Weren't your ilk saying that the judge was going to throw the plea deal out and release Flynn?
'My ilk'? Generalize much, snowflake?
Sullivan appropriately hammered Mueller's team and demanded they release the information. After they did, the fact that the FBI and Mueller had no video evidence, no audio evidence, no notes, no transcripts, and a bunch of almost completely blacked out documents and a 302 written 7 months after Flynn's interview was enough to catch Sullivan's eye. I think he, like any objective, moral, ethical judge out there would have been prepared to toss the case out.
The fact that Flynn refused to change his plea and the almost certainty that there has to be more to what we have seen / has been reported changed that.
As I said, the fact that Flynn refused to change his plea does not take away from the FACTS that during this investigation it has been exposed that:
- The FBI went 'rogue', deviating from proper protocol and procedure in the handling of both sides of the investigation
- With both Hillary (to find her innocent) and Flynn (to indict him) the FBI did not video or audio tape the interviews, did not take good notes, & did not provide transcripts.
- In Flynn's case they did not write up a 302 for 7 months.
- In Hillary's case they failed to put her under oath
- In Flynn's case, they told him no lawyer was needed and his Miranda rights were violated (they did not tell him answering questions could be used against him legally...which is enough legal grounds to toss his entire interview).
- Comey testified his FBI agents reported Flynn never lied.
- The US IG reported the FBI was caught altering witness testimony after it was given AND that the FBI biasedly refused to indict Abedin and Mills for the same crime
If we EVER get another US AG that's worth a damn, before all of this gest swept underneath the proverbial rug the DOJ, FBI, and Mueller and his team should be held accountable, things change.