Federal Judge Tosses Trump's Pennsylvania Lawsuit

[pyetro]

The futility continues as a Republican Federal Judge dismisses another Trump lawsuit.
Is it time for Republicans to end the nonsense and admit you lost?

Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign Pennsylvania lawsuit

A federal judge dealt a death blow to the Trump campaign's effort to overturn President-elect Joe Biden's win of the presidency on Saturday, by dismissing a closely watched lawsuit that sought to invalidate millions of Pennsylvania votes.

www.cnn.com

Because these are fake leftist crack pot judges

The judge is a Republican.

 

[Skylar]

The legal brief Giuliani submitted even misspelled the governor's name.

"The brief filed Saturday, which is littered with spelling errors, including the governor's name, alleges that illegal votes were counted and poll watchers were unable to access vote counting — allegations that the Trump campaign dropped just last Sunday, before Rudy Giuliani was put in charge of the president's growing legal challenges."

At least Giuliani did not ask this judge like he did in his last court appearance where the nearest martini bar is.

It just does not get more sad or ridiculous.

Trump campaign appeals Pennsylvania judge's decision to dismiss lawsuit that seeks to delay certifying election results

The judge wrote in his order that the plaintiffs employed "strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."

www.cbsnews.com

To give you the magnitude of the stupidity on display by Gulliani...his ineptitude is so utter that we're talking about his failures in court rather than the fact that he was recently revealed on camera to jump on to a bed and shove his hands down his pants in front of a supposedly underage girl.

That's barely a ripple in this tsunami of stupidity.

 

[Skylar]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

 

[progressive hunter]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

 

[Skylar]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

You keep waiting for evidence that there's zero indication actually exists.

 

[progressive hunter]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

You keep waiting for evidence that there's zero indication actually exists.

thats your opinion not mine,,,and another sign of your ignorance,,,

this wont be decided at the state level,,,

 

[Toro]

 

[Contumacious]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

You keep waiting for evidence that there's zero indication actually exists.

And you came to this "conclusion" how?

The ONLY way Biden won is through FRAUD.


And there are constituional issues pending resolution like the Pennsylvania Supreme Court can nor reverse or ignore Bush v Gore (2000).

 

[Lysistrata]

I am waiting and hoping that the judges who have had to hear these cases will discipline these lawyers (ref: Rule 11) or even start proceedings to disbar them. trump's lawyers have brought frivolous lawsuits time after time, and even lied to the court.

I cant wait till the Supremes here the part where some of the kids of those lawyers were threatened with death, that really goes well in an election year.

Trump campaign lawyer under protection after 'threats of harm' (nypost.com)

How many people have received threats of harm? Another Michigan health official resigned yesterday after her children were photographed on their playground. Can you help us Americans track down those people who are sending threats? Some people are even sending threats to governors and other public officials, even threats of kidnapping.

 

[Skylar]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

You keep waiting for evidence that there's zero indication actually exists.

thats your opinion not mine,,,and another sign of your ignorance,,,

this wont be decided at the state level,,,

You've never read the case we're discussing, you didn't even know its name until I told you. You had no links to the rulings.....I had to feed those to you too. You were completely unprepared.

For someone who tosses around the word 'ignorance' as much as you do, you're surprisingly uninformed.

Sorry...but this mythical 'evidence' you're waiting for has simply never materialized. Again, don't take my word for it. Here's the judge's findings themselves:

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote." At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."

 

[Coyote]

Pennsylvania judge throws out Trump lawsuit, clearing way for Biden win

A Pennsylvania judge threw out a lawsuit that sought to prevent the state from certifying the election results in favor of Democrat Joe Biden, who won the state by about 80,000 votes.

www.foxnews.com

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters," Brann said Saturday. "This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated."

 

[Coyote]

...So you want to Abolish prisons Defund the cops All drugs legal Universal income Ban guns Sounds like you want communism

Whatever in-the-world are you babbling about?

And, more importantly...

Whatever in-the-world does any of that claptrap have to do with whether or not the failed Rumpian power-grab got tossed out of court on its ear for lack of merit?

You asked how Rump was losing in this narrow context.

You were supplied with an irrefutable example of same.

Case closed.

Trump didn't lose, he won more votes then the beloved Obama, the one who lost is you.

He won far fewer votes than Biden.

 

[Coyote]

How did Trump lose? Please be specific...

When your quest for an injunction to stop vote-certification is laughed out of court, that's 'losing'...

So you want to

Abolish prisons

Defund the cops

All drugs legal

Universal income

Ban guns

Sounds like you want communism

Biden isn’t for all that.

 

[progressive hunter]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

You keep waiting for evidence that there's zero indication actually exists.

thats your opinion not mine,,,and another sign of your ignorance,,,

this wont be decided at the state level,,,

You've never read the case we're discussing, you didn't even know its name until I told you. You had no links to the rulings.....I had to feed those to you too. You were completely unprepared.

