First call obama should be impeached.

I agree only with the first one. How 'bout you? Did Bush win his two elections? Have you ever carried a sign reading "Selected Not Elected"? Did you ever call him the pResident?
But he WAS selected by the Extreme Court "against the will of the people" as CON$ like to say today.
um, which "cons" use that?
include the context or at least a LINK to it when you do
Still defending your MessiahRushie! :rofl:

search

"against the will of the people" search

Document 1 - 8 of 1630


1 Next Act Against the Will of the People: Union Pension Bailouts
Aug 17, 2010 ... On issue after issue after issue Obama is governing against the will of the American people. I don't care whether it's this or any other ...
2 This Regime Governs Against Will of People and Purposely Kills Jobs
Apr 2, 2010 ... This regime is governing against the will of the people. What happened to the 95000 new jobs every month we were promised? ...
3 "Regime": Matthews Freaks Out Over Same Word He Used on Bush
Apr 5, 2010 ... I gave 'em a reaction and I said, "I've never seen a regime that governs against the will of the people, purposely like this. ...
4 It's Payback Time: The Obama Economy is Purposeful Disaster
Jul 2, 2010 ... I never feel that we had a president actually governing against the country, against the will of the people. I know we've had liberals. ...
5 Obama Has His Boot on the Throat of the United States of America
May 21, 2010 ... Why are they governing against the will of the people?" Now, Coulter just said, "It's that they don't know anybody who's not in the ACLU. ...
6 The "Troublesome" El Rushbo Responds to President Obama
Apr 2, 2010 ... Never in my life have I seen a regime like this governing so against the will of the people, purposely. I have never known more people ...
7 "Producing Papers" is Lethal to Democrat Ability to Win Elections
Apr 28, 2010 ... They know they have to govern against you. They have to govern against the will of the people. They know that you know that the way they're ...
8 Obama's Assault on Middle Class
Mar 22, 2010 ... I don't know if that's what he meant or not, but one thing they know: They know they're governing against the will of the people. ...


"against the will of the people" - Google Search

About 6,880,000 results (0.34 seconds)

RealClearPolitics - Video - McCain: "When You Go Against The Will ...
Mar 22, 2010 ... McCain: "When You Go Against The Will Of The People, You Pay A Price". Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) reacts to the passing of health reform. ...
www.realclearpolitics.com/.../mccain_when_you_go_against_the_will_of_the _people_you_pay_a_price.html - Cached

RealClearPolitics - Video - O'Reilly: Obama Again "Going Against ...
Aug 17, 2010 ... O'Reilly: Obama Again "Going Against The Will Of The People". Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com. Bill O'Reilly on President ...
www.realclearpolitics.com/.../oreilly_obama_again_going_against_the_will_ of_the_people.html - Cached
 
again, edthemoron, hes not that to me
and you still dont understand CONTEXT
 
again, edthemoron, hes not that to me
and you still dont understand CONTEXT
Hey DumbAss, you use the search terms and you get links to the whole articles.
next you will want me to read them for you.

Damn you are even lazier than the normally lazy CON$ervative slackers.
 
again, edthemoron, hes not that to me
and you still dont understand CONTEXT
Hey DumbAss, you use the search terms and you get links to the whole articles.
next you will want me to read them for you.

Damn you are even lazier than the normally lazy CON$ervative slackers.
no, i dont need to
but you sure are a ******* idiot
LOL
 
I must have missed the Bush impeachment proceedings
I meant when the GOP takes the House this fall. There's no way you'll accept defeat calmly and gracefully. :lol:

Do you mean like claiming the Constitution is being violated?

or better yet.....Obama only won because he is black?

Or wait Dave...I got a better one......how about Obama wasn't born in this country?

Absolutely true. He sure didn't win because he was the most qualified.
 
Seems to me, we have a corrupt government with no means to clean it up. That isn't Representative government or freedom by and for the people. It seems that simple to me,....you don't have the tools or toys, they belong to someone who is corrupted.

Let me say this Ed, you can make lists all day of grievances, but none rise to the level of war crimes and the chaining & detaining of women and children that were tortured, murdered and raped. Now don't say you didn't have an opportunity to express yourself, but you set the precedences. Any judge would laugh your Obama complaints out of court.
 
Last edited:
Do you mean like claiming the Constitution is being violated?

or better yet.....Obama only won because he is black?

Or wait Dave...I got a better one......how about Obama wasn't born in this country?
I agree only with the first one. How 'bout you? Did Bush win his two elections? Have you ever carried a sign reading "Selected Not Elected"? Did you ever call him the pResident?

Calling names is different than impeachment proceedings

Republicans can't tell the difference

Ahhh. It's different. Somehow. It just is. :lol:
 
Do you mean like claiming the Constitution is being violated?

or better yet.....Obama only won because he is black?

Or wait Dave...I got a better one......how about Obama wasn't born in this country?
I agree only with the first one. How 'bout you? Did Bush win his two elections? Have you ever carried a sign reading "Selected Not Elected"? Did you ever call him the pResident?
But he WAS selected by the Extreme Court "against the will of the people" as CON$ like to say today.

