Fix Is In: House Committee on ‘Russian Hacking’ Includes Only DNC-Hired Tech Experts

[easyt65]

You're a credulous imbecile...

Are you STILL pissed that someone leaked the fact that the Democrats rigged their Primary, engaged in voter fraud during the Primaries, and fed Hillary debate questions in advance of debates because that was the only way Hillary could win the DNC nomination over a 110 year of Socialist Party Member....or that Democrats were exposed through their own hacked and leaked e-mails as being racists, sexists, homophobes, and anti-Semites?

Dude, it's who the Democrats are. Don't be embarrassed by it - EMBRACE IT!

 

[IcebergSlim]

You're a credulous imbecile...

Are you STILL pissed that someone leaked the fact that the Democrats rigged their Primary, engaged in voter fraud during the Primaries, and fed Hillary debate questions in advance of debates because that was the only way Hillary could win the DNC nomination over a 110 year of Socialist Party Member....or that Democrats were exposed through their own hacked and leaked e-mails as being racists, sexists, homophobes, and anti-Semites?

Dude, it's who the Democrats are. Don't be embarrassed by it - EMBRACE IT!


View attachment 116137

Spell "Koskinen".....

 

[easyt65]

Spell "Koskinen".....

You get your ass handed to you with FACT, and the best you can do is correct spelling? Congrats - you get a 'Participation Trophy'!

 

[The Original Tree]

Can't wait until they get a subpoena for that server.

Try the witnesses for perjury then Republicans. Do it. I'd love to see you look like even bigger fools.

They already have the information so they don't need a warrant for anything. You think Crowdstrike falsified records? You think the FBI and 16 other intelligence organizations don't know how to recognize that?

There are no records. That is the whole damn problem. Aren't you paying attention?
No one has seen the "so called" evidence.

The report they came up with was more or less an "Editorial Opinion" piece devoid of a connect the dots approach to prove their "opinions."

It is also odd, and highly unusual that no one would look at THE DNC SERVER.....AT ALL!

Of course there are records. Why have Crowdstrike come in to testify if there aren't? **** you people are dumb.

The only record is their report.

That is why this whole thing is an issue and has never gone away.

Without looking at the actual server and it's logs, you will never be able to come to an INDEPENDENT CONCLUSION.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Sorry. The investigation wrapped up some time ago.

No, that was Barry's personal 'Watergate' he had running during the Presidential election. We're talking about the 'The Russians hacked the Election' investigation now....

I like how you removed the quote from your fellow deplorable that I responded to.

 

[easyt65]

Spell "Koskinen".....

"Mr. Holder is the first attorney general in history to be held in contempt by the House of Representatives. He earned this dubious distinction by refusing to turn over documents related to what may be the most reckless law enforcement operation ever undertaken by the Justice Department: Operation Fast and Furious."

Holder was Barry's 'corrupt sheriff' overseeing the most lawless administration in US History:

Hillary, Koskinen, Reid. Castro, Holder himself...the list of Democrats who should have been behind bars but were criminally spared from justice by Barry and Eric go on and on....but you just keep your head down and focus on spelling, snowflake.

 

[easyt65]

Without looking at the actual server and it's logs, you will never be able to come to an INDEPENDENT CONCLUSION.

Let me save everyone the trouble...and the American people their tax dollars:

The Russians did not 'Hack The Election'. The only ones who tried to do so were Barry and DHS when he was trying to seize control of ALL the states' election systems, claiming they were a critical infrastructure that must be controlled by and protected by his administration.

Thank GOD he & DHS failed to successfully hack them!

 

[tinydancer]

They said in the article that the witness list could be expanded. It's outrageous that no government agency has examined the servers.

This is bullshit.

 

[BlackFlag]

Can't wait until they get a subpoena for that server.

Try the witnesses for perjury then Republicans. Do it. I'd love to see you look like even bigger fools.

They already have the information so they don't need a warrant for anything. You think Crowdstrike falsified records? You think the FBI and 16 other intelligence organizations don't know how to recognize that?

