Fears of hottest year on record as global temperatures spike

[Hollie]

''... while it's still too late''.

Leave it to a warmist.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The thing is I wouldn't support any country be they capitilist or communist for damaging the environment and harming the human populations standard of living. I'd demand better.

Commies were the best at damaging the environment and giving their people a crappy standard of living.

 

[mamooth]

You are confused about this.

They take a few temperature measurements and then use those measurement as proxies for the vast amount of area on earth that is not monitored.

No, they take _thousands_ of temperature measurements.

And the interpolation between stations is very, very accurate.

Your cult should have told you that, but your cult likes keeping you stupid.

The models they use for the projections are mostly shit in shit computer simulations that may or may not be valid.

The models have been excellent. If someone told you otherwise, they lied to your face. You should ask them why they lied to your face. Or you can just keep thanking them for lying to you.

Usually developed by universities under grants by agencies that are looking for a particular outcome.

That's you projecting your own corruption. Everyone on your side lies for money, so you assume the other side must behave the same way. That is not the case. We are not like you. Nobody is as corrupt as you are.

They even manipulate the temperature readings. NOAA was found to being doing that big time.

An outright lie on your part, but expected. Because all the evidence says you're lying, your cult is forced to manufacture conspiracy theories.

This is why it's so good to be on the rational side. We don't have to lie and spin. To win, we just point to the truth, and then watch how it triggers you.

 

[Flash]

No, they take _thousands_ of temperature measurements.

And the interpolation between stations is very, very accurate.

Your cult should have told you that, but your cult likes keeping you stupid.


The models have been excellent. If someone told you otherwise, they lied to your face. You should ask them why they lied to your face. Or you can just keep thanking them for lying to you.


That's you projecting your own corruption. Everyone on your side lies for money, so you assume the other side must behave the same way. That is not the case. We are not like you. Nobody is as corrupt as you are.


An outright lie on your part, but expected. Because all the evidence says you're lying, your cult is forced to manufacture conspiracy theories.

This is why it's so good to be on the rational side. We don't have to lie and spin. To win, we just point to the truth, and then watch how it triggers you.

You can be in denial all you want. You stupid Moon Bats live in a world of denial. We see it all the time. Like you are in denial that Joe Potatohead is a corrupt incompetent piece of shit.

However facts are facts. The indisputable fact is the AGW scammers have no credibility because they have been caught numerous times with fraudulent and cherry picked data that have no connection to real science.

 

[mamooth]

You can be in denial all you want

I understand why you're so upset.

The world keeps warming strongly. You lie, you cry, you whimper, you push fraud at levels never seen before in human history, but reality doesn't care about your propaganda. The world just keeps warming strongly.

That means the liberals have been proven to be correct, again, and you've been proven to be a brainwashed rube, again. And the whole world sees it, and you know it. Hence your sore-loser weeping.

There is a way to stop being a loser, to stop getting humiliated over and over. Just stop parroting the propaganda of your fascist masters.

 

[EMH]

The world keeps warming strongly.

No evidence of this at all. Growing urban areas warm on the surface, that's all your fudged fraud Co2 side has...

That means the liberals have been proven to be correct

Laughable. You have no warming in the atmosphere, the oceans, no cane breakout, no ocean rise, no ongoing net ice melt...

And your side cannot explain a map of the Arctic.

And it cannot dent the LAND NEAR THE POLES theory at all.


And that is why the Co2 fraud should be completely zeroed out of the budget, because...

 

[mamooth]

No evidence of this at all. Growing urban areas warm on the surface, that's all your fudged fraud Co2 side has...

Urban areas have shown _less_ warming than rural areas.

That fact destroys your attempt at fraud. Not that you care. Fraud is all you have, so fraud is what you push.

Laughable. You have no warming in the atmosphere, the oceans, no cane breakout, no ocean rise, no ongoing net ice melt...

All totally wrong, but again, the fraud is all you have.

And your side cannot explain a map of the Arctic.

Sure we can. See the Arctic? It matches the map. Sweet Jeebus, you're stupid.

And it cannot dent the LAND NEAR THE POLES theory at all.

No one except you knows what that theory is. Is it something like the hollow earth?

 

[EMH]

Urban areas have shown _less_ warming than rural areas.

Complete bullshit...

See the Arctic? It matches the map

The warmers cannot explain why there is ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland while there are trees and moose north of Arctic Circle on Alaska...

and that has everything to do with the fact that when land gets to within 600 miles of a pole as Greenland recently did, it goes into ice age, which is why Earth ice now reads

Antarctica 90%
Greenland 7%

Because both are continents within 600 miles of a pole, and both are in ice age, while Alaska is not.

