A gay couple's desire to force a Christian florist to service their wedding should not take precedence over the Christian florist's constitutional rights of freedom of religion, freedom of association, and private property.
Where in the world do gays get off thinking they have some kind of "right" to force religious business people to service their ceremonies against their will? Just because you're religious and you happen to own a business does not mean you surrender your fundamental constitutional rights.
And I ask again, What happened to the repeated promise that "if you're not gay, gay marriage won't affect you"?
Suing Christian florists, bakers, photographers, etc., because they don't want to service gay weddings is hateful bigotry and thoroughly un-American. But, of course, gays and their allies couldn't care less