There are no records. That is the whole damn problem. Aren't you paying attention?
No one has seen the "so called" evidence.

The report they came up with was more or less an "Editorial Opinion" piece devoid of a connect the dots approach to prove their "opinions."

It is also odd, and highly unusual that no one would look at THE DNC SERVER.....AT ALL!

Of course there are records. Why have Crowdstrike come in to testify if there aren't? **** you people are dumb.

The only record is their report.

That is why this whole thing is an issue and has never gone away.

Without looking at the actual server and it's logs, you will never be able to come to an INDEPENDENT CONCLUSION.

The FBI INDEPENDENTLY looked at their evidence and agreed with it. So either it's accurate, or the FBI's tech experts are incompetent and Crowdstrike will be risking it all and committing perjury in front of congress for no gain.

 

[Care4all]

And lost a few other things, such as phones, hard drives...

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

We keep relying on a firm paid to create a narrative in an election, who's assessment was the sum total of

"Well, it Could Be but we have no proof"

"It looks like, but we can't be sure."

And then neglected to display one shred of evidence in their report to even back up a weak claim.

So if you keep using the same corrupt sources and refuse to look in to this yourself, exactly how the phuck are you going to get to the bottom of this?
The IT tech who covered for Hillary's ass was given immunity and plead the 5th 256 consecutive times.

This is going to be a waste of taxpayer money.

You'll get no where with these folks.

You have to do your own Forensics.

You have to do your own Forensics.


Haven't you idiots been doing that for a while now?

We've been using LOGIC, which Liberals don't seem to understand.

The only way to do Forensics is to have possession of the server. The last time that happened THE FBI took possession of Hillary's "BLEACH BITTED" server and made an assessment.

They also destroyed two laptops to apparently cover up for some damaging evidence which may have lead to The President.

17 devices in all were destroyed\lost by Hillary Clinton who claimed she only used 1 device during her tenure as SOS.

She said that she set up the private server so she could "carry only 1 device" at all times, and could still keep her private emails separated from her work emails. For the convenience of not having to carry two phones, two devices...to keep them separate.

She had only 1 device that she used, at a time.

You guys have twisted that to say she lied when she answered that she had and used only 1 device, at a time....as Comey explained, she used only 1 smart phone at a time and used only 1 server for that smartphone....but she did upgrade her smart phone and server several times over the 4 years.

 

[easyt65]

The FBI INDEPENDENTLY looked at their evidence and agreed with it.

Mmmhmmmm....

I conferred with myself about my actions and we came to the conclusion that I was right all along. Case closed. .... Got it.

 

[easyt65]

She said that she set up the private server so she could "carry only 1 device" at all times, and could still keep her private emails separated from her work emails. For the convenience of not having to carry two phones, two devices...to keep them separate.

She had only 1 device that she used, at a time.

You guys have twisted that to say she lied when she answered that she had and used only 1 device, at a time....as Comey explained, she used only 1 smart phone at a time and used only 1 server for that smartphone....but she did upgrade her smart phone and server several times over the 4 years.

Are you STILL pushing that BULLSHIT? Hillary claimed she carried her BLACKBERRY and another device because she didn't know how to work 2 e-mails on 1 device.
-- Her own staff called her 'technology ' technically challenged'

Of course if the old ***** wouldn't have used 2 e-mails and instead followed guidance / rules and obeyed the FOIA and Federal Records Act by using only 1 e-mail, her official one, she wouldn't have been up to her ass in alligators.

 

[BlackFlag]

The FBI INDEPENDENTLY looked at their evidence and agreed with it.

Mmmhmmmm....

I conferred with myself about my actions and we came to the conclusion that I was right all along. Case closed. .... Got it.

View attachment 116143

Actually that's the Trump approach. He's a total fool. The FBI isn't.

 

[Defiant1]

And lost a few other things, such as phones, hard drives...

Again, Why has NOT ONE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, or THE DOJ, FBI or anyone subpoened this damn server?

We keep relying on a firm paid to create a narrative in an election, who's assessment was the sum total of

"Well, it Could Be but we have no proof"

"It looks like, but we can't be sure."

And then neglected to display one shred of evidence in their report to even back up a weak claim.

So if you keep using the same corrupt sources and refuse to look in to this yourself, exactly how the phuck are you going to get to the bottom of this?
The IT tech who covered for Hillary's ass was given immunity and plead the 5th 256 consecutive times.

This is going to be a waste of taxpayer money.

You'll get no where with these folks.

You have to do your own Forensics.

You have to do your own Forensics.


Haven't you idiots been doing that for a while now?

We've been using LOGIC, which Liberals don't seem to understand.

The only way to do Forensics is to have possession of the server. The last time that happened THE FBI took possession of Hillary's "BLEACH BITTED" server and made an assessment.

They also destroyed two laptops to apparently cover up for some damaging evidence which may have lead to The President.

17 devices in all were destroyed\lost by Hillary Clinton who claimed she only used 1 device during her tenure as SOS.

She said that she set up the private server so she could "carry only 1 device" at all times, and could still keep her private emails separated from her work emails. For the convenience of not having to carry two phones, two devices...to keep them separate.

She had only 1 device that she used, at a time.

You guys have twisted that to say she lied when she answered that she had and used only 1 device, at a time....as Comey explained, she used only 1 smart phone at a time and used only 1 server for that smartphone....but she did upgrade her smart phone and server several times over the 4 years.

And you can only drive one way at a time on a one way street.

 

[easyt65]

The FBI INDEPENDENTLY looked at their evidence and agreed with it.

Mmmhmmmm....

I conferred with myself about my actions and we came to the conclusion that I was right all along. Case closed. .... Got it.

View attachment 116143

Actually that's the Trump approach. He's a total fool. The FBI isn't.

NO, snowflake. Your original post stated, "The FBI INDEPENDENTLY looked at their evidence and agreed with it." Don't suddenly try to change it after you've gotten burned. ;p

 

[The Original Tree]

Can't wait until they get a subpoena for that server.

They already have the information so they don't need a warrant for anything. You think Crowdstrike falsified records? You think the FBI and 16 other intelligence organizations don't know how to recognize that?

There are no records. That is the whole damn problem. Aren't you paying attention?
No one has seen the "so called" evidence.

The report they came up with was more or less an "Editorial Opinion" piece devoid of a connect the dots approach to prove their "opinions."

It is also odd, and highly unusual that no one would look at THE DNC SERVER.....AT ALL!

Of course there are records. Why have Crowdstrike come in to testify if there aren't? **** you people are dumb.

The only record is their report.

That is why this whole thing is an issue and has never gone away.

Without looking at the actual server and it's logs, you will never be able to come to an INDEPENDENT CONCLUSION.

The FBI INDEPENDENTLY looked at their evidence and agreed with it. So either it's accurate, or the FBI's tech experts are incompetent and Crowdstrike will be risking it all and committing perjury in front of congress for no gain.

THE FBI LOOKED AT NO SUCH EVIDENCE.
Why do you think this is still an issue? Because of that very fact.

The FBI looked at only the report which was absent of the actual evidence for them to examine.

Research it yourself.

It's why we are still talking about this a year later.

No one has seen the server so therefore there will never be any closure until the server is inspected and evidence shown the public.

 

[BlackFlag]

The FBI INDEPENDENTLY looked at their evidence and agreed with it.

Mmmhmmmm....

I conferred with myself about my actions and we came to the conclusion that I was right all along. Case closed. .... Got it.

View attachment 116143

Actually that's the Trump approach. He's a total fool. The FBI isn't.

NO, snowflake. Your original post stated, "The FBI INDEPENDENTLY looked at their evidence and agreed with it." Don't suddenly try to change it after you've gotten burned. ;p

They did fool. You think Crowdstrike just told them something and the FBI didn't look into it?

