For Every Democrat Who Used The Word "Insurrection"....

[Correll]

I think you deal with criminals by dealing with criminals.

Not by harassing people who are doing nothing wrong.

Fact is that going after Martin did nothing to deal with any crime. It just added conflict.

You are arguing against a straw man. I’ve not said don’t try to deal with crime. I’ve said that a person who isn’t doing anything wrong shouldn’t be subject to your investigation.

Are you sure Martin was doing nothing wrong? He reacted quite strongly to a fairly minor provocation.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

How many of the hundreds arrested have been charge with insurrection? 200? 100? 50? 20? 10? 5? 1? Seems to me they would all be charged or at least one person, is that the case?

@Papageorgio wrote: How many of the hundreds arrested have been charged with insurrection? 21NOV19-POST#297

NFBW wrote: Here are 15 of the Oath Keepers who have been indicted for conspiracy to stop, delay, and hinder the Certification of the Electoral College vote so there wouid be no transfer of power from the Trump Administration to the certified winner - Joe Biden. 21NOV19-POST#298

2020, through January 6, 2021, in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, the defendants, THOMAS CALDWELL, DONOVAN CROWL, JESSICA WATKINS, SANDRA PARKER, BENNIE PARKER, GRAYDON YOUNG, LAURA STEELE, KELLY MEGGS, CONNIE MEGGS, KENNETH HARRELSON, ROBERTO MINUTA, JOSHUA JAMES, JOSEPH HACKETT, JASON DOLAN, and WILLIAM ISAACS, did knowingly combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with each other and others known and unknown, to commit an offense against the United States, namely, to corruptly obstruct, influence, and impede an official proceeding, that is, the Certification of the Electoral College vote, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1512(c)(2)

https://context-cdn.washingtonpost..../ebc31ab9-738b-42c5-8a2b-086b0ae568d1.#page=1
Purpose of the Conspiracy

33. The purpose of the conspiracy was to stop, delay, and hinder the Certification of the Electoral College vote

NFBW; Do you still think Jan6 was a peaceful protest that turned violent but is no big deal?

END2210201822

 

[JGalt]

NFBW; Do you still think Jan6 was a peaceful protest that turned violent but is no big deal?

END2210201822

It was no big deal. The election was stolen. Trump won.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

It was no big deal. The election was stolen. Trump won.

NFBW: Of course it is no big deal to Americans who no longer believe the only way to win an election is to get more votes than your opponent.

Declaring your loser won the election with no evidence presented to a court of law to sort out the facts and then condoning violence that was incited by the loser of the 2020 presidential election to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power to the actual winner is a step forward for fascism and and end to American democracy as we have known it.

END2210202029

 

[miketx]

NFBW: Of course it is no big deal to Americans who no longer believe the only way to win an election is to get more votes than your opponent.

Declaring your loser won the election with no evidence presented to a court of law to sort out the facts and then condoning violence that was incited by the loser of the 2020 presidential election to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power to the actual winner is a step forward for fascism and and end to American democracy as we have known it.

END2210202029

Liar, there was plenty of evidence. Hopefully you'll be incarcerated.

 

[Chillicothe]

"The election was stolen. Trump won."

Whew!! THAT would be a revelation to the U.S. and to the world.......
.....if poster JGalt will back up his assertions with credible verifiable proof.

Yeah, JGalt, that is a hint.
Meaning, just do it.
Show us that you got some salt in ya, mein freund.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Liar, there was plenty of evidence.

NFBW: Where is the evidence. Name one court case where Trump lawyers brought evidence and won the case proving that Trump won any one of the seven states that Trump ck tested?

END2210202049

 

[miketx]

NFBW: Where is the evidence. Name one court case where Trump lawyers brought evidence and won the case proving that Trump won any one of the seven states that Trump ck tested?

END2210202049

I guess you forgot the courts refused to hear the case, LIAR!

 

[beautress]

How many of the hundreds arrested have been charge with insurrection? 200? 100? 50? 20? 10? 5? 1? Seems to me they would all be charged or at least one person, is that the case?

840 Arrests were made of the alleged riots of Jan 6, 2021. Jan. 6 Capitol Rioters Arrests and Sentences So Far

 

[Lesh]

I guess you forgot the courts refused to hear the case, LIAR!

Because it lacked merit

 

[whutTHEYsay]

guess you forgot the courts refused to hear the case, LIAR!

