Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis To Sign Bill Banning Social Media ‘Deplatforming’

[colfax_m]

But if they are going to use the platform funded by taxpayers, then they can't deny service any more than they can restrict access to roads.

Facebook built their own platform. Their servers and infrastructure is their own.

 

[colfax_m]

Just like the electric company does.

The electric company is a natural monopoly and common carrier. This is in no way similar to how a social media platform is governed.

 

[kaz]

This will likely get struck down by the courts. Also, it’s a violation of association rights, business rights, and property rights, but those don’t matter to those that only pay lip service to those principles anyway.

human rights come before those,,

You think you have a human right to a social media account? How hilariously entitled.

So just to be clear, if the electric company cuts your service for being a leftist, you don't have a problem with that.

Sure you don't, fascist. You're just for it because you're a Nazi and it's being used to silence your opposition.

Facebook, Google, et al can set up their own networks to provide their services. THEN they can deny service however they want. But they both decided to use taxpayer funded delivery systems, so they need to deliver their services to anyone who wants them

Stop kazzing. Twitter and Facebook aren't banning members for being rightists. They're banning them for violating their terms of service. Just like the electric company does.

Another lying fascist who wants to silence your opposition. You know perfectly well that only conservatives are being censored, Himmler

 

[dblack]

And the stalwart defenders of liberty on the right should hate it. But here we are.

Like your defense of Section 230?

I haven't defended 230, nazy boy. I'm all for repealing. If for nothing else than removing at as an excuse for your statist ambitions.

Until PA laws are repealed - if ever - they must be applied to ALL. You demand they be applied only when it furthers the agenda of the Reich.

So until there is perfect liberty, you're shooting for full-on socialism. Got it. Comrade.

 

[dblack]

There is a concept that libertarians hold --

You gave up on liberty long ago. Why keep pretending? But I think it's deeper than that. You seem to have lost touch with reality in the process.

 

[dblack]

 

[kaz]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

 

[dblack]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... "you didn't build that". Got it.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

Uh huh "public utility", "monopoly", "public accommodation", etc, etc.... Republicans are the new Democrats!

 

[kaz]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... "you didn't build that". Got it.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

Uh huh "public utility", "monopoly", "public accommodation", etc, etc.... Republicans are the new Democrats!

God you're stupid, neither of those are what I said.

Try reading my post again

 

[dblack]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... "you didn't build that". Got it.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

Uh huh "public utility", "monopoly", "public accommodation", etc, etc.... Republicans are the new Democrats!

God you're stupid, neither of those are what I said.

Try reading my post again

Ewww.... no way. Once was enough.

 

[kaz]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... "you didn't build that". Got it.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

Uh huh "public utility", "monopoly", "public accommodation", etc, etc.... Republicans are the new Democrats!

God you're stupid, neither of those are what I said.

Try reading my post again

Ewww.... no way. Once was enough.

What are you, eight?

You didn't address what I said, you made shit up I didn't say. It's called a strawman argument

 

[dblack]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... "you didn't build that". Got it.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

Uh huh "public utility", "monopoly", "public accommodation", etc, etc.... Republicans are the new Democrats!

God you're stupid, neither of those are what I said.

Try reading my post again

Ewww.... no way. Once was enough.

What are you, eight?

Nah. Just had enough of the phony rationalizations.

 

[kaz]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... "you didn't build that". Got it.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

Uh huh "public utility", "monopoly", "public accommodation", etc, etc.... Republicans are the new Democrats!

God you're stupid, neither of those are what I said.

Try reading my post again

Ewww.... no way. Once was enough.

What are you, eight?

Nah. Just had enough of the phony rationalizations.

Facebook paying for access to their own customers just isn't part of your apology tour for the Democrat party, huh?

 

[dblack]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... "you didn't build that". Got it.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

Uh huh "public utility", "monopoly", "public accommodation", etc, etc.... Republicans are the new Democrats!

God you're stupid, neither of those are what I said.

Try reading my post again

Ewww.... no way. Once was enough.

What are you, eight?

Nah. Just had enough of the phony rationalizations.

