Former BLM Leaders Speaks Out About "Ugly Truth" About Group

[RetiredGySgt]

So tell me Joe do you agree with the latest statements from the left via black congress critters that blacks in this country are not free and the 4th is just for whites?

Well, are you trying to claim blacks enjoy all the freedoms white do? That would be a bit naïve

I look at the fourth as a promise, that all men are created equal. We aren't there yet.

Yes as a mater of fact everyone has the same rights as everyone else the reason blacks do not succeed in mass is because the democrats for the last 60 years taught the majority to be victims and to be dependent on Government or crime, the majority do not support school or hard work. That is only ******'s fault in the sense that whites run the democratic party.

 

[JoeB131]

Yes as a mater of fact everyone has the same rights as everyone else the reason blacks do not succeed in mass is because the democrats for the last 60 years taught the majority to be victims and to be dependent on Government or crime, the majority do not support school or hard work. That is only ******'s fault in the sense that whites run the democratic party.

Okay, let's look at that one.

Where black people getting the "Good Jobs" before the Civil Rights Movement and Great Society? Well, they did briefly during WWII, but they got displaced from those jobs right after all the White People came back from the war.

The ironic thing is most of the unskilled jobs have been replaced by machines. This has been bad for poor black and poor whites...

Another point I like to make.

The Government spent 2.5 TRILLION on "Middle Class Entitlements" last year. These were payments to mostly white people, such as Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment Insurance, Veterant's benefits and of course disability. (Yes, Welfare Ray, we are looking at you!)

So this idea that somehow, collecting benefits is a moral deficiency is kind of laughable. We spend a lot more keeping white people from becoming poor than we do making black people become middle class.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

JoeB131

Yes as a mater of fact everyone has the same rights as everyone else the reason blacks do not succeed in mass is because the democrats for the last 60 years taught the majority to be victims and to be dependent on Government or crime, the majority do not support school or hard work. That is only ******'s fault in the sense that whites run the democratic party.

Okay, let's look at that one.

Where black people getting the "Good Jobs" before the Civil Rights Movement and Great Society? Well, they did briefly during WWII, but they got displaced from those jobs right after all the White People came back from the war.

The ironic thing is most of the unskilled jobs have been replaced by machines. This has been bad for poor black and poor whites...

Another point I like to make.

The Government spent 2.5 TRILLION on "Middle Class Entitlements" last year. These were payments to mostly white people, such as Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment Insurance, Veterant's benefits and of course disability. (Yes, Welfare Ray, we are looking at you!)

So this idea that somehow, collecting benefits is a moral deficiency is kind of laughable. We spend a lot more keeping white people from becoming poor than we do making black people become middle class.

Nothing you just said disagrees with what I said, Blacks as a group mostly disise school they fail in record numbers or just drop out condemning them to a life of crime poverty and government hand outs. and comparing 13 percent of the population to 70 percent and claiming more of the 70 percent get welfare? well guess what there are 5 times as many whites as blacks. Until you show me stats saying over 5 times as many whites are receiving your welfare hand outs you got nothing and if more whites then blacks get social security that would be because more whites per capita compared to blacks actually work the required number of years to qualify.

 

[JoeB131]

Nothing you just said disagrees with what I said, Blacks as a group mostly disise school they fail in record numbers or just drop out condemning them to a life of crime poverty and government hand outs. and comparing 13 percent of the population to 70 percent and claiming more of the 70 percent get welfare? well guess what there are 5 times as many whites as blacks. Until you show me stats saying over 5 times as many whites are receiving your welfare hand outs you got nothing and if more whites then blacks get social security that would be because more whites per capita compared to blacks actually work the required number of years to qualify.

Disise school? Well, it was clear you were paying attention.

Actually, the majority of people who get welfare are white, and yes, some blacks get "entitlements"... you miss the point entirely. You can't denounce one group getting government handouts and then grab them with both hands yourself.