For someone who tosses around the word 'ignorance' as much as you do, you're surprisingly uninformed.

Sorry...but this mythical 'evidence' you're waiting for has simply never materialized. Again, don't take my word for it. Here's the judge's findings themselves:

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote." At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."

I dont care about the cases you are discussing,,

the only thing that matters is the final case,,,

and if you cared about this country and our constitution you would want everything in the open to insure this was an honest and fair election,,

 

[Skylar]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

You keep waiting for evidence that there's zero indication actually exists.

And you came to this "conclusion" how?

The failure of Trump's team to ever present the evidence. And the fact that in court, Trump's lawyers have been very clear that they're not even ALLEGING fraud occurred.

As Judge Brann said:

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote." At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."

The ONLY way Biden won is through FRAUD.

Says you. Its the evidence where your argument just falls to silly pieces.

 

[Contumacious]

View attachment 419718

Understood.

The ignorant federal judge does not understand that this is not business as usual.

That what the socialists seek is to completely abandon our Constitutional Form of Government and create a socialist republic.

In a socialist republic his job will be unnecessary and will be eliminated.

And you are so stupid that in your quest to get rid of Trump you are willing to devastate our country,

It may take a while but the evidence is fraud is forthcoming.

.

 

[progressive hunter]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

You keep waiting for evidence that there's zero indication actually exists.

And you came to this "conclusion" how?

The failure of Trump's team to ever present the evidence. And the fact that in court, Trump's lawyers have been very clear that they're not even ALLEGING fraud occurred.

As Judge Brann said:

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote." At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."

The ONLY way Biden won is through FRAUD.

Says you. Its the evidence where your argument just falls to silly pieces.

good for him,,,

 

[Skylar]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

You keep waiting for evidence that there's zero indication actually exists.

thats your opinion not mine,,,and another sign of your ignorance,,,

this wont be decided at the state level,,,

You've never read the case we're discussing, you didn't even know its name until I told you. You had no links to the rulings.....I had to feed those to you too. You were completely unprepared.

For someone who tosses around the word 'ignorance' as much as you do, you're surprisingly uninformed.

Sorry...but this mythical 'evidence' you're waiting for has simply never materialized. Again, don't take my word for it. Here's the judge's findings themselves:

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote." At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."

I dont care about the cases you are discussing,,

the only thing that matters is the final case,,,

and if you cared about this country and our constitution you would want everything in the open to insure this was an honest and fair election,,

You don't care....about the case we're discussing in the thread? You get that the links I fed you like a momma bird to her little helpless chick were for the case in the OP, yes?

That's why you didn't know the first thing about it, why you didn't even know its name, why you'd never ready the ruling?

 

[meaner gene]

There is nothing futile about having a lawsuit dismissed on TECHNICAL GROUNDS - specifically it was not dismissed on the merits.

It was thrown out for lack of evidence.

That's not really a "technical ground", such as lack of standing, or lack of jurisdiction.

 

[progressive hunter]

They were seeking an injunction. That's a legal request for a court order. That never involves a jury.

You can't get an injunction if there is no civil lawsuit >$20 involved.
Dismissing the request for injunction is not the same as dismissing the entire lawsuit.

The request for injunction IS the lawsuit. They're asking for an injunction on the certification of the vote totals the day after tomorrow.

got a link???

Here are *all* the links for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Boockvar, including Justice Brann's dismissing of the entire lawsuit as moot.

Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al. 4:20-CV-02078 | Middle District of Pennsylvania | United States District Court

www.pamd.uscourts.gov

sounds like they got him now,,,

I'm still waiting for the final hand to be played,,,

Or....you've been played again.

Ask the 'Q-Army' how 'waiting for Trump to play his hand' worked out for them.

how can I be played when all I'm doing is waiting to se what happens???

youre the one trying pretty hard to hide something not me,,

You keep waiting for evidence that there's zero indication actually exists.

thats your opinion not mine,,,and another sign of your ignorance,,,

this wont be decided at the state level,,,

You've never read the case we're discussing, you didn't even know its name until I told you. You had no links to the rulings.....I had to feed those to you too. You were completely unprepared.

For someone who tosses around the word 'ignorance' as much as you do, you're surprisingly uninformed.

Sorry...but this mythical 'evidence' you're waiting for has simply never materialized. Again, don't take my word for it. Here's the judge's findings themselves:

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more," the judge wrote." At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."

I dont care about the cases you are discussing,,

the only thing that matters is the final case,,,

and if you cared about this country and our constitution you would want everything in the open to insure this was an honest and fair election,,

You don't care....about the case we're discussing in the thread? You get that the links I fed you like a momma bird to her little helpless chick were for the case in the OP, yes?

That's why you didn't know the first thing about it, why you didn't even know its name, why you'd never ready the ruling?

I dont care about yesterdays news,,,

why is it you dont want the truth to come out???

what are the democrats hiding???