Florist Sued for Refusing Service to Gay Couple Pens Defiant Letter Rejecting Gov’t Settlement Offer

[Flash]

If gays want their own flowers, they should buy seeds, plant them and grow them.

If gays want a picture taken, they can get their own camera and a freaking selfie stick.

If gays want cakes or cupcakes, Betty Crocker would most certainly love their business.

But then they wouldn't be able to punish those people that don't accept their lifestyle.

 

[bodecea]

My understanding of history leads me to believe that whenever the state steps in to tell people what they *must* do in regards to religious practices, imprisonment and bloodshed is not far behind.

We see just on this board how many are ready and willing for that step.

Ah yes...a Holy War....have at it. Maybe you'll get as many participants as "American Spring".

 

[Katzndogz]

My understanding of history leads me to believe that whenever the state steps in to tell people what they *must* do in regards to religious practices, imprisonment and bloodshed is not far behind.

We see just on this board how many are ready and willing for that step.

Ah yes...a Holy War....have at it. Maybe you'll get as many participants as "American Spring".

Maybe more like the Ukraine.

 

[koshergrl]

Conservatives are obsessed with restoring the right to discriminate.

Dude, it's floral arrangements.

We fight over flowers now?

It's flowers. It's a cake. It's some pictures.

What it really is, is an organized program to force people to violate their most deeply held values. Then liberals can say that hypocritical Christians sell out their values for a profit.

Selling cake doesn't 'violate' anything. If you don't believe in same sex marriage, don't enter into one. That might violate your beliefs.

This isn't about selling cake. It's about forcing Christians to endorse practices they believe are sacrilegious, or face fines, imprisonment and who knows what else.

It's not exactly endorsing practices they consider sacreligious. It's performing acts themselves that are sacreligious.

As businesses, however, they endorse them by way of their participation.

 

[Katzndogz]

Dude, it's floral arrangements.

We fight over flowers now?

It's flowers. It's a cake. It's some pictures.

What it really is, is an organized program to force people to violate their most deeply held values. Then liberals can say that hypocritical Christians sell out their values for a profit.

Selling cake doesn't 'violate' anything. If you don't believe in same sex marriage, don't enter into one. That might violate your beliefs.

This isn't about selling cake. It's about forcing Christians to endorse practices they believe are sacrilegious, or face fines, imprisonment and who knows what else.

It's not exactly endorsing practices they consider sacreligious. It's performing acts themselves that are sacreligious.

As businesses, however, they endorse them by way of their participation.

By their participation they are committing an independent sin of their own.

 

[koshergrl]

It's flowers. It's a cake. It's some pictures.

What it really is, is an organized program to force people to violate their most deeply held values. Then liberals can say that hypocritical Christians sell out their values for a profit.

Selling cake doesn't 'violate' anything. If you don't believe in same sex marriage, don't enter into one. That might violate your beliefs.

This isn't about selling cake. It's about forcing Christians to endorse practices they believe are sacrilegious, or face fines, imprisonment and who knows what else.

It's not exactly endorsing practices they consider sacreligious. It's performing acts themselves that are sacreligious.

As businesses, however, they endorse them by way of their participation.

By their participation they are committing an independent sin of their own.

Well according to the left wing fascists, they just have to suck it up, because according to the homo lobby, marriage isn't a sacrament anyway...

 

[bodecea]

Would you allow human sacrifice if people claimed it was one of their religious practices?

The pertinent question here is would you FORCE people to do human sacrafice if it was the law and they objected to it morally?

Because forcing people to do human sacrifice is JUST LIKE asking a florist to sell flowers for a wedding.

 

[koshergrl]

Would you allow human sacrifice if people claimed it was one of their religious practices?

The pertinent question here is would you FORCE people to do human sacrafice if it was the law and they objected to it morally?

Or even animal sacrifice.

If it was LEGAL, would a Christian baker be FORCED to cater a Satanic ritual?

 

[bodecea]

Selling cake doesn't 'violate' anything. If you don't believe in same sex marriage, don't enter into one. That might violate your beliefs.

This isn't about selling cake. It's about forcing Christians to endorse practices they believe are sacrilegious, or face fines, imprisonment and who knows what else.

It's not exactly endorsing practices they consider sacreligious. It's performing acts themselves that are sacreligious.

As businesses, however, they endorse them by way of their participation.

By their participation they are committing an independent sin of their own.

Well according to the left wing fascists, they just have to suck it up, because according to the homo lobby, marriage isn't a sacrament anyway...

I understand, from your posting history, that it's now ok for christians to bear false witness.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Would you allow human sacrifice if people claimed it was one of their religious practices?

The pertinent question here is would you FORCE people to do human sacrafice if it was the law and they objected to it morally?