How often do you visit the VA hospital?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Nothing you just said disagrees with what I said, Blacks as a group mostly disise school they fail in record numbers or just drop out condemning them to a life of crime poverty and government hand outs. and comparing 13 percent of the population to 70 percent and claiming more of the 70 percent get welfare? well guess what there are 5 times as many whites as blacks. Until you show me stats saying over 5 times as many whites are receiving your welfare hand outs you got nothing and if more whites then blacks get social security that would be because more whites per capita compared to blacks actually work the required number of years to qualify.

Disise school? Well, it was clear you were paying attention.

Actually, the majority of people who get welfare are white, and yes, some blacks get "entitlements"... you miss the point entirely. You can't denounce one group getting government handouts and then grab them with both hands yourself.

How often do you visit the VA hospital?

Hey moron I earned the right to the VA hospital by serving honorably in the US military. Further I earned my Social Security benefits by paying into the system as prescribed by law. as for my typo only the waek key on those and by doing so they admit their position is weak.

I still don't hear you denying that the majority of blacks do not support school and education.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nothing you just said disagrees with what I said, Blacks as a group mostly disise school they fail in record numbers or just drop out condemning them to a life of crime poverty and government hand outs. and comparing 13 percent of the population to 70 percent and claiming more of the 70 percent get welfare? well guess what there are 5 times as many whites as blacks. Until you show me stats saying over 5 times as many whites are receiving your welfare hand outs you got nothing and if more whites then blacks get social security that would be because more whites per capita compared to blacks actually work the required number of years to qualify.

The left loves to lie though. They will use total population when they think it makes their case, and per capita when they think it makes their case. By now most everybody here realizes that OCD Joe is a self-hating anti-Semite white with severe mental disorders that he won't get treated. Like typical leftists do, he wants to believe everybody is as stupid as he is.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Well, are you trying to claim blacks enjoy all the freedoms white do? That would be a bit naïve

I look at the fourth as a promise, that all men are created equal. We aren't there yet.

All men are created equal, but that doesn't mean we will all live equal lives or have an equal outcome. The Communists goal is to try and make sure we do by slowly inserting Socialism into our government. If the left meets their goal, that will be the end of the country as our founders designed, and we will be just yet another Socialist shithole.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The Republicans have actually gotten less of a percentage of the vote than they did in the past. Your racism is turning people off, not on.

Bush, who was actually kind of reasonable... got 51% of the vote. You guys haven't topped 47% since you embraced the racists.

The only people that embraced racism is the racists who voted for a President that said things like:

They want to put y'all back in chains.
You're not black unless you voted for me.
I don't want to send my kids to school in a racial jungle.
Poor kids can be just as bright as white kids.
You have to speak Indian to run a 7-11.

This is on top of the fact he openly stated the best people we worked with in the Senate years ago were the segregationists of the Democrat party.

The Democrat party fully supported this dementia patient, and obviously so did Democrat voters in record numbers. So if you want to talk about who is embracing racists, look no further than the party you support.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

No, this is what happens when one party cares more about foreigners than they do Americans. The smart people already realized this years ago and switched over to the Republican party.

The Republicans have actually gotten less of a percentage of the vote than they did in the past. Your racism is turning people off, not on.

Bush, who was actually kind of reasonable... got 51% of the vote. You guys haven't topped 47% since you embraced the racists.

I don't believe I've ever expressed my thoughts to you about gays or Mexicans so I'm chalking this one up as a classic schoolyard taunt. And I'm an atheist you moron.

You throw in with the nuts, you get tarred as one of them.

As I said, a schoolyard taunt.

You're never going to accept any example I give you, no matter how valid.

Because you don't have any valid ones. If the best you can come up with is a smirky little punk wearing a Nazi hat, who went whining people were mean to him, then you don't have much of a case.

Exactly what I'm talking about.

I'm not going to bother citing examples for you for a number of reasons.

1.) You're a known liar. You lied about almost every aspect of the Sandmann incident, the Michael Brown shooting and the death of George Floyd. Or you were too lazy to bother learning all the facts which amounts to the same thing.

2.) For you, it's "guilty until proven innocent" when it comes to racism. It's a perfect approach for you people because it is literally and logically impossible to prove someone is not racist; you can't prove a negative. If they deny it, simply cite "White privilege", "White denial" or "White fragility" and it's done. Guilty as charged.

3.) You are incapable of objectivity where these types of things are concerned. In almost every discussion of this type, you have devised derogatory nicknames for the villains so you never have to refer to them by their actual names (Sandmann is Smirky McBitchslap, Gena Carano is Mannish Woman, etc.). To do so would make them real people to you and you can't let that get in the way of your Salem Witch Trials. After all, there are blacks and wokesters here at U.S. Message Board to impress.

This is a non sequitur and irrelevant. Your having been a Republican once is immaterial to my opinion about your moral character. You're not a lying douchebag because you're Democrat or even a Liberal, you're a lying douchebag because you're a lying douchebag.

Sorry, man, I'm a dispenser of ugly truths... more truth than your side can handle, that's the thing.

Irrelevant. It is still immaterial and I still think you're a lying douchebag.

The fact I could see how the GOP was going over the cliff and got off tells you that I can self-evaluate.

You can't evaluate shit. You had virtually everything wrong about the Sandmann, Brown and Floyd cases:

* You thought Sandmann's group was assembled at the memorial without a permit when they were actually just waiting for their bus.
* You thought Sandmann approached Phillips when it was the other way around.
* You thought the Covington kids were taunting Phillips' group when it was the Black Hebrew Israelites.
* You ignored the fact that Phillips lied when he said he was trying to get to the memorial when he clearly and deliberately approached the Covington group to bang his drum in Sandmann's face.

* You ignored the fact that Brown assaulted Wilson in his cruiser and tried to take his gun.
* You thought Wilson confronted Brown at random to harass him when Wilson confronted them for walking in the middle of the street and then saw the cigars in Brown's hand which tipped him off to the possibility that Brown was the suspect in the police call about someone stealing cigars from the store.

* You thought Floyd was not driving his own vehicle while hopped up on fentanyl when the photos and video clearly showed he was in the driver's seat when officers confronted him.

No, you can't evaluate shit.

 

[JoeB131]

Hey moron I earned the right to the VA hospital by serving honorably in the US military. Further I earned my Social Security benefits by paying into the system as prescribed by law. as for my typo only the waek key on those and by doing so they admit their position is weak.

I still don't hear you denying that the majority of blacks do not support school and education.

Well, it was so stupid and racist a statement that I wasn't going to embarrass you by repeating it. Seriously, how did you get to the rank of E-7 being such a flaming racist?

I think you make my point to "entitlements". We all think we are "entitled" to government benefits... someone else is paying for. What was that about the problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money?

 

[JoeB131]

Exactly what I'm talking about.

I'm not going to bother citing examples for you for a number of reasons.

1.) You're a known liar. You lied about almost every aspect of the Sandmann incident, the Michael Brown shooting and the death of George Floyd. Or you were too lazy to bother learning all the facts which amounts to the same thing.

No, guy, we know what the facts are about these police murders. It's only the Brutality Apologists who claim they are something other than what they are.

2.) For you, it's "guilty until proven innocent" when it comes to racism. It's a perfect approach for you people because it is literally and logically impossible to prove someone is not racist; you can't prove a negative. If they deny it, simply cite "White privilege", "White denial" or "White fragility" and it's done. Guilty as charged.

White privilege is a thing. Sorry, it just is. Anyone who denies it has an issue. I'll admit, I know that I've gotten jobs a bunch of times over people of color merely by being white. I've also lost out on opportunities due to AA, but on balance, it's still a huge advantage to be white in this society.

the fact you are in denial about it, and get very "fragile" is kind of telling. I'm not even sure why you think it is, unless you feel that admitting it takes away from whatever you think you've accomplished in your life.

I'm nearly 60. I could name dozens of times just being white gave me huge advantages, as a student, while I was in the service, in the private sector. Now there are two ways to approach this. Be in complete denial and get all offended when anyone points it out... or realize the inequities exist and work to correct them.

