FDR: Warning about today's Republicans

Unkotare said:
I said Carter was a ******* anti-semite and I proved it. You were, and continue to be, nothing but a whiny *****.
Click to expand...

In other words, you are recalcitrantly stubborn and a liar to boot. You are very similar to koshergirl, aren't you? :lol:
 
I have a problem with terms as "most historians". If you can't list who the historians are/were and provide a source to validate your statement, then how could any one believe you?
 
obama Imagination and Communication: Obama's top scores

Translation = Communicates a lie better than any other president.
 
So you went to Bob Jones University and some far right wack group gave you some $$$.

As if you compare with 228 modern historians in whole.

Being sold on yourself is a bad bargain.




Liberty said:
JakeStarkey said:
Liberty said:
poor jake...objective research is scary isn't it?
Click to expand...

Liberty continues to show the weakheadedness of his side.
Click to expand...

Part of my senior thesis was concerning the failure of progressives in the 30s...and I got 100% A+ on it and was offered $1500 in research money (not bad for undergrad) sooooooo...I think you should look past your embedded ideology. Objective research is worth doing...at least, to those who are not hacks. Also, this was done at a heavy liberal university, and looked at by the whole history department...I am not tooting my own horn I am simply saying it is better to find the truth than simply stay grounded in an ideology. Don't fear changes in your own beliefs the more you discover the truth...IF you try to find the truth, which right now, you don't.
Click to expand...
 
You are entitled to your wrong opinion. That's your American right. But the reasonable standards type of guy is going to take 228 reputable historians' opinion before yours, if we are talking about an appeal to authority.
 
JakeStarkey said:
You are entitled to your wrong opinion. That's your American right. But the reasonable standards type of guy is going to take 228 reputable historians' opinion before yours, if we are talking about an appeal to authority.
Click to expand...

I am entitled to the truth, and that is exactly what I have acquired. That is not an American right, that is a human right. You sir, are the one who chooses ignorance of objective, independent, and private research of primary sources to formulate your own opinion. A typical modern liberal, you look to others to make your opinion for you and choose not to delve into the fray of research yourself to discover facts. A very dismal way to live, but hey, some people are just too chicken shit to do their own research.
 
Last edited:
You, sir, are entitled to believe that, of course. Critical thinking, along "objective, independent, and private research of primary sources" requires the recognition of, and the accounting for, personal bias. I am no more a liberal than you are a modern, independent thinker. Your unrestrained bias is evident in your posts. Quite common among extremist right-wing reactionaries like you.

You have the right to your opinion, but not to your own facts and not to redefining traditional historical definitions and principles.

There you trip yourself up all the time.
 
JakeStarkey said:
You, sir, are entitled to believe that, of course. Critical thinking, along "objective, independent, and private research of primary sources" requires the recognition of, and the accounting for, personal bias. I am no more a liberal than you are a modern, independent thinker. Your unrestrained bias is evident in your posts. Quite common among extremist right-wing reactionaries like you.

You have the right to your opinion, but not to your own facts and not to redefining traditional historical definitions and principles.

There you trip yourself up all the time.
Click to expand...

What political philosophers have you read that shaped your ideology? You, being so educated, must be familiar with the works of say...Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, yes? Also, lol @ libertarians being right wing. Do you even know what that means? haha. So, you are like a holocaust denier? You basically deny that FDR imprisoned American citizens, was derelict in his duty to protect Hawaii, and funneled in the modern corporatist monster economy through his massive subsidy and spending programs? These are facts. Go to irs.gov and look at the records.

Tell you what, I will even go so far as in sending you my thesis, and give you a shot to find any historical inaccuracies. It is 26 (+10 for bibliography) pages with about 70 sources, the majority of which are primary sources. Would you like to give it a shot? Afterall, with your great wisdom I am sure you can find what is inaccurate that the chair of the University of Colorado history department could not. Afterall, you are so smart.
 
Last edited:
Liberty said:
JakeStarkey said:
You, sir, are entitled to believe that, of course. Critical thinking, along "objective, independent, and private research of primary sources" requires the recognition of, and the accounting for, personal bias. I am no more a liberal than you are a modern, independent thinker. Your unrestrained bias is evident in your posts. Quite common among extremist right-wing reactionaries like you.

