Fire every federal bureaucrat/employee caught undermining the administration.

[martybegan]

Including his views of politicizing the DoJ and prosecuting political enemies. Gotcha.

He isn't doing that. Biden and Garland did that, you just don't care because you agree with what they did.

Was Hillary indicted by the DOJ between 2016 and 2021, yes or no?

 

[westwall]

Trump said it on national television.

Look up presidential debates.

Yes, he specifically talked about her email crimes that Comey admitted to on TV.

So, REAL FELONIES, three of them, as opposed to the made up lawfare.

 

[hadit]

Including his views of politicizing the DoJ and prosecuting political enemies. Gotcha.

You don't have to agree with everything he says and does. The only candidate who would be that agreeable to you is yourself. Did you agree with every policy position set forth by your chose candidate?

 

[Marener]

I am explaining my views on it, not my fault you are either unwilling or unable to comprehend this.

No you’re not, you’re avoiding it. You’re refusing to answer questions that you don’t like.

You’re perfectly happy to let Trump politicize the DoJ or anything else and if anyone gets in the way, you want them gone.

 

[SeaMajor7]

What about 400 years of American history?

400 YEARS OF WHAT?????????????????????????
We're not even at 250 yet.

 

[martybegan]

No you’re not, you’re avoiding it. You’re refusing to answer questions that you don’t like.

You’re perfectly happy to let Trump politicize the DoJ or anything else and if anyone gets in the way, you want them gone.

I answered it.

He hasn't done that. Show me a politicized Trump DOJ prosecution as an example.

 

[Foxfyre]

And you don't have to agree with everything he says and does. The only candidate who would be that agreeable to you is yourself.

Ditto for federal employees. They may hate the President and his policies and agenda which is their right, but if those policies and agenda are not clearly illegal, they should be honor bound to work for him and the American people. If they cannot do that they should resign. If they refuse to do that, they should be fired on the spot.

 

[MisterBeale]

There is no ratified Carbon Treaty in the US, so your point is moot.

Are you going with theoreticals, or are you just too full of yourself to admit you didn't know Kyoto and Paris were never ratified by the Senate?

I looked it up.

The only "climate treaty," that the Senate approved was banning HFCs.

Kigali Amendment - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

He is either stoopid or lying.

 

[Foxfyre]

No you’re not, you’re avoiding it. You’re refusing to answer questions that you don’t like.

You’re perfectly happy to let Trump politicize the DoJ or anything else and if anyone gets in the way, you want them gone.

Name one incident that Trump politicized the DOJ. If you cannot do that, you have no argument here at all and are just trolling.

Do you think federal employees/appointees should be able to undermine President Trumps policies and agenda and do so with immunity?

 

[Marener]

He isn't doing that. Biden and Garland did that, you just don't care because you agree with what they did.

Was Hillary indicted by the DOJ between 2016 and 2021, yes or no?

he wanted to do that. He was told he can’t. Now, according to you this shouldn’t have happened.

Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton (Published 2018)

The encounter was one of the most blatant examples yet of how President Trump views the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies.

www.nytimes.com

The only reason it didn’t happen is because he was refused by people loyal to the country and not the president.

 

[MisterBeale]

400 YEARS OF WHAT?????????????????????????
We're not even at 250 yet.

For this British twit, the United States does not exist.


We are still just a colony of the crown in his view.


Nothing significant happened July 4, 1776 from his POV.


Why else would he want global technocrats to control the U.S., rather than have the will of the people expressed through their elected representatives as proscribed by the Constitution.

 

[Marener]

Name one incident that Trump politicized the DOJ. If you cannot do that, you have no argument here at all and are just trolling.

Do you think federal employees/appointees should be able to undermine President Trumps policies and agenda and do so with immunity?

I think employees should refuse to do illegal things or accept politicization of the government.

Trump tried to tell DoJ attorneys to sign a letter calling the election corrupt. That was an attempt to politicize the government and they refused.

Should have they all been fired?

 

[westwall]

400 YEARS OF WHAT?????????????????????????
We're not even at 250 yet.

Postman appears to be an Im2stupid sock!

 

[Marener]

I answered it.

He hasn't done that. Show me a politicized Trump DOJ prosecution as an example.

Tell me how you concluded that the DoJ prosecuting Trump was political. These prosecutions weren’t filed by Garland and weren’t ordered by Biden.

 

[Marener]

You don't have to agree with everything he says and does. The only candidate who would be that agreeable to you is yourself. Did you agree with every policy position set forth by your chose candidate?

There are red lines.

 

[Zincwarrior]

No, but if I routinely go to social media and announce that I'm going to do everything I can to obstruct and resist the new CEO, I can expect to get fired.

Yes. To be clear, I don't think this matters for 99% of the workforce. They do their jobs, drink bad coffee, go home.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Tell me how you concluded that the DoJ prosecuting Trump was political. These prosecutions weren’t filed by Garland and weren’t ordered by Biden.

I wouldn't bet on that if I were you.......

 

[braalian]

What does “undermining the administration” even entail?

 

[g5000]

Here is what Trump is having to deal with even before taking office. We saw it played out by FBI personnel et al in his first administration and no doubt it will continue, i.e. federal bureaucrats/employees intentionally undermining and/or sabotaging the President and his agenda.



I want Congress to pass a law mandating that any bureaucrat/employee/appointee who is caught and confirmed in deliberately sabotaging or otherwise interfering with the elected leadership can be immediately fired and will be entitled to no benefits. If sufficiently severe, the person can be indicted and tried for criminal acts.

No President can do his job as effectively with this kind of deep state subversion going on.

Federal employees must be instructed and must agree to work faithfully for the people's choice as their leaders or they must be out.

That of course would not apply to honest whistle blowers who go through proper channels to report any obvious malfeasance going on within the government.

I have seen posted on social media that Mannina was fired over the incident in the link but I have not confirmed that.

Put them up against the wall! Burn the Reichstag! Get the trains running on time to the concentration camps!

 

[Foxfyre]

I think employees should refuse to do illegal things or accept politicization of the government.

Trump tried to tell DoJ attorneys to sign a letter calling the election corrupt. That was an attempt to politicize the government and they refused.

Should have they all been fired?

I did not say illegal things. Do you think federal employees should have the right to undermine the President and/or his legitimate authority or agenda? And if they are caught doing that, should they be fired?

Come on. Show some integrity. Answer the question.

And show your evidence for Trump telling DOJ attorneys to sign a letter calling the election corrupt or it never happened. Even a decidedly anti-Trump Google isn't bringing up anything like that.

My OP allows for legitimate whistle blowing if employees do need to report anything illegal.