3.) You are incapable of objectivity where these types of things are concerned. In almost every discussion of this type, you have devised derogatory nicknames for the villains so you never have to refer to them by their actual names (Sandmann is Smirky McBitchslap, Gena Carano is Mannish Woman, etc.). To do so would make them real people to you and you can't let that get in the way of your Salem Witch Trials. After all, there are blacks and wokesters here at U.S. Message Board to impress.

Naw, man, I think those names are just funny. Seriously Carano is kind of Mannish. Her claim to fame was beating up other Mannish women until she decided to use her limited acting skills, and though that she could upend a 4 Billion dollar investment.

And if I had disrespected a veteran as a teen, my old man would have slapped my ass into a new zip code.

You can't evaluate shit. You had virtually everything wrong about the Sandmann, Brown and Floyd cases:

* You thought Sandmann's group

Was a bunch of little entitled Catholic Bastards? Yes, they are.

* You ignored the fact that Brown assaulted Wilson in his cruiser and tried to take his gun.

Completely irrelevent. He was 150 feet away from the cruiser with his hands up when he was fatally shot.

"YOu really pissed me off" is not a good motive to murder someone.

Here's the good news. The days of cops getting away with that shit is over. DA's aren't going to be able to abuse the Grand Jury process to exonerate them.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Exactly what I'm talking about.

I'm not going to bother citing examples for you for a number of reasons.

1.) You're a known liar. You lied about almost every aspect of the Sandmann incident, the Michael Brown shooting and the death of George Floyd. Or you were too lazy to bother learning all the facts which amounts to the same thing.

No, guy, we know what the facts are about these police murders. It's only the Brutality Apologists who claim they are something other than what they are.

Yes, guy, you had almost every pertinent detail about those incidents wrong or you lied or you deliberately ignored them.

2.) For you, it's "guilty until proven innocent" when it comes to racism. It's a perfect approach for you people because it is literally and logically impossible to prove someone is not racist; you can't prove a negative. If they deny it, simply cite "White privilege", "White denial" or "White fragility" and it's done. Guilty as charged.

White privilege is a thing. Sorry, it just is. Anyone who denies it has an issue. I'll admit, I know that I've gotten jobs a bunch of times over people of color merely by being white. I've also lost out on opportunities due to AA, but on balance, it's still a huge advantage to be white in this society.

As I said, it's a perfect approach.

the fact you are in denial about it, and get very "fragile" is kind of telling.

I didn't say white privilege, white fragility or white denial didn't exist dumbass, I said you race baiting assholes fall back on them every time. It's the crutch you use when you really don't have a sound reason for a racism accusation. It's cheap, it's easy, it covers all the bases so you don't have to actually think and consider other possibilities. But the real beauty part is that it doesn't do a ******* thing as far as determining guilt or innocence.

I'm not even sure why you think it is, unless you feel that admitting it takes away from whatever you think you've accomplished in your life.

I'm nearly 60. I could name dozens of times just being white gave me huge advantages, as a student, while I was in the service, in the private sector. Now there are two ways to approach this. Be in complete denial and get all offended when anyone points it out... or realize the inequities exist and work to correct them.

I really don't give a shit. As for myself, I've never been hired over a black or minority person. Where I grew up there were virtually no blacks. We were poor and had to get by with little and if anyone was being favored in some way over us, it was other whites.

3.) You are incapable of objectivity where these types of things are concerned. In almost every discussion of this type, you have devised derogatory nicknames for the villains so you never have to refer to them by their actual names (Sandmann is Smirky McBitchslap, Gena Carano is Mannish Woman, etc.). To do so would make them real people to you and you can't let that get in the way of your Salem Witch Trials. After all, there are blacks and wokesters here at U.S. Message Board to impress.

Naw, man, I think those names are just funny. Seriously Carano is kind of Mannish. Her claim to fame was beating up other Mannish women until she decided to use her limited acting skills, and though that she could upend a 4 Billion dollar investment.