 

[BlackFlag]

They already have the information so they don't need a warrant for anything. You think Crowdstrike falsified records? You think the FBI and 16 other intelligence organizations don't know how to recognize that?

There are no records. That is the whole damn problem. Aren't you paying attention?
No one has seen the "so called" evidence.

The report they came up with was more or less an "Editorial Opinion" piece devoid of a connect the dots approach to prove their "opinions."

It is also odd, and highly unusual that no one would look at THE DNC SERVER.....AT ALL!

Of course there are records. Why have Crowdstrike come in to testify if there aren't? **** you people are dumb.

The only record is their report.

That is why this whole thing is an issue and has never gone away.

Without looking at the actual server and it's logs, you will never be able to come to an INDEPENDENT CONCLUSION.

The FBI INDEPENDENTLY looked at their evidence and agreed with it. So either it's accurate, or the FBI's tech experts are incompetent and Crowdstrike will be risking it all and committing perjury in front of congress for no gain.

THE FBI LOOKED AT NO SUCH EVIDENCE.
Why do you think this is still an issue? Because of that very fact.

The FBI looked at only the report which was absent of the actual evidence for them to examine.

Research it yourself.

It's why we are still talking about this a year later.

No one has seen the server so therefore there will never be any closure until the server is inspected and evidence shown the public.

The FBI is not Trump. Crowdstrike turned over information to them. The FBI does not act on unfounded opinions like Trump does.

 

[depotoo]

Honey, you know nothing of which you speak. Koskinen perjured himself.
It was also found, by a Judge, the practice of targeting had not stopped.
Sad you didn't care enough to listen to them.
Search | C-SPAN.org
House Judiciary Committee Examines IRS | Video | C-SPAN.org
House Judiciary Committee Examines IRS | Video | C-SPAN.org
Examining the Allegations of Misconduct Against IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Part I - House Judiciary Committee
https://www.c-span.org/video/?415546-1/irs-commissioner-john-koskinen-testifies-capitol-hill
http://www.cincinnati.com/story/new...n-occurred-against-tea-party-groups/94023482/

https://cei.org/blog/another-court-...ly-targeted-tea-party-and-conservative-groups
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_...-continues-to-harass-conservative-groups.html


And his elitist attitude was enough to make you want to puke.

Try the witnesses for perjury then Republicans. Do it. I'd love to see you look like even bigger fools.

Only if they actually Perjure themselves on the stand....like Koshkinen, Holder, etc did...

Except that neither of them did anything of the sort....

and it's Koskinen.....but then, I'm sure you've only HEARD his name, bleated repeatedly by the Oxycontin Addled Blowhard.

Do you have any idea why you are being told to hate on that gentleman?

 

[BlackFlag]

Honey, you know nothing of which you speak. Koskinen perjured himself.
It was also found, by a Judge, the practice of targeting had not stopped.
Sad you didn't care enough to listen to them.
Search | C-SPAN.org
House Judiciary Committee Examines IRS | Video | C-SPAN.org
House Judiciary Committee Examines IRS | Video | C-SPAN.org
Examining the Allegations of Misconduct Against IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, Part I - House Judiciary Committee
IRS Commissioner John Koskinen Testifies Capitol | Video | C-SPAN.org
Judge to IRS: 'Strong showing' discrimination occurred against tea party group

Another Court Ruling Confirms IRS Illegally Targeted Tea Party and Conservative Groups
TaxProf Blog


And his elitist attitude was enough to make you want to puke.

Try the witnesses for perjury then Republicans. Do it. I'd love to see you look like even bigger fools.

Only if they actually Perjure themselves on the stand....like Koshkinen, Holder, etc did...

Except that neither of them did anything of the sort....

and it's Koskinen.....but then, I'm sure you've only HEARD his name, bleated repeatedly by the Oxycontin Addled Blowhard.

Do you have any idea why you are being told to hate on that gentleman?

Strange how Trump and Sessions don't seem to care at all despite your extensive personal research