ROFLMNAO! This is the SECOND thread TONIGHT that I have witnessed the Left hauling out HUMAN SACRIFICE as a means to show that 'homosexuality is legitimate'.

I wonder if she's also in the 'Democrats are getting Desperate' thread?

 

[Katzndogz]

Would you allow human sacrifice if people claimed it was one of their religious practices?

The pertinent question here is would you FORCE people to do human sacrafice if it was the law and they objected to it morally?

Because forcing people to do human sacrifice is JUST LIKE asking a florist to sell flowers for a wedding.

Now you are starting to understand. Not selling flowers but creating the arrangement. May as well require the Christian to sharpen the knives.

 

[bodecea]

Would you allow human sacrifice if people claimed it was one of their religious practices?

The pertinent question here is would you FORCE people to do human sacrafice if it was the law and they objected to it morally?

ROFLMNAO! This is the SECOND thread TONIGHT that I have witnessed the Left hauling out HUMAN SACRIFICE as a means to show that 'homosexuality is legitimate'.

I wonder if she's also in the 'Democrats are getting Desperate' thread?

Because we all know that homosexuality is JUST LIKE Human Sacrifice, eh?

 

[Skylar]

It's flowers. It's a cake. It's some pictures.

What it really is, is an organized program to force people to violate their most deeply held values. Then liberals can say that hypocritical Christians sell out their values for a profit.

Selling cake doesn't 'violate' anything. If you don't believe in same sex marriage, don't enter into one. That might violate your beliefs.

This isn't about selling cake. It's about forcing Christians to endorse practices they believe are sacrilegious, or face fines, imprisonment and who knows what else.

It's not exactly endorsing practices they consider sacreligious. It's performing acts themselves that are sacreligious.

As businesses, however, they endorse them by way of their participation.

By their participation they are committing an independent sin of their own.

If they can't do their job without sinning, then perhaps they would be happier in another profession.

 

[Katzndogz]

Would you allow human sacrifice if people claimed it was one of their religious practices?

The pertinent question here is would you FORCE people to do human sacrafice if it was the law and they objected to it morally?

ROFLMNAO! This is the SECOND thread TONIGHT that I have witnessed the Left hauling out HUMAN SACRIFICE as a means to show that 'homosexuality is legitimate'.

I wonder if she's also in the 'Democrats are getting Desperate' thread?

The left doesn't understand the difference between performing an act and not performing the act.

 

[koshergrl]

Selling cake doesn't 'violate' anything. If you don't believe in same sex marriage, don't enter into one. That might violate your beliefs.

This isn't about selling cake. It's about forcing Christians to endorse practices they believe are sacrilegious, or face fines, imprisonment and who knows what else.

It's not exactly endorsing practices they consider sacreligious. It's performing acts themselves that are sacreligious.

As businesses, however, they endorse them by way of their participation.

By their participation they are committing an independent sin of their own.

If they can't do their job without sinning, then perhaps they would be happier in another profession.

Totally irrelevant (not to mention it's a logical fallacy).

The state does not have the authority in this country to force people to participate in rituals that they view as sacrilegious.

Get queer florists and leave the Christians alone. We aren't your slaves.

 

[Katzndogz]

Selling cake doesn't 'violate' anything. If you don't believe in same sex marriage, don't enter into one. That might violate your beliefs.

This isn't about selling cake. It's about forcing Christians to endorse practices they believe are sacrilegious, or face fines, imprisonment and who knows what else.

It's not exactly endorsing practices they consider sacreligious. It's performing acts themselves that are sacreligious.

As businesses, however, they endorse them by way of their participation.

By their participation they are committing an independent sin of their own.

If they can't do their job without sinning, then perhaps they would be happier in another profession.

They can absolutely do their job without sinning. Just let them.

 

[deltex1]

Segregationists and slave owners felt the same way.

They were just following the bible.

How about the Crusaders...don't forget them...

 

[koshergrl]

B-b-b-but...

THE CRUSADERS!

 

[Seawytch]

Would you allow human sacrifice if people claimed it was one of their religious practices?

The pertinent question here is would you FORCE people to do human sacrafice if it was the law and they objected to it morally?

Because forcing people to do human sacrifice is JUST LIKE asking a florist to sell flowers for a wedding.

And the point the "Christians" are arguing us that it's their deeply held beliefs that should not be infringed upon. Why do Christian beliefs trump Satanists?

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Stop feeding the bottom feeders.
The O/P is baiting you with the cheapest can of worms from a bait shack on the side of the road somewhere in the bowels of Georgia or .....Alabama...or some other redneck state. Let it go.

Googled it: Washington state. Must be the east side. No one in Seattle or Tacoma is that stupid.

Addendum: Who the **** cares? Let this woman with the stupid name of Barronnellla do her thing.

The O/P is an attention hound who needs to find something more useful to fill her unlimited empty hours.