NFBW: Trump’s lawyers brought sixty two cases - 61 were losses due to lack of merit or as Rudy told the judge - this is not a fraud case because Rudy could not lie to a judge:

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.​

​

Judge cancels fraud evidence hearing after Rudy Giuliani admits "this is not a fraud case" in court

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from President Donald Trump's personal attorney

www.salon.com

​

Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to take place on Thursday.​

​

"The evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for Thursday, November 19, 2020 is CANCELLED," the judge wrote in his order, which also denied a motion by Trump attorney Linda Kerns to sanction opposing counsel for a supposedly "threatening" phone call.​

​

As Law and Crime News reporter Adam Klasfeld notes, Judge Brann telegraphed this move in court on Tuesday when he said that he didn't see the need to hold an evidentiary hearing based on the claims being made by the Trump campaign.​

​

"Context: Rudy Giuliani admitted in court yesterday, 'This is not a fraud case,'" writes Klasfeld in explaining why the judge saw no need to hold a hearing on fraud evidence when Giuliani said that the case didn't actually involve fraud allegations.​

​

END2210202226​

 

[miketx]

NFBW: Trump’s lawyers brought sixty two cases - 61 were losses due to lack of merit or as Rudy told the judge - this is not a fraud case because Rudy could not lie to a judge:

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani.​

​

Judge cancels fraud evidence hearing after Rudy Giuliani admits "this is not a fraud case" in court

A federal judge based in Pennsylvania has heard enough from President Donald Trump's personal attorney

www.salon.com

​

Judge Matthew Brann of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Wednesday announced (PDF) that he was formally canceling an evidentiary hearing that had been scheduled to take place on Thursday.​

​

"The evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for Thursday, November 19, 2020 is CANCELLED," the judge wrote in his order, which also denied a motion by Trump attorney Linda Kerns to sanction opposing counsel for a supposedly "threatening" phone call.​

​

As Law and Crime News reporter Adam Klasfeld notes, Judge Brann telegraphed this move in court on Tuesday when he said that he didn't see the need to hold an evidentiary hearing based on the claims being made by the Trump campaign.​

​

"Context: Rudy Giuliani admitted in court yesterday, 'This is not a fraud case,'" writes Klasfeld in explaining why the judge saw no need to hold a hearing on fraud evidence when Giuliani said that the case didn't actually involve fraud allegations.​

​

END2210202226​

Liar.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Liar.

Provide specifics.

 

[miketx]

Provide specifics.

Classic.

 

[Supposn]

How many of the hundreds arrested have been charge with insurrection? 200? 100? 50? 20? 10? 5? 1? Seems to me they would all be charged or at least one person, is that the case?

On March 2, 2022, Oath Keeper Joshua James pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy, admitting in his plea that "from November 2020 through January 2021, he conspired with other Oath Keeper members and affiliates to use force to prevent, hinder and delay the execution of the laws of the United States governing

On June 6, 2022, five members of the Proud Boys —their leader Enrique Tarrio, together with Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, Ethan Nordean, and Dominic Pezzola—were indicted for seditious conspiracy.
Respectfully, Supposn

 

[Lesh]

On March 2, 2022, Oath Keeper Joshua James pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy, admitting in his plea that "from November 2020 through January 2021, he conspired with other Oath Keeper members and affiliates to use force to prevent, hinder and delay the execution of the laws of the United States governing

On June 6, 2022, five members of the Proud Boys —their leader Enrique Tarrio, together with Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, Ethan Nordean, and Dominic Pezzola—were indicted for seditious conspiracy.
Respectfully, Supposn

Yup

That

 

[Papageorgio]

On March 2, 2022, Oath Keeper Joshua James pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy, admitting in his plea that "from November 2020 through January 2021, he conspired with other Oath Keeper members and affiliates to use force to prevent, hinder and delay the execution of the laws of the United States governing

On June 6, 2022, five members of the Proud Boys —their leader Enrique Tarrio, together with Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, Ethan Nordean, and Dominic Pezzola—were indicted for seditious conspiracy.
Respectfully, Supposn

I said that almost a year ago and you are finally picking it up. I was correct when I posted that.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

18 days, bitches.

 

[Mac1958]

NFBW: Trump’s lawyers brought sixty two cases - 61 were losses due to lack of merit or as Rudy told the judge - this is not a fraud case because Rudy could not lie to a judge:

​

Whew!! THAT would be a revelation to the U.S. and to the world.......

Because it lacked merit

The Trumpsters are FAR more accurately informed than those who disagree with them, such as Trump's Justice Department, Trump's DHS, Trump's Attorney General, Trump's Supreme Court, Trump-appointed judges, Trump's White House staff, Trump's White House lawyers, Trump's campaign manager, Trump cybersecurity officials, several Republican lawmakers, Republican state and local election officials, state Supreme Courts and Republican State Attorneys General, and the GQP's very own handpicked Cyber Ninjas.

They are fully, 100% conned, 100% emotionally invested, and they will never admit reality, no matter what.

 

[Supposn]

I said that almost a year ago and you are finally picking it up. I was correct when I posted that.

Papageorgio, you're incorrect. Any federal charges and/or indictments and/or convictions based in part upon a mob's seditious attack upon the Capital Building were legal acknowledgment that the January 6, 2021 mob was a seditious mob.

The wheels of justice often run slow, and too often not sufficiently fine. But in these cases they're operating. When you posted your thread, the adjective “seditious” was then entirely justified. Respectfully Supposn.