Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're lying.
FBI Recovered 11 Sets of Classified Documents in Trump Search, Inventory Shows
Some of the documents recovered from the former president’s home were marked top secret and meant to be kept in special facilities, an inventory showed. Trump allies claim he declassified the documents.www.wsj.com
That is about as serious as it gets. I always said when he attended those sex parties in Moscow, he was drugged and hypnotized to be a soviet spy.The Espionage Act has a specific provision that relates to gross negligence of handling of documents.
The full interview has a lot of interesting insights.
“There's a variety of different possible crimes, but I think the two that are probably worth focusing the most on are 18 USC 2071. This really applies to any federal government employee who, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys public records, right? Records that are public records. Another potential crime is actually under the Espionage Act, which is 18 USC 793. And that actually has provisions that apply to essentially the mishandling through gross negligence, permitting documents to be removed from their proper place, or to be lost, stolen, or destroyed. There's also conspiracy provisions within that 18 USC 793. But certainly gross negligence could be proved by willfulness, because that would be even beyond gross negligence.”
One other important point she makes is that the FBI would have good reason to believe evidence is still there.
“It's a very overt step for the FBI to actually execute a search warrant that signals to the whole world that they had probable cause — that a federal judge agreed with — to believe that the evidence of a crime would be located in the premises to be searched at the time it was searched. So it couldn't be, "We thought the stuff was there a year ago, but not now." It would have to be probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime exists in that location at that time. And that means that the Department of Justice, probably at the highest levels, probably all the way up to the attorney general, agreed that this was a step that was not only legally supportable, but also important to take.”
FBI warrant for search of Trump home may involve suspected violations of Espionage Act, former chief of DOJ national security says
The former chief of the Justice Department’s national security division said Tuesday that the FBI warrant for the search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Fla., suggests prosecutors believe they have probable cause that there may have been violations of the World War I-era...www.yahoo.com
and trump is no patriot.Patriots obey the laws.
That is about as serious as it gets. I always said when he attended those sex parties in Moscow, he was drugged and hypnotized to be a soviet spy.
Then you explain why trump does what he does. Supposedly he's not stupid or ignorant has to be a reason.Yeah well, you also think you were at the crucifixion of Christ.
So there's that.
Then you explain why trump does what he does. Supposedly he's not stupid or ignorant has to be a reason.
You believe the beast liar in the world that you don't believe me when I have nothing to gain by having told you my story. I simply wanted to share it. So be it.Yeah well, you also think you were at the crucifixion of Christ.
So there's that.
They opened and went through Trump’s safe. It was a facial recognition lock, but luckily someone had a rotting Jack O' Lantern.
If I stole top secret papers, and she'll have them in my possession, that's where I would keep them. And since they found 11 such papers. The investigation was totally warranted. It definitely qualifies as espionage. A criminal act requiring prison time. Get ready America, trump is finished for good. There's going to be a lot of crying and screaming, but he is now a national threat.They opened and went through Trump’s safe. It was a facial recognition lock, but luckily someone had a rotting Jack O' Lantern.
Patriots obey the laws.
If I stole top secret papers, and she'll have them in my possession, that's where I would keep them. And since they found 11 such papers. The investigation was totally warranted. It definitely qualifies as espionage. A criminal act requiring prison time. Get ready America, trump is finished for good. There's going to be a lot of crying and screaming, but he is now a national threat.
Then you explain why trump does what he does. Supposedly he's not stupid or ignorant has to be a reason.
Depends on the law and circumstances.
The original patriots of this country, the Founders, were patriots for deliberately violating British law.
I am far left and anti-Trump, but I think the FBI totally violated the law on this one.
Ex-presidents not only are the perfect repository for old classified documents, but the ONLY one who can legally do so.
They can't be given to the National Archives because they only take public papers.
Wrong.
A president has total access to all classified documents, and after they become ex-presidents, they still retain the legal right to all the classified documents they had access to when president.
The only thing that would be illegal is if he still was getting recent classified documents created after his term expired.
A president can not lose access rights to documents they had legal access to before, just because they are no longer in office.
You should identify the source as an obama flunkeyThe Espionage Act has a specific provision that relates to gross negligence of handling of documents.
The full interview has a lot of interesting insights.
“There's a variety of different possible crimes, but I think the two that are probably worth focusing the most on are 18 USC 2071. This really applies to any federal government employee who, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys public records, right? Records that are public records. Another potential crime is actually under the Espionage Act, which is 18 USC 793. And that actually has provisions that apply to essentially the mishandling through gross negligence, permitting documents to be removed from their proper place, or to be lost, stolen, or destroyed. There's also conspiracy provisions within that 18 USC 793. But certainly gross negligence could be proved by willfulness, because that would be even beyond gross negligence.”
One other important point she makes is that the FBI would have good reason to believe evidence is still there.
“It's a very overt step for the FBI to actually execute a search warrant that signals to the whole world that they had probable cause — that a federal judge agreed with — to believe that the evidence of a crime would be located in the premises to be searched at the time it was searched. So it couldn't be, "We thought the stuff was there a year ago, but not now." It would have to be probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime exists in that location at that time. And that means that the Department of Justice, probably at the highest levels, probably all the way up to the attorney general, agreed that this was a step that was not only legally supportable, but also important to take.”
FBI warrant for search of Trump home may involve suspected violations of Espionage Act, former chief of DOJ national security says
The former chief of the Justice Department’s national security division said Tuesday that the FBI warrant for the search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Fla., suggests prosecutors believe they have probable cause that there may have been violations of the World War I-era...
The Espionage Act has a specific provision that relates to gross negligence of handling of documents.
The full interview has a lot of interesting insights.
“There's a variety of different possible crimes, but I think the two that are probably worth focusing the most on are 18 USC 2071. This really applies to any federal government employee who, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys public records, right? Records that are public records. Another potential crime is actually under the Espionage Act, which is 18 USC 793. And that actually has provisions that apply to essentially the mishandling through gross negligence, permitting documents to be removed from their proper place, or to be lost, stolen, or destroyed. There's also conspiracy provisions within that 18 USC 793. But certainly gross negligence could be proved by willfulness, because that would be even beyond gross negligence.”
One other important point she makes is that the FBI would have good reason to believe evidence is still there.
“It's a very overt step for the FBI to actually execute a search warrant that signals to the whole world that they had probable cause — that a federal judge agreed with — to believe that the evidence of a crime would be located in the premises to be searched at the time it was searched. So it couldn't be, "We thought the stuff was there a year ago, but not now." It would have to be probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime exists in that location at that time. And that means that the Department of Justice, probably at the highest levels, probably all the way up to the attorney general, agreed that this was a step that was not only legally supportable, but also important to take.”
FBI warrant for search of Trump home may involve suspected violations of Espionage Act, former chief of DOJ national security says
The former chief of the Justice Department’s national security division said Tuesday that the FBI warrant for the search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Fla., suggests prosecutors believe they have probable cause that there may have been violations of the World War I-era...
Wrong.
A president has total access to all classified documents, and after they become ex-presidents, they still retain the legal right to all the classified documents they had access to when president.
The only thing that would be illegal is if he still was getting recent classified documents created after his term expired.
A president can not lose access rights to documents they had legal access to before, just because they are no longer in office.
You should identify the source as an obama flunkey
The president is specialTrump made taking documents to be a felony. Before it was a misdemeanor.
