Florist Sued for Refusing Service to Gay Couple Pens Defiant Letter Rejecting Gov’t Settlement Offer

[Asclepias]

Bigotry = bigotry, even if the sign says STRAIGHTS ONLY instead of WHITES ONLY.

Same bullshit, different decade.

Behavior is not an inherent attribute Jake.

Does the owner of a Jewish deli have to serve skin heads who repeatedly scream "**** you ****?"

Why or why not?

Because they are causing a commotion in the deli idiot.

 

[Syriusly]

So homosexuality isn't hereditary. Didn't think so.

Glad you convinced yourself. It must have been a struggle.

Never saw any evidence to the contrary. This is the first time in our history that a group gets state protections due to their lifestyles.

Under Washington State law prohibit discrimination by business's based upon the following:

• Race
• Honorably discharged veteran or military status
• Color
• HIV, AIDS, and Hepatitis C status
• National Origin
• Pregnancy or maternity
• Sex • Sexual orientation or gender identity
• Creed
• Use of a guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability
• Disability

None of them are based upon behavior

I said lifestyles, you saw behaviors. But I guess you're trying to spin it to where homosexuals aren't interested in sex? lol

Okay- show me which is a 'lifestyle' any more than another- and how you come to that conclusion?

Under Washington State law prohibit discrimination by business's based upon the following:

• Race
• Honorably discharged veteran or military status
• Color
• HIV, AIDS, and Hepatitis C status
• National Origin
• Pregnancy or maternity
• Sex • Sexual orientation or gender identity
• Creed
• Use of a guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability
• Disability

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I can tell people are gay even though they dont announce it. You must be a ******* idiot.

Sure you can Asslips.

Behavior is not skin color.

Washington State law has nothing to do with behavior

Under Washington State law prohibit discrimination by business's based upon the following:

• Race
• Honorably discharged veteran or military status
• Color
• HIV, AIDS, and Hepatitis C status
• National Origin
• Pregnancy or maternity
• Sex • Sexual orientation or gender identity
• Creed
• Use of a guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability
• Disability

None of them are based upon behavior- no matter how much you filthy bigots try to make it so.

HEY! What have our lessons taught us about Bigotry?

That the person using the term, projecting it against another... is BY DEFINITION: A Bigot.

'Sexual Orientation' is a behavior. Creed: Behavior. Military Service: Behavior Use of Guide Dog: BEHAVIOR, Disability: Behavior. The HIV, a consequence of Sexual orientation, thus BEHAVIOR.

All of the protected classes are BEHAVIORAL... EXCEPT "RACE".

 

[Asclepias]

Who said behavior is a skin color? I said I can tell when people are gay.

You say lots of shit - most of it just isn't true.

Is that your best retort to the fact I exposed your deflection?

 

[Iceweasel]

So homosexuality isn't hereditary. Didn't think so.

Glad you convinced yourself. It must have been a struggle.

Never saw any evidence to the contrary. This is the first time in our history that a group gets state protections due to their lifestyles.

Under Washington State law prohibit discrimination by business's based upon the following:

• Race
• Honorably discharged veteran or military status
• Color
• HIV, AIDS, and Hepatitis C status
• National Origin
• Pregnancy or maternity
• Sex • Sexual orientation or gender identity
• Creed
• Use of a guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability
• Disability

None of them are based upon behavior

I said lifestyles, you saw behaviors. But I guess you're trying to spin it to where homosexuals aren't interested in sex? lol

Okay- show me which is a 'lifestyle' any more than another- and how you come to that conclusion?

Under Washington State law prohibit discrimination by business's based upon the following:

• Race
• Honorably discharged veteran or military status
• Color
• HIV, AIDS, and Hepatitis C status
• National Origin
• Pregnancy or maternity
• Sex • Sexual orientation or gender identity
• Creed
• Use of a guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability
• Disability

Someone needs to take you back to kindergarden and start you over. Homosexuality is a lifestyle like heterosexuality and bisexuality. No wonder you're confused!

 

[g5000]

For the other mentally challenged, if White Nationalists went into a Jewish deli and ordered the deli special, the Jewish owner would have to serve them.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and ordered a ham sandwich, and ham sandwiches were not on the menu, the WNs would have to pound sand.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and started screaming obscenities, they can be forcibly removed for disturbing the peace.

We now return you to the STRAIGHTS ONLY florist and bakery.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Were the gay couple conducting themselves in a disorderly fashion?

Clearly they were conducting themselves in a way that is at odds with the religious convictions of the owner.

Look, you oppose civil liberty and believe that business owners are your property to direct as you please, but you are not the owner of the business in question, so it is not your decision.

Will you ever figure out a way to make a relevant analogy?

These and other questions are revealing much about your mental abilities.

Again, you are at war to end civil liberty, ergo you are unswayed by logic and reason.

 

[Uncensored2008]

For the other mentally challenged, if White Nationalists went into a Jewish deli and ordered the deli special, the Jewish owner would have to serve them.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and ordered a ham sandwich, and ham sandwiches were not on the menu, the WNs would have to pound sand.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and started screaming obscenities, they can be forcibly removed for disturbing the peace.

We now return you the STRAIGHTS ONLY florist and bakery.

Bullshit.

The owner of the Jewish Deli could and would eject white nationalists.

 

[Asclepias]

Glad you convinced yourself. It must have been a struggle.

Never saw any evidence to the contrary. This is the first time in our history that a group gets state protections due to their lifestyles.

