I disagree. I believe Right and Wrong were imprinted on the human soul before birth and we choose whether or not to accept them. They havenāt changed since caveman days.
I see the options differently:
1. The incumbent, whose morals, values and ideology I disagree with on every level.
2. A candidate who spent 4 years in his previous Presidency getting little to nothing accomplished because his own party hates him, and would likely do the same to him again.
3. A laundry list of third party candidates who may not even end up on the ballot and have no chance of winning.
4. Write in my own name (yes Iām qualified, Constitutionally).
5. Detective and ignore the entire mudfight.
Not a great set of choices.
Whatever. If you think Trump got nothing accomplished in his four years, I don't know what to tell you. Being that misinformed is difficult to overcome.
The best economy that any of us have ever seen without any inflation to speak of with the poor and middle class benefitting the most.
The most liberties any of us had ever seen in a long time.
The closest thing to world peace any of us had ever known with no new wars, saber rattling stopped, four Arab Nations made peace/trade treaties with Israel.
The most benefit to previously oppressed demographics that anybody had ever seen.
The border under control better than it had ever been for a long time.
And all that with a hostile press and a mostly hostile Congress. Think what he could get accomplished with a supportive Congress.
Here's a pretty good list for just his first two years:
www.presidency.ucsb.edu
You think option #1, Biden, has a pleasant personality? Look at how he snaps at and scolds people. Or mocks them.
I know. But he is generally more likable to more people than Trump. Especially before he became so mentally challenged.
But then apparently so was Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, Fidel Castro, Hussein et al.
Those who vote for personality over results are a problem and will very often do their country a great disservice.
