A retired naval officer was beaten by the Feds for asking why they were violating their oath.
That's merely a ridiculous unsupported assertion.
I challenge you to explain the reasoning that you used to come to the conclusion that he was beaten for asking a question. Explain the train of logic that you used to come to that conclusion.
I predict that you will run away from that challenge with your tail between your legs, as LWNJ moonbats tend to do when their faulty logic is challenged.
I have answered that a dozen times. Every time a moron finally checks the thread they demand to know how I can say that.
Just as I predicted, you ran away from the challenge with your tail between your legs.
You made an unsupported assertion, and when challenged to explain your reasoning, you came up totally blank.
Nonsense. I told you it had been covered, read the thread you idiot.
Like this link from the page before your demand. One page back. ONE.
'yer' needs some critical thinking on YER part to figure out why i spell it that way. Nope, figured it out from the start. You're projecting, pretending your opposition is uneducated when it's obviously you. something apparently you just can't figure out. See above. being stupid doesn't mean...
www.usmessageboard.com
And another on the exact same page. ONE PAGE BACK.
'yer' needs some critical thinking on YER part to figure out why i spell it that way. Nope, figured it out from the start. You're projecting, pretending your opposition is uneducated when it's obviously you. something apparently you just can't figure out. See above. being stupid doesn't mean...
www.usmessageboard.com
So I typed out the response to others not once, but twice, one one page. Yet, you want it addressed to you or it is cowardice. Nonsense. I am not responsible for your laziness. NOT ONCE BUT TWICE on the same page, one page back. ONE. You couldn't be bothered. Too busy sending out messages to other Trump Supporters to explain about the dangers of Communism or what?
Now, since you are too lazy to both reading anything posted previously. You blithering short attention spanned idiot. Let me help you out.
When is force authorized by law? You do not get to beat on people even if you are wearing a badge do you? No. You have to have a reason. The reasons by law, which I rarely object to are 1) Self Defense. For self defense the Navy Vet would have had to attack them. If he had, he would have been arrested for assaulting a Federal Agent. He was not arrested. 43 others were, but he was not. So he did not attack them. 2) Encroaching on the Federal Property in an effort to disperse the crowd. OK, but after beating him they retreat to their lines. They came out from their lines, to beat on him, and then retreated back to their lines. So dispersing the crowd was not the reason, otherwise the others there would have been beaten too wouldn't they?
What other reasons could there be for using force BY LAW? I don't like you is not a reason. Effecting an arrest? Well he wasn't arrested, so that wasn't it. Therefore the use of force was unjustified, and the only reason was he was shouting at them. How dare he?
So you and your Totalitarianism can take a flying **** at a rolling donut you douche. Now, the only way to counter my argument is to show what he did to deserve the beating. You won't. You'll claim I didn't make my case, but will make none yourself. So I challenge you douche. Prove he did something to deserve it. Post a link.. A video. Something.