How AWFUL of SCOTUS to insist that Florida follow their own laws! :(
 
I meant when the GOP takes the House this fall. There's no way you'll accept defeat calmly and gracefully. :lol:

Do you mean like claiming the Constitution is being violated?

or better yet.....Obama only won because he is black?

Or wait Dave...I got a better one......how about Obama wasn't born in this country?

Absolutely true. He sure didn't win because he was the most qualified.

Or because the Republicans had control of the country for eight years and started two wars and trashed the economy

Voters don't consider things like that....it must have been because he was black
 
Or because the Republicans had control of the country for eight years and started two wars and trashed the economy

Voters don't consider things like that....it must have been because he was black

were you for us going into Afghanistan Rw?.....
 
I agree only with the first one. How 'bout you? Did Bush win his two elections? Have you ever carried a sign reading "Selected Not Elected"? Did you ever call him the pResident?
But he WAS selected by the Extreme Court "against the will of the people" as CON$ like to say today.

How AWFUL of SCOTUS to insist that Florida follow their own laws! :(
Nice attempt at diversion via the dumb act, but the fact remains that CON$ are whining that Obama is governing "against the will of the people" because right wing polls show a majority of Americans do not support Obama's policies, but have no problem with the fact that Bush LOST the popular vote and therefore was selected president "against the will of the people."

As I have pointed out many times before, CON$ contradict themselves from one day to the next and from one issue to the next. :cuckoo:
 
Or because the Republicans had control of the country for eight years and started two wars and trashed the economy

Voters don't consider things like that....it must have been because he was black

were you for us going into Afghanistan Rw?.....

Yes I was. So was most of the world.

If Bush had gone in, cleaned out the Taliban, chased out AlQaeda, captured Bin Laden and left enough troops to maintain stability, I would have been satisfied.
But Bush's attempt to establish a Bush Doctrine in the region and start some type of Democracy Domino Theory was bure idiocy.
He ended up accomplishing neither mission
 
Yes I was. So was most of the world.

If Bush had gone in, cleaned out the Taliban, chased out AlQaeda, captured Bin Laden and left enough troops to maintain stability, I would have been satisfied.
But Bush's attempt to establish a Bush Doctrine in the region and start some type of Democracy Domino Theory was bure idiocy.
He ended up accomplishing neither mission

the reason i asked is because you mentioned it as one of the wars the Republicans started,Iraq i agree,foolish.....if most of everyone was for it, why mention it like it was a bad thing?.....would not the Dems if in charge have done the same thing?.....what happened afterwards had nothing to do with going in.....
 
Last edited:
15th post
But he WAS selected by the Extreme Court "against the will of the people" as CON$ like to say today.

How AWFUL of SCOTUS to insist that Florida follow their own laws! :(
Nice attempt at diversion via the dumb act, but the fact remains that CON$ are whining that Obama is governing "against the will of the people" because right wing polls show a majority of Americans do not support Obama's policies, but have no problem with the fact that Bush LOST the popular vote and therefore was selected president "against the will of the people."
But in accordance with the Constitution and the electoral college vote.
As I have pointed out many times before, CON$ contradict themselves from one day to the next and from one issue to the next. :cuckoo:
It's funny how you pretend that should mean something. :lol:
 
Yes I was. So was most of the world.

If Bush had gone in, cleaned out the Taliban, chased out AlQaeda, captured Bin Laden and left enough troops to maintain stability, I would have been satisfied.
But Bush's attempt to establish a Bush Doctrine in the region and start some type of Democracy Domino Theory was bure idiocy.
He ended up accomplishing neither mission

the reason i asked is because you mentioned it as one of the wars the Republicans started,Iraq i agree,foolish.....if most of everyone was for it, why mention it like it was a bad thing?.....would not the Dems if in charge have done the same thing?.....what happened afterwards had nothing to do with going in.....

Afghanistan made sense.....its execution did not

One of the largest tactical military blunders in US History......Iraq was another

Amazining how Bush managed to botch both
 
Last edited:
How AWFUL of SCOTUS to insist that Florida follow their own laws! :(
Nice attempt at diversion via the dumb act, but the fact remains that CON$ are whining that Obama is governing "against the will of the people" because right wing polls show a majority of Americans do not support Obama's policies, but have no problem with the fact that Bush LOST the popular vote and therefore was selected president "against the will of the people."
But in accordance with the Constitution and the electoral college vote.
Just as Obama is governing in accordance with the Constitution and Congressional voting, but that hasn't stopped CON$ from saying Obama is governing "against the will of the people" so therefore Bush was still selected president "against the will of the people."

I only use established CON$ervative rationalizations to expose the complete hypocrisy of the hate religion of CON$ervatism.
 
Afghanistan made sense.....its execution did not

One of the largest tactical military blunders in US History......Iraq was another

Amazining how Bush managed to botch both

thats not what you said.....you mentioned Afghanistan like its a war the Republicans started.....when you and 90% of the Democrats were for it......what happened after it began is another story.....but going in was a joint venture.....
 
Back
Top Bottom