Like I said, you can't use their real names.

And if I had disrespected a veteran as a teen, my old man would have slapped my ass into a new zip code.

Maybe he should have anyway, considering what a craven liar you turned out to be.

You can't evaluate shit. You had virtually everything wrong about the Sandmann, Brown and Floyd cases:

* You thought Sandmann's group

Was a bunch of little entitled Catholic Bastards? Yes, they are.

Nice try. You were still wrong about their reason for being at the memorial. Calling them Catholic bastards for the hundredth time is not going to make me forget. You spewed that false shit, now lick it up.

* You ignored the fact that Brown assaulted Wilson in his cruiser and tried to take his gun.

Completely irrelevent. He was 150 feet away from the cruiser with his hands up when he was fatally shot.

You ignored it. You completely ignored the fact that that, more than anything, is what got Brown shot.

"YOu really pissed me off" is not a good motive to murder someone.

Here's the good news. The days of cops getting away with that shit is over. DA's aren't going to be able to abuse the Grand Jury process to exonerate them.

No doubt you are creaming in your Pampers over it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I think you make my point to "entitlements". We all think we are "entitled" to government benefits... someone else is paying for. What was that about the problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money?

Everybody is entitled thanks to you and yours. The difference is those who paid into those entitlements and those who haven't. When you spend a lifetime in the military for the crummy pay they give, of course you are entitled to the benefits you were promised. It's part of the deal no different than getting paid holidays at a job, six weeks vacation, medical coverage, profit sharing or personal days off in the private sector.

As long as you agreed to work for those benefits, of course you are entitled to them because you and the provider both agreed to them. If you had no say whether you wanted to participate in funding those entitlements, you'd be an idiot to not collect on them since you were forced into the program.

 

[JoeB131]

Yes, guy, you had almost every pertinent detail about those incidents wrong or you lied or you deliberately ignored them.

Naw, I just ignored the right Wing spin that made awful people seem good... Chauvin and Wilson are racist bullies and Smirky was an entitled little punk.

As I said, it's a perfect approach.

I didn't say white privilege, white fragility or white denial didn't exist dumbass, I said you race baiting assholes fall back on them every time. It's the crutch you use when you really don't have a sound reason for a racism accusation. It's cheap, it's easy, it covers all the bases so you don't have to actually think and consider other possibilities. But the real beauty part is that it doesn't do a ******* thing as far as determining guilt or innocence.

Well, you see, that's the thing. We've seen white fragility express itself ever since you guys have a huge freakout when Obama got elected, that eventually led to Trump. Not even the first time I've seen this, since something kind of similar happened in the White Neighborhoods of Chicago when Harold Washington got elected. Doesn't matter that Obama and Washington did really, really good jobs, the freakout was kind of amazing to watch.

I really don't give a shit. As for myself, I've never been hired over a black or minority person. Where I grew up there were virtually no blacks. We were poor and had to get by with little and if anyone was being favored in some way over us, it was other whites.

Sure you were, buddy. Sure you were.

Like I said, you can't use their real names.

I could, but the nicknames are MUCH funnier.

Nice try. You were still wrong about their reason for being at the memorial. Calling them Catholic bastards for the hundredth time is not going to make me forget. You spewed that false shit, now lick it up.

They were there because they were little religious fanatics who wanted to give globs of meat more rights than the women they are inside. Then they started harassing people of color they ran into with their Nazi Hats. I don't entirely blame these kids, they had been brainwashed by their church for 12 years and unleashed on the world. Shit, it took me years to overcome some of the Catholic brainwashing on that issue.

You ignored it. You completely ignored the fact that that, more than anything, is what got Brown shot.

Except it shouldn't have. If he had been shot while he was reaching into the car, we wouldn't have an issue.

He was shot when he was 150 feet away, lost both of his shoes, had turned around and put his hands up, and Wilson, who let's not forget had been fired from another police department for corruption, plugged him six more times because he was pissed.

And a Racist DA used a Grand Jury to cover it up.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Yes, guy, you had almost every pertinent detail about those incidents wrong or you lied or you deliberately ignored them.

