economic boom. Isn't that amazing?

Blow Job is a classic example showing that most liberal beliefs are based on ignorance of the facts.

 

[bripat9643]

You demonstrate your libertarianism is the equivalent of communist ethics, none.

Are you continuing to say the lifestyle of 35% of middle and upper class Cubans in 1958 was the same as the poor and downtrodden agricultural and urban classes?

The figures are not in question, bripat. They are accepted by the normal and sane. The only question is why you are trying to extend your 35% to all of Cuba, which is completely wrong as well as unethical. In part, your behavior is why libertarianism is so minuscule in effect in America, much as pre-1930 Nazism in Germany. The difference will be that you folks will fall by the wayside.

Fakey, your own source says that only 36.5 % of the population lived in rural areas, not 65%. Furthermore, your sources can all be traced back to propaganda organs of the Communist government of Cuba.

You're spewing Communist propaganda, Fakey. Cubans were better off than many people living in European countries.

You've been sliced, diced and pureed. Give up before you make yourself look like an imbecile.

Whoops! Too late!

 

[JakeStarkey]

bripat has been sliced and diced and put away on the shelf.

Cuba in 1958 among the urban and agricultural poor (65%) of the country was not a nice place, terrible in fact.

Libertarian revisionism is such a waste of time, other than demonstrating the inferior mental abilities of those like bripat and his pack of ferals.