And the amount of ice dictates Earth's climate - ocean level, temp, atmospheric thickness, humidity

So Earth's climate change is all about land near the poles, and land moves, and Co2 does absolutely NOTHING...

 

[Crick]

Complete bullshit...





The warmers cannot explain why there is ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland while there are trees and moose north of Arctic Circle on Alaska...

and that has everything to do with the fact that when land gets to within 600 miles of a pole as Greenland recently did, it goes into ice age, which is why Earth ice now reads

Antarctica 90%
Greenland 7%

Because both are continents within 600 miles of a pole, and both are in ice age, while Alaska is not.

And the amount of ice dictates Earth's climate - ocean level, temp, atmospheric thickness, humidity

So Earth's climate change is all about land near the poles, and land moves, and Co2 does absolutely NOTHING...

Where is your data?

 

[EMH]

Where is your data?

REFUTE ONE WORD OF THAT!!!

Show us a piece of land within 600 miles of a pole not in ice age....

Start the Jeopardy! music

 

[Crick]

REFUTE ONE WORD OF THAT!!!

Show us a piece of land within 600 miles of a pole not in ice age....

Start the Jeopardy! music

No one cares about your delusional fantasy.

You claim CO2 doesn't warm the planet. Show us the data.

You claim there has been no warming. Show us the data.

You claim there has been no rise in sea level. Show us the data.

 

[mamooth]

The warmers cannot explain why there is ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland while there are trees and moose north of Arctic Circle on Alaska..

Sure we can. We did. Precipitation.

And you didn't like the response, so you cried and ran, like you do every time. At least you're a consistent coward.

.and that has everything to do with the fact that when land gets to within 600 miles of a pole as Greenland recently did, it goes into ice age, which is why Earth ice now reads

Antarctica 90%
Greenland 7%

You're just raving.

Anyways, what does this have to do with anything? Ice ages have come and gone with the continents in their present positions, so clearly that's not the only factor in play. That means your theory is laughably stupid.

 

[EMH]

No one cares about your delusional fantasy.

You claim CO2 doesn't warm the planet. Show us the data.

You claim there has been no warming. Show us the data.

You claim there has been no rise in sea level. Show us the data.

All of that has been posted over and over, and once again you prove


YOU CANNOT EXPLAIN A MAP OF THE ARCTIC

$20 trillion spent and our "top climate scientists" cannot explain a MAP of the Arctic....

HOW PATHETIC IS THAT???


The truth that land within 600 miles of a pole on Earth is all in ice age IS DATA, it is DATA YOU HATE, because to EXPLAIN THAT is TO BUST Co2, atmosphere and Sun as NON FACTORS IN EARTH CLIMATE CHANGE...

 

[EMH]

Sure we can. We did. Precipitation.

LOL!!!!

Low End Mossad Moron....

 

[EMH]

REFUTE ONE WORD OF THAT!!!

Show us a piece of land within 600 miles of a pole not in ice age....

Start the Jeopardy! music

Jeopardy! music still playing


The cannot refute one word of the LAND NEAR THE POLES theory, not one word, they know it, and they have resorted to this trolling tactic because that's all they have left....


The Theory is here... where they have had plenty of time to try to refute it, and cannot...

Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[EMH]

can crick refute any of that?

NO

crick just runs away, lies, hides, trolls, complains to the mods, and dodges questions... THAT HE CANNOT ANSWER

 

[Hurricanelover]

 

[EMH]

"There is NOTHING like this on the instrumental record"


Correct, and that is the difference between DATA (from instruments) and FUDGE (where data from instruments is FUDGED to show "warming" that does not exist)


Worst decade for canes on record = the 1940s....

What causes canes? OCEAN HEAT

 

[Crick]

My immediate reaction was that it was so dramatic it had to be some sort of instrument or analytical error, but apparently it is quite real. There has been a lot of noise from the deniers for the last several months noting the slowdown in warming. I think we now see where that energy went. And this has happened before.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Fears of hottest year on record as global temperatures spike​

I think i'll be close or maybe 2nd to 2016, but we will see. If we can start seeing some seriously hot months from this month forward we'll have a chance.

/——-/ This June has been about 6-8 degrees cooler than average this year always in the low 70s.

July Weather in Long Island New York, United States​

Daily high temperatures increase by 2°F, from 78°F to 81°F, rarely falling below 71°F or exceeding 88°F. The highest daily average high temperature is 81°F on July 21.

Daily low temperatures increase by 3°F, from 62°F to 65°F, rarely falling below 53°F or exceeding 72°F. The highest daily average low temperature is 65°F on July 30.

For reference, on July 21, the hottest day of the year, temperatures in Long Island typically range from 65°F to 81°F, while on January 30, the coldest day of the year, they range from 23°F to 38°F.