Naw, I just ignored the right Wing spin that made awful people seem good... Chauvin and Wilson are racist bullies and Smirky was an entitled little punk.

**** right wing or left wing spin, you still had many of the FACTUAL details wrong.

As I said, it's a perfect approach.

I didn't say white privilege, white fragility or white denial didn't exist dumbass, I said you race baiting assholes fall back on them every time. It's the crutch you use when you really don't have a sound reason for a racism accusation. It's cheap, it's easy, it covers all the bases so you don't have to actually think and consider other possibilities. But the real beauty part is that it doesn't do a ******* thing as far as determining guilt or innocence.

Well, you see, that's the thing. We've seen white fragility express itself ever since you guys have a huge freakout when Obama got elected, that eventually led to Trump. Not even the first time I've seen this, since something kind of similar happened in the White Neighborhoods of Chicago when Harold Washington got elected. Doesn't matter that Obama and Washington did really, really good jobs, the freakout was kind of amazing to watch.

Irrelevant. None of this is proof that every time someone is called a racist that it is true.

I really don't give a shit. As for myself, I've never been hired over a black or minority person. Where I grew up there were virtually no blacks. We were poor and had to get by with little and if anyone was being favored in some way over us, it was other whites.

Sure you were, buddy. Sure you were.

Are you saying that I'm lying?

Like I said, you can't use their real names.

I could, but the nicknames are MUCH funnier.

Sometimes they are. Not yours though. Yours are neither funny nor clever. But to slap a demeaning nickname on every person you dislike or hate hints at underlying psychological or emotional issues. You have a lot of hate and anger in you.

Nice try. You were still wrong about their reason for being at the memorial. Calling them Catholic bastards for the hundredth time is not going to make me forget. You spewed that false shit, now lick it up.

They were there because they were little religious fanatics who wanted to give globs of meat more rights than the women they are inside. Then they started harassing people of color they ran into with their Nazi Hats. I don't entirely blame these kids, they had been brainwashed by their church for 12 years and unleashed on the world. Shit, it took me years to overcome some of the Catholic brainwashing on that issue.

Wrong and irrelevant. When we discussed this the first time a couple of years ago, you didn't even know they were there for the March For Life rally and you thought they were assembling and demonstrating at the memorial without a permit - you probably thought it was a small Trump rally when you saw the hat. In fact, you didn't even know that the MFL rally had been in a different location and that they were at the memorial waiting for their bus.

You ignored it. You completely ignored the fact that that, more than anything, is what got Brown shot.

Except it shouldn't have. If he had been shot while he was reaching into the car, we wouldn't have an issue.

He WAS shot while reaching in the car you ******* idiot. He was shot in the hand, remember?

He was shot when he was 150 feet away, lost both of his shoes, had turned around and put his hands up, and Wilson, who let's not forget had been fired from another police department for corruption, plugged him six more times because he was pissed.

And a Racist DA used a Grand Jury to cover it up.

Sorry, but the forensic evidence proves he was advancing on Wilson.

 

[JoeB131]

uck right wing or left wing spin, you still had many of the FACTUAL details wrong.

No, I didn't. Minor details just weren't that important to the bigger issues. Hey, buddy, guess what, A jury sent Chauvin to Jail for 22 years.... case closed.

Irrelevant. None of this is proof that every time someone is called a racist that it is true.

Except they always turn out to be racists, don't they?

Are you saying that I'm lying?

You are so deluded with right wing lies you wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in the ass.

Sometimes they are. Not yours though. Yours are neither funny nor clever. But to slap a demeaning nickname on every person you dislike or hate hints at underlying psychological or emotional issues. You have a lot of hate and anger in you.

Naw, man, it just shows you don't have a sense of humor.

Wrong and irrelevant. When we discussed this the first time a couple of years ago, you didn't even know they were there for the March For Life rally and you thought they were assembling and demonstrating at the memorial without a permit - you probably thought it was a small Trump rally when you saw the hat. In fact, you didn't even know that the MFL rally had been in a different location and that they were at the memorial waiting for their bus.

Actually, I didn't care they were a bunch of misogynist little shits trying to enslave women, as if that made it any better.

He WAS shot while reaching in the car you ******* idiot. He was shot in the hand, remember?

Right. Then he ran away. He got 150 feet away from Wilson, turned around, put his hands up, and Wilson shot him six more times.

Sorry, but the forensic evidence proves he was advancing on Wilson.

No, it just proves he was facing Wilson. 16 witnesses said he had his hands up.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

uck right wing or left wing spin, you still had many of the FACTUAL details wrong.

No, I didn't. Minor details just weren't that important to the bigger issues. Hey, buddy, guess what, A jury sent Chauvin to Jail for 22 years.... case closed.

Irrelevant. None of this is proof that every time someone is called a racist that it is true.

Except they always turn out to be racists, don't they?

Are you saying that I'm lying?

You are so deluded with right wing lies you wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in the ass.

Sometimes they are. Not yours though. Yours are neither funny nor clever. But to slap a demeaning nickname on every person you dislike or hate hints at underlying psychological or emotional issues. You have a lot of hate and anger in you.

Naw, man, it just shows you don't have a sense of humor.

Wrong and irrelevant. When we discussed this the first time a couple of years ago, you didn't even know they were there for the March For Life rally and you thought they were assembling and demonstrating at the memorial without a permit - you probably thought it was a small Trump rally when you saw the hat. In fact, you didn't even know that the MFL rally had been in a different location and that they were at the memorial waiting for their bus.

Actually, I didn't care they were a bunch of misogynist little shits trying to enslave women, as if that made it any better.

He WAS shot while reaching in the car you ******* idiot. He was shot in the hand, remember?

Right. Then he ran away. He got 150 feet away from Wilson, turned around, put his hands up, and Wilson shot him six more times.

Sorry, but the forensic evidence proves he was advancing on Wilson.

No, it just proves he was facing Wilson. 16 witnesses said he had his hands up.

LOL 16 ehh, then explain id=f it was so cut and dry and why the feds found that the cop was Justified? Found that AFTER trying to railroad him?

 

[JoeB131]

LOL 16 ehh, then explain id=f it was so cut and dry and why the feds found that the cop was Justified? Found that AFTER trying to railroad him?

Actually, the Feds don't have a lot of leeway in intervening in local cases, that's the problem.

Once the disgraced ex-DA covered it up, there really wasn't a lot the feds could do at that point.

All that said, the days of cops getting passes from corrupt DA's is over. They like getting re-elected too much.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Right. Then he ran away. He got 150 feet away from Wilson, turned around, put his hands up, and Wilson shot him six more times.

No, it just proves he was facing Wilson. 16 witnesses said he had his hands up.

Which was proven repeatedly to be lies promoted by your puppet masters in the MSM.

The problem is, all of the racially tinged accusations against Officer Wilson were likely false, according to the final analysis by President Obama’s Department of Justice. The report, issued in 2015, found that Officer Wilson’s accounts were corroborated. He’d acted in self-defense. Brown, the report said, had reached into the police vehicle and grabbed Officer Wilson by the neck. And Brown appeared to be lunging toward Officer Wilson when Officer Wilson shot him in self-defense.

The Obama Justice Department investigators concluded that original witness accounts claiming that Brown’s hands were up when he was shot, and other key claims, were “unreliable” and — in many instances — directly contradicted by the forensic evidence, while Officer Wilson’s story was supported by the forensics. “Hands up, don’t shoot,” the Obama Justice Department found, was contrary to reliable accounts — and likely fabricated.

The findings of this important report got nowhere near the news coverage of the original false claims. There were no apologies to Officer Wilson. His career and life were ruined by the false claims.

Time to retire Ferguson narrative

Michael Brown’s death, based on the findings of the Obama Justice Department, isn’t an example of bad policing run amok or racism.

thehill.com

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Ya Joe wont believe facts his lies are so much better