Under Washington State law prohibit discrimination by business's based upon the following:

• Race
• Honorably discharged veteran or military status
• Color
• HIV, AIDS, and Hepatitis C status
• National Origin
• Pregnancy or maternity
• Sex • Sexual orientation or gender identity
• Creed
• Use of a guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability
• Disability

None of them are based upon behavior

I said lifestyles, you saw behaviors. But I guess you're trying to spin it to where homosexuals aren't interested in sex? lol

Okay- show me which is a 'lifestyle' any more than another- and how you come to that conclusion?

Under Washington State law prohibit discrimination by business's based upon the following:

• Race
• Honorably discharged veteran or military status
• Color
• HIV, AIDS, and Hepatitis C status
• National Origin
• Pregnancy or maternity
• Sex • Sexual orientation or gender identity
• Creed
• Use of a guide dog or service animal by a person with a disability
• Disability

Someone needs to take you back to kindergarden and start you over. Homosexuality is a lifestyle like heterosexuality and bisexuality. No wonder you're confused!

When did you chose to be heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual?

 

[Asclepias]

For the other mentally challenged, if White Nationalists went into a Jewish deli and ordered the deli special, the Jewish owner would have to serve them.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and ordered a ham sandwich, and ham sandwiches were not on the menu, the WNs would have to pound sand.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and started screaming obscenities, they can be forcibly removed for disturbing the peace.

We now return you the STRAIGHTS ONLY florist and bakery.

Bullshit.

The owner of the Jewish Deli could and would eject white nationalists.

He would be within his rights if they were causing a commotion.

 

[g5000]

For the other mentally challenged, if White Nationalists went into a Jewish deli and ordered the deli special, the Jewish owner would have to serve them.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and ordered a ham sandwich, and ham sandwiches were not on the menu, the WNs would have to pound sand.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and started screaming obscenities, they can be forcibly removed for disturbing the peace.

We now return you the STRAIGHTS ONLY florist and bakery.

Bullshit.

The owner of the Jewish Deli could and would eject white nationalists.

If they were there to buy what was on the menu, the owner would be wrong and could be sued if he threw them out.

Something very similar has actually been all the way to the Supreme Court. National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

For the other mentally challenged, if White Nationalists went into a Jewish deli and ordered the deli special, the Jewish owner would have to serve them.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and ordered a ham sandwich, and ham sandwiches were not on the menu, the WNs would have to pound sand.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and started screaming obscenities, they can be forcibly removed for disturbing the peace.

We now return you the STRAIGHTS ONLY florist and bakery.

Bullshit.

The owner of the Jewish Deli could and would eject white nationalists.

He's actually not allowed to, in most cases, nor should he be. It's a business, act like one.

 

[Asclepias]

For the other mentally challenged, if White Nationalists went into a Jewish deli and ordered the deli special, the Jewish owner would have to serve them.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and ordered a ham sandwich, and ham sandwiches were not on the menu, the WNs would have to pound sand.

If WNs went into a Jewish deli and started screaming obscenities, they can be forcibly removed for disturbing the peace.

We now return you the STRAIGHTS ONLY florist and bakery.

Bullshit.

The owner of the Jewish Deli could and would eject white nationalists.

He's actually not allowed to, in most cases, nor should he be. It's a business, act like one.

He would be within his rights if they "started screaming obscenities" as the dummy Censored specified

 

[g5000]

National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie was the inspiration for this scene:

 

[g5000]

He would be within his rights if they "started screaming obscenities" as the dummy Censored specified

Yep. UC likes to phrase a scene one way, and then excise those parts which prove to be inconvenient later.

 

[BlindBoo]

Clearly they were conducting themselves in a way that is at odds with the religious convictions of the owner.

Screaming "**** You" doesn't violate religious convictions but fall into the realm of disturbing the peace.

 

[g5000]

Clearly they were conducting themselves in a way that is at odds with the religious convictions of the owner.

Screaming "**** You" violates doesn't violate religious convictions but fall into the realm of disturbing the peace.

To UC, being gay is the same as a Nazi walking around screaming "**** YOU!"

This is why they need a STRAIGHTS ONLY sign on their store. Wouldn't want gays just walking on in, seeing as they are like Nazis screaming **** you.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I donno, are obnoxious skin heads a protected class?

When we start protecting behavior, all sanity is lost.

I support liberty.

True story: In Anaheim I went into a diner with a sign on the wall which read "we speak only English in this establishment."

Were the owners allowed to say that? Would the democrats be breaking windows and burning the place down while dragging the owners off to concentration camps? Probably.

From my perspective it made little sense, why limit potential customers in an area where Spanish speakers are the majority?

But in a free country, one person can sell to another person or not, as they damned well please. If one is so stupid as to exclude customers based on skin color, they won't stay in business long. That's how free people do things, they vote with their wallets.

I fully support civil rights. The owner of a business has every right to put up a sign that says "whites only." I won't buy from that business, which is my ONLY legitimate way of showing my disapproval. But democrats oppose civil rights - you dictate who others may engage in business with. This violates every principle of liberty.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Screaming "**** You" doesn't violate religious convictions but fall into the realm of disturbing the peace.

It isn't up to you or the party bosses to define the religious convictions of others.

 

[g5000]

I fully support civil rights. The owner of a business has every right to put up a sign that says "whites only."

Then it follows you believe an owner should be allowed to have a STRAIGHTS ONLY store, with the necessary sign.

Same bullshit, different decade.