Facebook paying for access to their own customers just isn't part of your apology tour for the Democrat party, huh?

Do you really not recognize yourself making all the same excuses that Democrats have shoveled for years?

 

[dblack]

There are no principled justifications for this nonsense. Republicans just want to prevent social media companies from banning their trolls.

 

[kaz]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... "you didn't build that". Got it.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

Uh huh "public utility", "monopoly", "public accommodation", etc, etc.... Republicans are the new Democrats!

God you're stupid, neither of those are what I said.

Try reading my post again

Ewww.... no way. Once was enough.

What are you, eight?

Nah. Just had enough of the phony rationalizations.

Facebook paying for access to their own customers just isn't part of your apology tour for the Democrat party, huh?

Do you really not recognize yourself making all the same excuses that Democrats have shoveled for years?

I recognize you're twisting it to be the same.

The Internet companies proved they are a monopoly by successfully banning Trump and other conservatives. They are clearly using taxpayer money to do that.

If a baker won't serve gays, they cannot stop other bakers from serving gays.

When Parlor tried to give Trump a voice, the leftist monopolies shut down Parlor.

If facebook funded it's own access to it's customers, then they couldn't shut down their competition. But because of taxpayer money, they can put all their money into building their platform and you have no way to fight back that affects them.

To call those the same is just stupid

 

[kaz]

There are no principled justifications for this nonsense. Republicans just want to prevent social media companies from banning their trolls.

And again, bakeries can't shut down other bakeries who don't for example refuse to sell to blacks. Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon did successfully shut down Parlor. Clearly it's NOT free market. You just don't care because it helps your leftist ideology

 

[mdk]

So just to be clear, if the electric company cuts your service for being a leftist, you don't have a problem with that.

Sure you don't, fascist. You're just for it because you're a Nazi and it's being used to silence your opposition.

Facebook, Google, et al can set up their own networks to provide their services. THEN they can deny service however they want. But they both decided to use taxpayer funded delivery systems, so they need to deliver their services to anyone who wants them

Electric companies are classified as utilities, retard. The internet isn’t even classified as such and when is (I think should be) I highly doubt individual sites will be classified as utilities. At the end of the day you don’t have a right to a social media account. No one does. Sorry if that hurts your feelings, but I’m told we are supposed to **** those. lol

 

[mdk]

And the first amendment also does not guarantee to social media access that government should fund their access to their customers.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... "you didn't build that". Got it.

So seriously, you would be fine if the electric company shut off your power because of your political views? That would work for you.

Facebook is free to create it's own network and implement whatever the **** rules it wants. But if it's business is dependent on taxpayers, it needs to serve the public

Uh huh "public utility", "monopoly", "public accommodation", etc, etc.... Republicans are the new Democrats!

God you're stupid, neither of those are what I said.

Try reading my post again

Ewww.... no way. Once was enough.

What are you, eight?

Nah. Just had enough of the phony rationalizations.

Facebook paying for access to their own customers just isn't part of your apology tour for the Democrat party, huh?

Do you really not recognize yourself making all the same excuses that Democrats have shoveled for years?

None of that matters now. It’s totally different b/c they mistreated or something. Fools and their malleable principles.

 

[Faun]

This will likely get struck down by the courts. Also, it’s a violation of association rights, business rights, and property rights, but those don’t matter to those that only pay lip service to those principles anyway.

human rights come before those,,

You think you have a human right to a social media account? How hilariously entitled.

So just to be clear, if the electric company cuts your service for being a leftist, you don't have a problem with that.

Sure you don't, fascist. You're just for it because you're a Nazi and it's being used to silence your opposition.

Facebook, Google, et al can set up their own networks to provide their services. THEN they can deny service however they want. But they both decided to use taxpayer funded delivery systems, so they need to deliver their services to anyone who wants them

Stop kazzing. Twitter and Facebook aren't banning members for being rightists. They're banning them for violating their terms of service. Just like the electric company does.

Another lying fascist who wants to silence your opposition. You know perfectly well that only conservatives are being censored, Himmler

Why would I know something that is false?