First Step Toward bringing to heel Lunatic Judge in Flynn Case.

[MACAULAY]

"A federal appeals court on Thursday ordered the judge handling the criminal case of President Donald Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn, to respond to a request by Flynn’s lawyers to dismiss the case."

Appeals court orders Michael Flynn judge to respond to demand for dismissal of case against ex-Trump advisor

The Department of Justice two weeks earlier made the surprise move to abandon its own prosecution of Flynn.

www.cnbc.com

This article is by one of the Democratic Media---so the spin will always be there. More honest reports likely soon.

 

[MACAULAY]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

 

[the other mike]

Federal appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to respond to motion to dismiss charges

A federal appeals court on Thursday directed the judge hearing the case against former national security adviser Michael Flynn to respond to a petition by Flynn for the charges against him to be thrown out.

www.foxnews.com

 

[White 6]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

The word is "cite".

If the judge does decide to punish him, who is going to see that any punishment is carried out? The DOJ wants to drop charges because it makes them susceptible to charges of malicious prosecution.

 

[task0778]

I cannot imagine what Sullivan can possibly say that would permit the abrogation of the separation of powers between the Judicial and Executive Branches. What he did cannot possibly be allowed to stand.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

Cite? Contempt?



All these fucking "legal scholars."

.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Any....day....now.....
But hey, you read what you want into this. The appeals court is just setting a timeline. Not a ruling.

 

[Billiejeens]

The way the system works is one side prosecutes, one side defends and the Judges referees.

In this case the judge has moved into the prosecutor position, this way doesn't work.

 

[MACAULAY]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

__________

In jurisprudence, duress or coercion refers to a situation whereby a person performs an act as a result of violence, threat, or other pressure against the person.

You may not be able to comprehend, but you have had, and will continue to have, the opportunity to understand the Hell this 33 year Combat General went through, because the criminal Obama had it in for him.

If you had any sense, you would be very worried about what our own Government can do and is is willing to do if run by criminals like Obama, Rice, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, et al.

_____

 

[task0778]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

The word is "cite".

If the judge does decide to punish him, who is going to see that any punishment is carried out? The DOJ wants to drop charges because it makes them susceptible to charges of malicious prosecution.

I kinda think Flynn is going to sue the FBI/DOJ anyway, as he should IMHO. I don't know if criminal charges can be brought against anybody involved, the burden of proof is harder than it is in civil cases. But I would love to see them effers going to jail for what they did.

 

[MACAULAY]

Any....day....now.....
But hey, you read what you want into this. The appeals court is just setting a timeline. Not a ruling.

___________

I read---that they did not have to require the Judge to, in effect, explain his behavior. Writ of Mandamus is an extreme remedy. The Court could have dismissed it without comment.

If you are a Democrat/Socialist/Bolshevik-in-Waiting----hoping a 33 year Combat General continues to get Railroaded by Gestapo-like tactics---you can't like the "timeline".

_______

 

[Billiejeens]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

__________

In jurisprudence, duress or coercion refers to a situation whereby a person performs an act as a result of violence, threat, or other pressure against the person.

You may not be able to comprehend, but you have had, and will continue to have, the opportunity to understand the Hell this 33 year Combat General went through, because the criminal Obama had it in for him.

If you had any sense, you would be very worried about what our own Government can do and is is willing to do if run by criminals like Obama, Rice, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, et al.

_____

That one wants to come across as this super Patriot -
He is a Comey clone, because he is sure they will never turn on him.

 

[meaner gene]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

Slow down. What's the rush? Flynn isn't going anywhere until there's a ruling. And the courts are running in slow motion because many things are on hold because of the coronavirus.

If Flynn was sitting in jail, I would agree somebody should light a fire under the judges ass, but Flynn is a free man. And will continue to be a free man no matter now long it takes.

 

[Billiejeens]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

The word is "cite".

If the judge does decide to punish him, who is going to see that any punishment is carried out? The DOJ wants to drop charges because it makes them susceptible to charges of malicious prosecution.

I kinda think Flynn is going to sue the FBI/DOJ anyway, as he should IMHO. I don't know if criminal charges can be brought against anybody involved, the burden of proof is harder than it is in civil cases. But I would love to see them effers going to jail for what they did.

Yeah, probably not.
He may want to look into suing his original legal team, which we may find were simply incompetent, or they may have taking a dive for the prosecution.
That might lead some where.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

Slow down. What's the rush? Flynn isn't going anywhere until there's a ruling. And the courts are running in slow motion because many things are on hold because of the coronavirus.

If Flynn was sitting in jail, I would agree somebody should light a fire under the judges ass, but Flynn is a free man. And will continue to be a free man no matter now long it takes.

He is paying his lawyer!

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Any....day....now.....
But hey, you read what you want into this. The appeals court is just setting a timeline. Not a ruling.

___________

I read---that they did not have to require the Judge to, in effect, explain his behavior. Writ of Mandamus is an extreme remedy. The Court could have dismissed it without comment.

If you are a Democrat/Socialist/Bolshevik-in-Waiting----hoping a 33 year Combat General continues to get Railroaded by Gestapo-like tactics---you can't like the "timeline".

_______

Yeah...and if that "33 year Combat General" had just remained faithful to his oath..instead of to his god (LOCK HER...errr HIM UP!!), he wouldn't be in the hot water he's in...errr.....OK, lukewarm water...Thanks Billy Barr!!

 

[meaner gene]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

The word is "cite".

If the judge does decide to punish him, who is going to see that any punishment is carried out? The DOJ wants to drop charges because it makes them susceptible to charges of malicious prosecution.

Contempt of court - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In United States jurisprudence, acts of contempt are generally divided into direct or indirect and civil or criminal. Direct contempt occurs in the presence of a judge; civil contempt is "coercive and remedial" as opposed to punitive. In the United States, relevant statutes include 18 U.S.C. §§ 401–403 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42.[16]

1. Direct contempt is that which occurs in the presence of the presiding judge (in facie curiae) and may be dealt with summarily: the judge notifies the offending party that he or she has acted in a manner which disrupts the tribunal and prejudices the administration of justice. After giving the person the opportunity to respond, the judge may impose the sanction immediately.

 

[White 6]

Another report:

"A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it."

Appeals court orders judge in Flynn case to explain actions in dismissal

Flynn's lawyers filed an appeal two days ago.

justthenews.com

He absolutely should have already ruled on the justice department motion and the Flynn defense motion, eve if the ruling was no. Would not be surprised if he is taking time considering whether to site Flynn with contempt for standing in front of him, raising his right hand and verbally affirming/admitting to the crimes already admitted in the plea agreement that kept other charges out, and making verbal contrition.

The word is "cite".

If the judge does decide to punish him, who is going to see that any punishment is carried out? The DOJ wants to drop charges because it makes them susceptible to charges of malicious prosecution.

If the judge does not accept the motion and sentences. Justice, defense etc will most likely appeal, unless you think they will just say "OK Mike, we tried, see ya in 4 months,"

 

[meaner gene]

The way the system works is one side prosecutes, one side defends and the Judges referees.

In this case the judge has moved into the prosecutor position, this way doesn't work.

Actually Judge Sullivan appointed a retired judge to act in that role. As you pointed out, american courts are an "adversarial" system. Which means you NEED to have both sides of a controversy represented.