...for me, I cannot, nor will not.....put J6 behind. It is key.

[BackAgain]

We’ve never seen anything like what happened in the 2020 election. Certainly never in modern history.

It wasn’t just a riot. There was a concerted effort by Trump and MAGA to overturn the election results through lies and fraud.

You may not see it, but that’s not unexpected. MAGA has a way of distorting reality.

You making a claim isn’t proof of your claim.

And you usually fail to support your claims.

Your own distortions of reality are massive. But at least you’re a flaming hypocrite.

 

[Marener]

You making a claim isn’t proof of your claim.

And you usually fail to support your claims.

Your own distortions of reality are massive. But at least you’re a flaming hypocrite.

If you don’t know by now, it’s by choice.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

Substantiated.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Clinging to a media created, liberal fueled, mirage for support

Stupid babbling. As he said, he watched it live, on TV.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You making a claim isn’t proof of your claim.

And you usually fail to support your claims.

Your own distortions of reality are massive. But at least you’re a flaming hypocrite.

Haha, internet trolling isn't going to make it go away.

 

[Rambunctious]

Some people committed acts of violence and vandalism.

Hundreds of people were rounded up by police who did nothing wrong. Their arrests were illegal and many of them sued.

Says MSNBC.....

 

[BlindBoo]

She helped raise money for them. So they could go out and do more damage and ruin people's livelihoods.

She tweeted support for bail for protesters who were unjustly arrested.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I am surprised and disappointed that J6 has not been more intensely focused on by first, the Biden campaign; and then the Harris campaign. They have given Don Trump a pass.

Donald Trump initiated J6, summoned the mob, angered and provoked the mob, and then directed them to illegally march down Pennsylvania Avenue to the Capitol where they could attack our elected Representatives and stop the peaceful transfer of power. That was the plan of Don Trump and his enablers and sycophants.

I believe all of that.
THAT...is what happened. And consequences must be levied.
Levied against more than the nincompoop losers who beat the hell out of uniformed cops.

So, I was delighted to see today's treatment by the Associated Press on just what is taking place in all those trials of the violent MAGA losers.

I haven't read all of the AP's reportage today....but will.
In the meantime, what I have read confirms what I saw on the telly with my own eyes on J6.

For those who are interested here in the link below is the AP's in-depth reportage of what is and has been revealed via video and witness testimony. It is graphic. It is determinative. It is condemning.
And critically, it has been near unfailingly persuasive to juries and judges who have been exposed to it.

There are no "political prisoners" here. There are no 'falsely accused'. No 'wrongly convicted'.

Harris must not let America forget who instigated and authored that violent seditious event. Must not let America forget that the Commander in Chief du jour, sat on his fat butt doing nothing but watching for over 3hours and watched hard-working employees of the government he claimed he led.....have the crap beat out of them by his supporters.

Kamala Harris must tattoo January 6th onto that fat butt so no one forgets and everybody will want those consequences.

No disrespect intended.

Jan. 6 can’t be denied in federal court

Inside the courtroom, judges and jurors silently absorb chilling sights and sounds from television screens. Outside, it's a starkly different story.

apnews.com

.....................................................................................

"Inside Washington’s federal courthouse, there’s no denying the reality of Jan. 6, 2021. Day after day, judges and jurors silently absorb the chilling sights and sounds from television screens of rioters beating police, shattering windows and hunting for lawmakers as democracy lay under siege.
But as he seeks to reclaim the White House, Donald Trump continues to portray the defendants as patriots worthy of admiration, an assertion that has been undercut by the adjudicated truth in hundreds of criminal cases where judges and juries have reached the opposite conclusion about what history will remember as one of America’s darkest days.
The cases have systematically put on record — through testimony, documents and video — the crimes committed, weapons wielded, and lives altered by physical and emotional damage. Trump is espousing a starkly different story, portraying the rioters as hostages and political prisoners whom he says he might pardon if he wins in November."








0 of 30 secondsVolume 90%
















00:01
00:30

Nobody cares

 

[Rambunctious]

She tweeted support for bail for protesters who were unjustly arrested.

How does she know what they did in a riot?... come on man...

 

[Marener]

Says MSNBC.....

Says prosecutors who dropped charges because they couldn’t be sustained.

 

[Rambunctious]

Says prosecutors who dropped charges because they couldn’t be sustained.

Says MSNBC....

 

[BackAgain]

If you don’t know by now, it’s by choice.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

Substantiated.

No. It’s still bullshit. As are most things you post.

 

[Marener]

No. It’s still bullshit. As are most things you post.

Okay dude. If you say so.

 

[BackAgain]

Haha, internet trolling isn't going to make it go away.

Your trolling is endless but never of any significance.

 

[BackAgain]

Okay dude. If you say so.

Whether I say it or not, in fact.

You are a shitty posting member here and lack any iota of credibility.

Now, back ON topic:

You just cited to a mere indictment as evidence for your contention that something is “substantiated.”

It would be difficult for you to top that on the gibberish scale.

 

[Marener]

Whether I say it or not, in fact.

You are a shitty posting member here and lack any iota of credibility.

Now, back ON topic:

You just cited to a mere indictment as evidence for your contention that something is “substantiated.”

It would be difficult for you to top that on the gibberish scale.

You make claims but don't support them. Pretending like an indictment isn't relevant evidence to support an allegation is weak. Just sticking your fingers in your ears is pathetic.

 

[BackAgain]

You make claims but don't support them.

No. That’s you. As I just pointed out.

Pretending like an indictment isn't relevant evidence to support an allegation is weak.

No. It’s correct. You’re just too fully ignorant to grasp that an indictment isn’t proof of any allegation in it. That fact is so crystal clear that juries even get legally charged on it by judges during trials.

What Is Not Evidence

https://www.nycourts.gov/judges/cji/1-General/CJI2d.Indictment_Not_Evid.pdf

Just sticking your fingers in your ears is pathetic.

Your lack of knowledge and your willingness to verbally vomit all over the board despite your abundant ignorance is what is truly pathetic.

 

[Marener]

No. That’s you. As I just pointed out.


No. It’s correct. You’re just too fully ignorant to grasp that an indictment isn’t proof of any allegation in it. That fact is so crystal clear that juries even get legally charged on it by judges during trials.

What Is Not Evidence

https://www.nycourts.gov/judges/cji/1-General/CJI2d.Indictment_Not_Evid.pdf

Your lack of knowledge and your willingness to verbally vomit all over the board despite your abundant ignorance is what is truly pathetic.

You said I don't support my allegations. The indictment supports it.

This isn't a trial. You're not on a jury.

I just thought maybe you could think for yourself for a change instead of hiding from facts and evidence.

 

[BackAgain]

You said I don't support my allegations. The indictment supports it.

No. It sure doesn’t. It supports nothing and g the sort. An indictment is just a written set of allegations. Claims do not support claims. You dipshit.

This isn't a trial. You're not on a jury.

I know. But the principle is exactly the same. If I say you’re an odious scumbag idiot and you challenge me to support that claim, even a moron like you would recognize it as lacking in support to cite to someone else who has said the same about you.

I just thought maybe you could think for yourself for a change instead of hiding from facts and evidence.

I just think that you should cite actual support and evidence not mere allegations if you wish to support one of your many asshole contentions.

But, you’re free to continue being a deluded assclown. You’re good at it.

 

[Marener]

No. It sure doesn’t. It supports nothing and g the sort. An indictment is just a written set of allegations. Claims do not support claims. You dipshit.

This indictment is more than just a set of allegations because it includes facts, testimony and documentation that support those allegations. None of which you can or will address.

All you’re doing is creating a structure that makes it impossible to say almost anything about almost anything. It’s lazy and pathetic. All you do is throw stones and run.

 

[BackAgain]

This indictment is more than just a set of allegations because it includes facts, testimony and documentation that support those allegations. None of which you can or will address.

Wrong.

All you’re doing is creating a structure that makes it impossible to say almost anything about almost anything. It’s lazy and pathetic. All you do is throw stones and run.

You simply can’t admit that even the courts themselves instruct juries contrary to your bogus claim.

You’ve got nothing. This explains why you stupidly and ignorantly seek to use mere allegations as evidence of your contention.

You’re really to stupid to breather.