Fox refuses to Air Symposium Ad for Lindell

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
65,087
Reaction score
59,277
Points
3,600
Why? If there was no fraud why can't Lindell advertise that his evidence of fraud will be on display? How will people know how easily it can be debunked? Right? :auiqs.jpg: They won't, because it can't be, and FOX seems to know that. Cowardly, and it will cost them more viewers.

Many believe there was fraud. Whether it is true or not, Americans should be aware that this is going on. It is news and it should be covered. Why are they afraid to air these ads?
 
Last edited:
Why? If there was no fraud why can't Lindell advertise that his evidence of fraud will be on display? How will people know how easily it can be debunked? They won't because it can't be and FOX seems to know that. Cowardly and it will cost them more viewers.
Fox is being sued by dominion. If they continue to support the position they already publicly disavowed trying to avoid being sued. Will give them continued liability.
 
Fox is being sued by dominion. If they continue to support the position they already publicly disavowed trying to avoid being sued. Will give them continued liability.
Publicly disavowed by who? No one believes those assholes, and in a free country with free speech it should not matter, should it?
 
Publicly disavowed by who? No one believes those assholes, and in a free country with free speech it should not matter, should it?

Fox News and Newsmax, facing lawsuits, walk back wild fraud claims about voting-machine companies

On Friday, Fox News began airing a pretaped retraction of many of the claims made in recent weeks on the network. It took the form of an interview with Open Source Election Technology Institute director Eddie Perez and first aired on “Lou Dobbs Tonight.”
 
There is nothing low about free speech. The low comes from denying to air it. The fraud is not going away and actions like this only reinforce the fact that it did happen.

Fox spread a dangerous lie about the 2020 election. Now the network could face expensive consequences.

Dominion Voting sued Fox News for $1.6 billion on March 26 for repeated false claims about election fraud that the network's hosts and ...
 
There is nothing low about free speech. The low comes from denying to air it. The fraud is not going away and actions like this only reinforce the fact that it did happen.

Private media is under no obligation to provide free speech
It only applies to the Government
Congress shall pass no laws….
 
Fox spread a dangerous lie about the 2020 election. Now the network could face expensive consequences.

Dominion Voting sued Fox News for $1.6 billion on March 26 for repeated false claims about election fraud that the network's hosts and ...

Dominion has a solid claim about reporting knowingly false information.
Fox has Deep Pockets and has already rolled back its rhetoric
 
Why don't you try to beat her to it? I have seen nothing but repeated vomit from you.

He's butthurt I calked him an old troll yesterday.

Fox is worthless, Lindell is interesting but going nowhere
 
Private media is under no obligation to provide free speech
It only applies to the Government
Congress shall pass no laws….
The government is immune from libel and slander. A private company speaking libelous words does so at it's own risk of being sued for damages.
 
Publicly disavowed by who? No one believes those assholes, and in a free country with free speech it should not matter, should it?
Positing lies and conspiracy theories on national television will get Fox sued quicker than you can say "boo!".
There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it.
 
The government is immune from libel and slander. A private company speaking libelous words does so at it's own risk of being sued for damages.
The ad says nothing about Dominion. It says he has evidence and says no one can debunk it. Does Dominion have a guilty conscience?
 
Positing lies and conspiracy theories on national television will get Fox sued quicker than you can say "boo!".
There was no fraud. He lost. Deal with it.
It is not a lie and free speech is not spreading anything but a different viable opinion. The American people need to be informed. That is what news outlets are supposed to do. The symposium is a fact, it is going to happen. No conspiracy here, just evidence.

There was all kinds of fraud. To deny it is futile.
 
The ad says nothing about Dominion. It says he has evidence and says no one can debunk it. Does Dominion have a guilty conscience?

Spreading such false information is why Fox was sued for $1.6 billion. As I said before, if they continue to allow such disinformation to be aired on their network, it only reinforces dominions lawsuit against them.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom