Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What for?Very nice drawing, got any links to back up daniel wultz claim?
for truth, i know that word maybe alien to you
Why does Sponge Bob Fanger Pants have a hissy fit every time it's beloved Palestinian terrorists are exposed for what they are?for truth, i know that word maybe alien to you
Why don't you find a link? You know, to disprove the claim.
How did that work out for them?Why does Sponge Bob Fanger Pants have a hissy fit every time it's beloved Palestinian terrorists are exposed for what they are?for truth, i know that word maybe alien to you
Why don't you find a link? You know, to disprove the claim.
U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case
U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the Bank of China may be found liable for supporting terrorism in a case brought by the family of a U.S. citizen killed in a 2006 suicide bombing in Israel.
The unusual 118-page ruling came as Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a request by attorneys for the state-controlled bank, one of China's largest, to have it dropped from the case.
Victims of overseas terrorist attacks are increasingly turning to U.S. courts for restitution. Many are pursuing claims not only against shadowy groups or rogue nations but also against financial institutions with substantial economic interests to defend.
Specifically, the lawsuit claims that in an April 2005 meeting, counterterrorism officials with Israel's prime minister's office demanded that China's central bank and Ministry of Public Security stop the Bank of China from assisting Shurafa, but China "demurred."
In weighing whether the claims against the bank can go forward, Lamberth wrote: "The Court must assume the truth of this allegation, which is plausible because it is reasonable to assume that, although BOC is not directly owned by China . . . China does exert a measure of control over the BOC through China's central bank, the People's Bank of China."
Nine-year landmark fight which riled geopolitics between Israel, China, US ends with a whimper.President Trump certainly knows how to do that.
China's being softened up big time. Go for the camel's hiding head.
Brought to you by a fake news site. Ha ha ha. Funny shit!How did that work out for them?Why does Sponge Bob Fanger Pants have a hissy fit every time it's beloved Palestinian terrorists are exposed for what they are?for truth, i know that word maybe alien to you
Why don't you find a link? You know, to disprove the claim.
U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case
U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the Bank of China may be found liable for supporting terrorism in a case brought by the family of a U.S. citizen killed in a 2006 suicide bombing in Israel.
The unusual 118-page ruling came as Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a request by attorneys for the state-controlled bank, one of China's largest, to have it dropped from the case.
Victims of overseas terrorist attacks are increasingly turning to U.S. courts for restitution. Many are pursuing claims not only against shadowy groups or rogue nations but also against financial institutions with substantial economic interests to defend.
Specifically, the lawsuit claims that in an April 2005 meeting, counterterrorism officials with Israel's prime minister's office demanded that China's central bank and Ministry of Public Security stop the Bank of China from assisting Shurafa, but China "demurred."
In weighing whether the claims against the bank can go forward, Lamberth wrote: "The Court must assume the truth of this allegation, which is plausible because it is reasonable to assume that, although BOC is not directly owned by China . . . China does exert a measure of control over the BOC through China's central bank, the People's Bank of China."
American victims of Palestinian terrorism are suing a Chinese bank. Israel is trying to stop them.
The Disastrous Consequences of a Lawsuit by a Terror Victim's Parents
You are able to distinguish are you not, the difference between identifying a path for funding Palistinian terrorism through a Palestinian piece of shit abusing a bank in China, and whether or not a lawsuit for damages for said criminal behavior occurring across three countries, can bring about justice in monetary damages, given all the diplomatic hurdles involved. Or maybe you're just yet another antisemitic imbecile, pissing in the Internet winds.Nine-year landmark fight which riled geopolitics between Israel, China, US ends with a whimper.President Trump certainly knows how to do that.
China's being softened up big time. Go for the camel's hiding head.
Exclusive: Historic case against Bank of China for millions in terror financing dismissed
That was two years ago
Ropey and jewland want war, but as always they want others to do the wet workYada, yada.
Avenues closed. No one expects convictions. Even with Hillary.
War takes time. Buildup takes time. This will be a revisited thread. The right person is in it.
No, not me.