Former VP Kamala Harris Has Her SS Protection Revoked

[fncceo]

"What does a DNC contributor look like?!

 

[Jarlaxle]

He just keeps finding new ways to be childish and petty.

And the flock cheers it on, which tells us how childish and petty THEY are.

As usual.

VPs get protection for six months. It's been more than six months. This is a non-story.

 

[Nostra]

What a vile man!

He let her have it for longer than required, Simp.

 

[Nostra]

Her SS coverage was extended a year past the 6 month protocol, by President Biden EO, per her security's request. June of 2026, it was suppose to end.

So? Tater’s EO means squat.

 

[Nostra]

FACT.
View attachment 1156495

Skank.

 

[BackAgain]

So? Tater’s EO means squat.

It wasn’t an EO. It was a mere Presidential Directive. It wasn’t unprecedented. But …

It also went unexplained and unjustified by ex-President Potato.

My sole concern about nullifying Potato’s directive is that, now, if anything were to happen to HeelsUp, Trump would get excoriated.

I have no respect for Kamalalala, but I don’t want to see her killed or maimed or even injured.

Bottom line: it is up to Congress to legislate it if we want former VP’s to get longer periods of Secret Service protection.

 

[Paddlefoot]

It wasn’t an EO. It was a mere Presidential Directive. It wasn’t unprecedented. But …

It also went unexplained and unjustified by ex-President Potato.

My sole concern about nullifying Potato’s directive is that, now, if anything were to happen to HeelsUp, Trump would get excoriated.

I have no respect for Kamalalala, but I don’t want to see her killed or maimed or even injured.

Bottom line: it is up to Congress to legislate it if we want former VP’s to get longer periods of Secret Service protection.

So, she should get better protection than you because of her endorsed defund the police laws.

 

[BackAgain]

So, she should get better protection than you because of her endorsed defund the police laws.

Not something I ever said.

Are you sure it’s my post that you’re responding to?

 

[toobfreak]

"What does a DNC contributor look like?!

I always kind of envisioned them looking more like this:

 

[Care4all]

VPs get protection for six months. It's been more than six months. This is a non-story.

So, Trump wasn't vindictive, petty, and childish to dismiss the extended protection she was given through July of 2026 by a President Biden executive/direct order, eh?

 

[Care4all]

He let her have it for longer than required, Simp.

Actually, her Secret Service protection was through July of 2026, per presidential directive....what Trump has done is spit on that Biden presidential directive, and order the SS to STOP the protection they were ordered to give VP Harris until July of 2026, a year early.

Check your facts!

 

[Care4all]

She's vile alright ... but she's not a man (at least I don't think she is)

View attachment 1156639

Give some examples and let's compare on who is worse!

 

[toobfreak]

So, Trump wasn't vindictive, petty, and childish to dismiss the extended protection she was given through July of 2026 by a President Biden executive/direct order, eh?

It already is July 2026 way out on the other side of the Moon; maybe if Kammy hurries and gets there now, she can still enjoy her last few free days of SS protection at the taxpayers expense.

BTW, how would you feel about cutting Kamala off from being able to buy any sweetened soft-drinks or deserts? Or would that be too harsh too?

 

[Care4all]

Mike Pence lost his Secret Service protection after six months of leaving office, it was not renewed.

Grow up.

Vice president Pence would have gotten an extension if he had asked for it.

VP Dick Cheney after 6 months asked Obama to extend his protection and President Obama did so.

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A PRESIDENT IN OUR HISTORY, to revoke and take away Secret Service protection for a Vice President that was already given them.

Per Executive directive, the secret service was giving the vice president protection through July 2026.

Trump cancelled the protection the VP was given.

 

[toobfreak]

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A PRESIDENT IN OUR HISTORY, to revoke and take away Secret Service protection for a Vice President that was already given them.

Yeah? Well, there has never been a president to get impeached just for checking on the criminal background of a crook before, then impeached again a week before leaving office because a democrat failed to do her job and protect the Capitol, then have his house ransacked while he is out of town taking papers because they implicated the ransackers, then got run up of the four most ridiculous charges in the history of the country:

1. Accused of trying to steal an election just because he called up a state party head and asked him if he was sure he hadn't missed any votes.
2. Accused of a rape that would be 40 years old if true, by a woman with a history of lying, aided by a convicted liar.
3. They tried to steal Trump's businesses, bankrupt him with a 500 million dollar fine and arrested him because a bank willingly loaned Trump some money that he repaid on time with interest, that the bank was delighted with based on an amount his property was worth that the bank agreed with.
4. Accused of trying to rig an election by legally paying off an extortionist who waited until the election to extort him with payments made by his attorney as legal fees that according to the DOJ, was at best a long-expired misdemeanor that no one is ever charged with.

So suck on that.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

So, Trump wasn't vindictive, petty, and childish to dismiss the extended protection she was given through July of 2026 by a President Biden executive/direct order, eh?

Petty is making US taxpayers foot the bill for this drunk whores security detail when the odds are when she dies it’ll be due to chuckling to death on a dick.

 

[Care4all]

It already is July 2026 way out on the other side of the Moon; maybe if Kammy hurries and gets there now, she can still enjoy her last few free days of SS protection at the taxpayers expense.

BTW, how would you feel about cutting Kamala off from being able to buy any sweetened soft-drinks or deserts? Or would that be too harsh too?

It's presently the year 2025, Not July of 2026, when Secret Service was directed to cover her protection through....2026.

 

[Care4all]

Yeah? Well, there has never been a president to get impeached just for checking on the criminal background of a crook before, then impeached again a week before leaving office because a democrat failed to do her job and protect the Capitol, then have his house ransacked while he is out of town taking papers because they implicated the ransackers, then got run up of the four most ridiculous charges in the history of the country:

1. Accused of trying to steal an election just because he called up a state party head and asked him if he was sure he hadn't missed any votes.
2. Accused of a rape that would be 40 years old if true, by a woman with a history of lying, aided by a convicted liar.
3. They tried to steal Trump's businesses, bankrupt him with a 500 million dollar fine and arrested him because a bank willingly loaned Trump some money that he repaid on time with interest, that the bank was delighted with based on an amount his property was worth that the bank agreed with.
4. Accused of trying to rig an election by legally paying off an extortionist who waited until the election to extort him with payments made by his attorney as legal fees that according to the DOJ, was at best a long-expired misdemeanor that no one is ever charged with.

So suck on that.

1. That's a lie, it was much much much more than that....try informing yourself.

2. The accusation and court case was for defamation. Trump was found libel for defamation...Trump lied about her and hurt her through his lies.

3. Trump was cheating under NY Law and got caught cheating...and was found guilty/libel. I always felt the $500 million was too much.
$500 million wouldn't bankrupt him though, he's worth BILLIONS.

4. the misdemeanor was past the statute of limitation, the felony was not past the statute of limitation.
Wrong! The felony he was charged with had been used several times previously, and it was mostly on politicians, just like Trump.

 

[struth]

Actually, her Secret Service protection was through July of 2026, per presidential directive....what Trump has done is spit on that Biden presidential directive, and order the SS to STOP the protection they were ordered to give VP Harris until July of 2026, a year early.

Check your facts!

Correct he’s saving tax dollars.

 

[fncceo]

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A PRESIDENT IN OUR HISTORY, to revoke and take away Secret Service protection for a Vice President that was already given them.

And their still hasn't. Her SS protection period expired.