The link doesn't change anything. The question still is asked by YOU. If you were asking, you were needing to know.Maybe. I agree that the judge (at a possible trial) makes the call in admissibility. The photos were redacted. And they were used as āevidenceā in a submission to the court. (Of course the real purpose was to try to make it a public spectacle.). So, I donāt think that will even weigh on the issue of admissibility.
What Iām saying is just that the fact that the boxes were opened doesnāt mean much. To comply with the warrant, they needed to be opened.
What is left unsaid by the scumbags at DOJ, of course, is the big issue. Weāre they or were they not already declassified? The DOJ knew that claim existed. They even mentioned it to the judge. (They were boxed in. They had to.) The big question is whether they can justify their ābeliefā that the documents had not been declassified.
As to all the rest (non classified material) this is all bullshit. Iāll stipulate it was all technically the property of the United States. So what? They had been engaged in negotiations. Physical temporary possession is t even a crime.
And one other thing, while you tell everyone a thousand times they were declassified, show us the proof? Can you? No! You just keep running that trap with shit in your mouth about it.
If you want to be taken seriously, link the proof. Don't keep on posting the same stupid shit. Show us, don't tell us fool.
This is you liar; What is left unsaid by the scumbags at DOJ, of course, is the big issue. Weāre they or were they not already declassified?