You have the right to your opinion, but not to your own facts and not to redefining traditional historical definitions and principles.

There you trip yourself up all the time.
Click to expand...

What political philosophers have you read that shaped your ideology? You, being so educated, must be familiar with the works of say...Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, yes? Also, lol @ libertarians being right wing. Do you even know what that means? haha. So, you are like a holocaust denier? You basically deny that FDR imprisoned American citizens, was derelict in his duty to protect Hawaii, and funneled in the modern corporatist monster economy through his massive subsidy and spending programs? These are facts. Go to irs.gov and look at the records.

Tell you what, I will even go so far as in sending you my thesis, and give you a shot to find any historical inaccuracies. It is 26 (+10 for bibliography) pages with about 70 sources, the majority of which are primary sources. Would you like to give it a shot? Afterall, with your great wisdom I am sure you can find what is inaccurate that the chair of the University of Colorado history department could not. Afterall, you are so smart.
Click to expand...

You mock what I am: objective, fair, aware and account for my bias. I am aware of and know the primary sources from Hobbes, Locke, etc, to the present day. A thesis of 26 pages of narrative, and 10 pages of documentation with 70 sources? A thesis? OK.

We will find your thesis somewhere in here?

CU Undergraduate or Honors Theses All honors theses are retained by the Honors Program, located on the fourth floor of Norlin Library (room M400, 4th floor). Any thesis completed in the last two years is available for viewing on demand, during Honors office business hours. It is recommended that you call the Honors Program (303-492-6617) with specific information about older theses, allowing additional time to retrieve them before your visit. Because these materials don’t leave the building, you will be provided with a quiet place to examine the thesis or theses you’ve requested. For additional information, please follow this link to the Honors web page: Honors Program | University of Colorado at Boulderhttp://www.colorado.edu/honors/
 
Last edited:
no. I kept the graded hard copy. I'd shoot you an email though.
 
15th post
JakeStarkey said:
Unkotare said:
I said Carter was a ******* anti-semite and I proved it. You were, and continue to be, nothing but a whiny *****.
Click to expand...

In other words, you are recalcitrantly stubborn and a liar to boot. You are very similar to koshergirl, aren't you? :lol:
Click to expand...



No, in no words in any way related to that, yet another stupid and incoherent post from you.
 
Unkotare said:
JakeStarkey said:
The Siena College Research Institute has asked 238 presidential scholars to rank presidents five times since 1982. This year was a polling year. Franklin Roosevelt came in first, Barack Obama at 15th, George W. Bush at 40th, and Andrew Johnson dead last.

How Historians Rank the Presidents - Julia Edwards - NationalJournal.com
Click to expand...


FDR was a scumbag, and the most dangerous person to ever occupy the office.
Click to expand...

he also did really shitty in college and admitted he had no interest in learning economics either before or during his presidency.
 
Last edited:
Unkotare said:
JakeStarkey said:
The Siena College Research Institute has asked 238 presidential scholars to rank presidents five times since 1982. This year was a polling year. Franklin Roosevelt came in first, Barack Obama at 15th, George W. Bush at 40th, and Andrew Johnson dead last.

How Historians Rank the Presidents - Julia Edwards - NationalJournal.com
Click to expand...


FDR was a scumbag, and the most dangerous person to ever occupy the office.
Click to expand...

And you rate with CrusaderFrank as one of the most morally insane on the Board. :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Is this history, or is it now?

< Previous Thread

Muggereidge on the Obama Era

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Robert W
How FDR had the same problem Trump has now
Replies
3
Views
230
Hafar1014
Hafar1014
E
WWII could have ended before the end of 1944
Replies
11
Views
225
Zebra
Z
0
On This Day In History - February 27, Twenty Second Amendment Ratified.
Replies
4
Views
109
0311
0
E
Biggest medical coverup in history of the US
Replies
0
Views
201
eagle7-31
E
FDR_Reagan
FDR’s “Day of Infamy” Speech Crafting a Call to Arms
Replies
4
Views
230
Unkotare
Unkotare

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom